
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
No data available
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
An improvement on the original with enjoyable humor and a quirky tone, though repetitive pacing, unclear stat and card effects, and silently impossible objectives hold it back.
Improved over original game: Many players consider this a superior sequel, with more content, event cards, and characters than the original. The wider cast and more jaw-dropping moments make it a favorite in the series.
Positive overall reception: Players broadly describe the game as excellent, fun, and addictive, with many calling it a good casual roguelike. The core gameplay formula is repeatedly praised as enjoyable and engaging.
Enjoyable humor and quirky tone: Reviewers highlight the game's irreverent humor, charming mysterious elements, and quirky personality. The queen premise and condescending male advisors add comedic flavor.
Item mechanic adds depth: The new item and artifact mechanic lets players affect dialogue, alter situations, and save themselves when a scale is at zero. This expands gameplay beyond the original binary yes-or-no choice.
Unique trial-and-error experience: Players describe the game as a unique trial-and-error experience with a great concept. New mechanics and additions help combat repetitiveness.
Excessive repetition and monotony: A large body of feedback describes the game as highly repetitive, from similar events to repeated dialogue and homogenized later gameplay. Many players find the loop tiring and boring within a couple of hours.
Unclear stat and card effects: Players cannot see how decisions or cards affect stats and resources, unlike in the first game. Card effects often seem nonsensical, making outcomes feel random and hard to plan around.
Objectives become impossible silently: Players report that objectives can become unachievable after missed events or wrong choices, and the game does not clearly indicate when this happens. This leaves players stuck without understanding why progress stalled.
Replay and full completion tedious: Replaying is described as more tedious than the first game, and collecting all cards for the achievement is a frustrating grind. There is also no way to start a completely fresh game to try again.
Weak gameplay depth: Gameplay is described as weak, lacking depth on PC, and closer to balancing stats than telling a story. Button-mashing outweighs thinking, and the pace is too fast.
Choice-driven core gameplay: The game is fundamentally built around making choices, with yes-or-no card decisions being the primary interaction. Most feedback centers on this Reigns-like loop where decisions shape events and outcomes.
Item and inventory system: An inventory system where found items can affect dialogue, rescue the player, or alter situations beyond a simple yes-or-no choice. Understanding how items work is required to progress effectively.
Stat and faction balancing: Players must balance four resources (church, people, army, money) and prevent any faction from becoming too powerful or too weak. This balancing act is central to the challenge and tension of the game.
Reincarnation and fourth-wall story: The game features a reincarnation meta-story where progress and items carry between lives, and the narrative becomes increasingly self-aware about being a game. This cycle of death and rebirth frames the overarching plot.
Trial-and-error gameplay loop: Gameplay is based on trial and error, with RNG-driven outcomes and random events that require players to learn from failures. The simple, casual roguelike structure supports repeated attempts.
Recommended for Reigns fans: Players who enjoy the original Reigns or its swipe-to-survive gameplay are encouraged to buy this without hesitation. It is also considered worth trying even without prior experience with the first game.
Negative recommendation and money warning: Several reviewers give a negative recommendation and warn against giving the game a chance if you do not want to waste money. Some suggest spending time on more productive activities instead.
Appeals to cryptic puzzle fans: The game is recommended for players who enjoy hyper-cryptic puzzles and can tolerate repetitive dialogue. Initial fun is noted as worth trying, though highly recommended overall.
Frustrating for achievement hunters: Players pursuing achievements find the game only frustrating and do not recommend it for that purpose. This is a specific warning for completionists.
Session length: 0.1h.
Players find the game addictive early, especially while uncovering options, but its novelty fades quickly and later play becomes repetitive or opaque. Some players report bugs and boredom, but the dominant profile is an early peak followed by decline.
Friction: Hyper-cryptic puzzles; Repetitive dialogue; Shallow and repetitive choices; Time capsule and royal deed bugs; Later actions are not discoverable without a guide.
Unlock drivers: Start uncovering the options.
Completionist Card Collector: Grinds card reveals and tracks achievement progress across long sessions. Motivation: Completing card collections and earning every achievement. Stance: sale.
Cryptic Puzzle Solver: Works through obscure puzzles and tolerates repetitive dialogue. Motivation: Solving hyper-cryptic puzzles. Stance: buy.
Casual Mobile Roguelike Player: Plays in brief mobile or solo bursts and values immediate casual fun. Motivation: Quick casual runs that fit short play sessions. Stance: sale.
Strong sequel to Reigns: Multiple reviewers describe the game as a solid or excellent follow-up to the original Reigns, improving on it in most respects. A few consider it more of an expansion than a true reinvention.
Better suited for mobile: Several reviewers feel the game works better on mobile than on PC, where it may feel less engaging. This suggests the PC port is a weaker experience.
Mixed comparisons to original: Opinions diverge sharply, with some calling this entry considerably better and others preferring the first game. A few dismiss both titles as poor.
Similar core gameplay loop: Reviewers note the gameplay closely mirrors the first game, following the same rhythm and mechanics with a female protagonist. Some see this as familiar rather than innovative.
More content than original: The sequel adds more event cards and content compared to the original Reigns, giving players more variety. Pacing of story-progress cards is also seen as improved.