PIT OF GOBLIN Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-11-04
  • Fun co-op with friends
  • Overall fun and enjoyable
  • Goblin theme and customization
  • Great game overall
  • High difficulty for beginners
  • Frequent bugs reported
PIT OF GOBLIN header

Emotions

Archetypes

Hardware

Windows 16GB+ VRAMpositiveWindows 8-11GB VRAMnegative

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

Fun co-op with friends and a charming goblin theme with customization make it enjoyable overall, though beginners may find it tough and frequent bugs can get in the way.

What players like

Fun with friends: Many reviewers highlight that the game is especially enjoyable when played with friends, often citing cooperative and proximity-based fun.

Overall fun and enjoyable: A large number of players describe the game as fun, chill, and pleasant, with some calling it a blast.

Goblin theme and customization: The goblin theme, including playing as a goblin and customizing characters, is a recurring positive point.

Great game overall: Several reviewers consider the game great or excellent overall, often noting its solid foundation and potential.

Silly and funny moments: Reviewers frequently mention funny and silly situations, particularly when messing around with friends.

Common complaints

High difficulty for beginners and solo: The game is often described as very hard, especially for new players and solo play. Solo difficulty is frequently called impossible or not viable.

Frequent bugs reported: Many players encounter bugs, ranging from minor to gameplay-interfering, and some describe the game as very buggy. Multiplayer bugs like sync failures and invisible players are also mentioned.

Enemies are overpowered and lethal: Monsters and enemies are repeatedly described as too strong, overpowered, and lethal, often killing players quickly. Some enemies appear invulnerable or unbeatable.

No tutorial or guidance: Players report a lack of tutorial and unclear direction at the start, leaving them confused about what to do.

Aggressive NPCs and goblins: Friendly-looking goblins and other NPCs attack players on approach, even when players are trying to buy items. This behavior is unexpected and punishing.

Gameplay and performance

Co-op play with friends: The game is designed for cooperative multiplayer, often with friends. Many reviews highlight playing with up to four players.

Feed the King and Queen: The main objective is to gather food for the King and Queen. Players must collect food and bring it back to them.

Combat with various enemies: Players fight monsters such as rats, slimes, and zombies. Enemies can be avoided by learning their patterns.

Multiplayer with host server: Multiplayer requires a host to create a server. Players can join with friends or random players.

Encounter hostile goblins: Goblins appear as enemies that players can fight or that attack the player. Some goblins may seem friendly but are dangerous.

Runs well on some systems: Some users report smooth performance on laptops without dedicated GPUs, low-end computers, and mid-range systems. The game also runs perfectly on Manjaro Linux.

Poor optimization and lag: Many players report severe lag and poor optimization, making the game unplayable for some. Performance is inconsistent across different hardware configurations.

Multiplayer connection problems: Network issues arise, particularly with four players, while three-player sessions are stable. Sync failures and invisible players also occur.

Frequent crashes and freezes: The game crashes often and freezes, especially on the first level due to bugs. Stability issues are a major concern.

Minor technical issues: Small bugs and technical roughness are present, but they are not severe. These include occasional glitches.

Recommendations

Strong overall recommendation: Numerous players give the game a full recommendation, often with high praise such as 10/10 or 100% recommended. The sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Highly recommended for co-op: Reviewers highlight the game as great for co-op experiences, especially for fans of co-op horror. It is frequently recommended specifically for group play.

Do not buy: A number of reviewers explicitly advise against purchasing the game, even on sale, expressing strong negative sentiment. Some say it's better to have no game than this one.

Worth the price: Many find the game worth its price, including full price, and consider it a good value. Some specifically note it is worth buying even at full price.

Not recommended currently: Some players do not recommend the game in its current state, suggesting waiting until it becomes more stable. This indicates issues with the game's current condition.

Buying context

Community fair range: $2.99 - $5.99.

Game completion: 10.0h.

Story completion: 4.0h.

Session length: 2.6h.

Endgame: 30.0h.

Players report fun almost immediately when playing co-op with friends or randoms, built on chaotic scavenging and shared scares. The main caveats are a lack of tutorial, early confusion, difficulty, and bugs, especially for solo players.

Friction: No tutorial or clear objective leaves new players unsure what to do; Bugs, crashes, and multiplayer connection issues; Unbalanced enemies and difficulty for newcomers; Dark maps and limited visibility; Timer too short; Solo play is boring or impractical.

Player profiles

Co-op Chaos Seeker: Runs 2-4 player online sessions, scavenges food, flees monsters, and leans into chaotic banter. Motivation: Shared chaotic laughter, tense escapes, and teamwork with friends. Stance: buy.

Solo/Small-Group Scavenger: Attempts solo or duo runs, plays methodically, manages risk and loot, and tests small-group balance. Motivation: A fair, playable solo or duo scavenging loop without losing all progress. Stance: no buy.

Trial-and-Error Newcomer: Learns by trial and error in early runs, relies on environmental signs, and struggles with darkness and monsters. Motivation: Learning the dark dungeon survival loop despite weak onboarding. Stance: sale.

Platform notes

The Windows 16GB+ VRAM cohort shows a clear positive outcome, while the Windows 8-11GB VRAM cohort has only a non-recommended report focused on stage-hazard behavior rather than clear hardware performance.

Windows 16GB+ VRAM: positive. A 24GB VRAM Windows 11 user reports the game runs great, including on a laptop.

Windows 8-11GB VRAM: negative. The only included report is non-recommended and cites inconsistent stage-hazard behavior, with no clear performance details.

Other review notes

Compared to Lethal Company: Many reviews compare the game to Lethal Company, often describing it as similar in style or gameplay, sometimes with unique twists like a goblin theme.

Early access with updates: The game is in early access and developed by a small team, with regular updates and quality-of-life fixes promised and delivered.

Low price and sales: Reviewers frequently mention purchasing the game on sale or at a low price, and note that it offers good value for the cost.

Less content than Lethal Company: Some reviewers feel the game has less content compared to Lethal Company and consider it a cash grab, though others find it has a surprising amount of content for the price.

Significant improvements over time: The game has improved significantly since its early versions, with a massive update making it much better.