
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
A janky but joyful Daggerfall successor offering vast player freedom and frequent updates, though content variety remains thin.
Game is highly enjoyable: Players consistently describe the game as fun, addictive, and entertaining, with many noting it is hard to put down. The gameplay is praised for being innovative, memorable, and providing a great time overall.
Extensive player freedom: The game is praised for offering immense freedom, allowing players to do whatever they want in a large sandbox. This nonlinear, freeform approach supports a wide range of playstyles and goals.
High potential and ambition: Players see immense potential in the game, noting it is already doing great and has a ton of planned content. The ambitious scope and solid foundation are frequently highlighted.
Robust and fun magic system: The magic system is described as incredibly fun, robust, and flexible, allowing for creative use. Players enjoy experimenting with the system, which is a standout feature of the game.
Deep crafting and building: The game features deep crafting systems with tons of recipes, alongside building mechanics that allow constructing houses and structures. This adds a significant layer of gameplay depth.
Game is buggy and janky: Multiple reviews describe the game as buggy, janky, and rough around the edges, with stability issues and a need for polish. These issues are widespread and affect the overall experience.
Lack of content and variety: The game is criticized for having limited content, sparse world, and repetitive elements such as dungeons, enemies, and gameplay loops. This makes the experience feel incomplete and boring over time.
Repetitive gameplay and dungeons: Players find the gameplay loop and dungeon generation repetitive, leading to boredom after a few hours. The lack of variety in enemies and world interactivity contributes to this feeling.
Difficulty balance problems: The game allows players to achieve godmode easily, and enemies become too weak as the player levels up. This reduces challenge and makes the game too easy.
World feels empty: The world is described as fairly empty and lacking interactivity, with low mob variety. This makes exploration less engaging and the environment feel lifeless.
Procedural generation is core: The game heavily relies on procedural generation for worlds, quests, and content, creating a unique experience each playthrough. This is a defining feature mentioned by many players.
Large open world: Players highlight the massive, open world, with one mentioning a 500 square kilometer area. The world is procedurally generated, offering a vast sandbox for exploration and activities.
Custom spell creation: The game features a spellmaking system that allows players to create custom spells, adding depth to the magic system. This is a popular feature among players who enjoy flexibility in magic.
Extensive crafting system: Crafting is a major component, including gathering resources, smithing, and creating items with magical effects. Players appreciate the variety and depth of crafting options.
Classic RPG experience: The game is described as a classic or old-school RPG with sandbox elements, featuring stat systems and progression. It appeals to fans of traditional role-playing games.
Poor optimization and performance: Multiple reviews report the game is unoptimized, runs horribly, and has significant performance problems. This is a common complaint affecting overall gameplay experience.
Frequent crashes and instability: The game crashes often, including on Vulkan, during world generation, and when loading saves. Some users report the game is really unstable and crashes way too often.
Runs well on low-end hardware: Several users report the game runs well on low-end laptops and garbage PCs with rare tolerable exceptions. This suggests the game can be playable on modest hardware.
FPS drops with many NPCs: Frame rates plummet to single digits when multiple NPCs are active or attacking each other, even with reduced view range and SSD. Performance takes a noticeable hit with 10+ NPCs on screen.
FPS drops in cities: Entering cities causes immediate FPS drops to 38 or lower, with some reports of 5-10 FPS near cities. This is a specific and consistent performance issue in urban areas.
Recommended for Daggerfall fans: Many reviewers recommend this game to fans of classic RPGs like Daggerfall, Morrowind, and King's Field, citing its old-school feel and hardcore mechanics. This is the most common recommendation theme.
Worth the price: Reviewers frequently state the game is well worth its price, even in early access, given the amount of content and enjoyment it provides. This is a strong positive signal for potential buyers.
Try the demo first: Several reviewers advise playing the demo before purchasing, especially if unsure, as it provides a good sense of the game's mechanics and performance. This is a practical recommendation for hesitant players.
Great for RPG fans: The game is recommended for fans of RPGs and fantasy, with some calling it a must-have for the genre. This suggests broad appeal within the RPG community.
Highly recommended overall: Many reviewers give strong, unreserved recommendations, praising the game's depth and enjoyment. This indicates high overall satisfaction among players.
Community fair range: $12.00 - $18.00.
Game completion: 14.0h.
Endgame: 14.0h.
The game has a slow, rough start with a steep learning curve, but becomes highly enjoyable once players understand the mechanics and get into the flow. Most reviewers report that fun arrives after overcoming early friction, though some note later repetitiveness.
Friction: grueling early game; sharp learning curve; slow start; death loops at levels 1-5; confusing chatting system; lack of tutorial.
Unlock drivers: understanding the mechanics; getting into the flow; figuring out how to do things; getting past the early game; learning the main mechanics.
Old-School RPG Purist: Exploratory, system-driven, often roleplaying or min-maxing within the old-school framework. Motivation: Nostalgia and love for classic RPG systems and freedom. Stance: buy.
Power Gamer / Exploit Crafter: Metagaming, min-maxing, exploiting mechanics, seeking overpowered builds. Motivation: Power fantasy and system mastery. Stance: buy.
Sandbox Roleplayer: Roleplaying, exploration, creative problem-solving, often non-combat or unconventional approaches. Motivation: Self-directed adventure, roleplay, and emergent storytelling. Stance: buy.
Performance is generally poor, with severe issues on 8-11GB and 16GB+ VRAM systems, mixed results on sub-8GB systems, and only the 12-15GB VRAM cohort showing a positive (though caveated) reception.
Windows <8GB VRAM: mixed. Some users report playable performance on low-end hardware, but others experience severe frame drops and crashes, indicating inconsistent optimization.
Windows 12-15GB VRAM: positive. All sampled reviews are recommended, though they mention frequent FPS drops and jankiness, suggesting the game is playable but not fully optimized.
Windows 8-11GB VRAM: negative. The majority of reviews report severe performance problems, including single-digit FPS and heavy stuttering, making the game nearly unplayable.
Steam Deck: The game runs natively on Linux, which is a strong positive for Steam Deck users, avoiding launcher or compatibility issues. However, performance is a significant concern, with reports of sub-30fps even on high-end hardware and explicit mentions of performance problems on the Steam Deck. Users may need to adjust power settings or graphical options to achieve a playable experience, indicating a tinkering requirement rather than a seamless out-of-the-box experience.
Linux and Proton: The game provides a native Linux build that runs reliably without Proton or special tweaks, with users reporting it performs at least as well as the Windows version. The only Linux-specific issue is a crash of the Wayland session when quitting the game, which is minor and does not impact gameplay. Overall, Linux compatibility is strong with a small stability caveat.
External guides: The primary user complaint is the lack of instructional data: no functional wiki, a minimal tutorial, and no external help. Players are left to figure out complex mechanics on their own, which creates a significant barrier to learning and enjoying the game. This aligns with the 'Student' tier, where users need data to learn systems and find content.
Spiritual successor to Daggerfall: Many reviewers compare the game to Daggerfall, Morrowind, and other classic Elder Scrolls titles, noting a similar vibe and freedom. It is often described as a modern Daggerfall or a spiritual successor.
Frequent weekly updates: The game receives regular weekly updates, often every Friday, adding new content and fixing bugs. Reviewers highlight the consistent and frequent update schedule.
Active and passionate developer: The developer is highly active, passionate, and invested in the game, frequently communicating with the community and implementing feedback. Reviewers appreciate the developer's dedication.
Early access with potential: The game is in early access and still in development, with reviewers noting it is unfinished but has a lot of potential. It is expected to improve over time.
Comparisons to classic RPGs: Beyond Daggerfall, the game is compared to Morrowind, Minecraft, Kenshi, King's Field, and other classic RPGs, appealing to fans of those titles. These comparisons highlight its open-world and systems-driven design.