
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
Fun, addictive best-in-class battle royale with silly humor and huge weapon variety, though it feels dead and matchmaking drags.
Fun and addictive game: The game is frequently described as very fun, addictive, and satisfying overall. Many call it a great, well-made game that deserves more players.
Funny and silly humor: Reviewers repeatedly highlight the game's silly, wacky sense of humor and its blend of funny and serious tones. This humor stands out as a defining, original trait that keeps the game entertaining.
Best battle royale game: A large group of reviewers consider this the best battle royale they have ever played, calling it a masterpiece of the genre. It is praised as one of the most fun battle royales ever made.
Large weapon variety: Reviewers appreciate the huge selection of guns, including many innovative and customizable options. The variety allows interesting builds and makes each match feel different.
Goofy physics and characters: The wacky physics, gumby-like characters, and being launched across the map are frequently mentioned as sources of fun. This absurd physics is considered a highlight.
Game is Dead: Many players describe the game as dead, dying, or abandoned by developers, with a non-existent active community. This pervasive sentiment reflects a critical lack of players and ongoing support.
Matchmaking Takes Too Long: Due to the low number of players, matchmaking often requires long wait times, sometimes up to 10 minutes, and matches may fail to start. This makes the game frustrating to play regularly.
Bugs and Glitches: The game is frequently described as buggy, janky, and full of glitches that impair normal functionality. These technical issues detract from the overall experience and contribute to negative reviews.
Cheaters and Hackers: Many players encounter hackers and cheaters in matches, with some reports indicating a high frequency while others say it's occasional. This undermines fair play and enjoyment for legitimate players.
Server Stability Issues: Players report problems with server stability, including unstable connections and frequent issues. This disrupts gameplay and adds to the overall frustration.
Battle royale core mode: Many reviews identify the game as a battle royale with a shrinking ring, ragdoll physics, and around 40 to 100 opponents fighting for a single victory.
Solo and squad modes: The game supports solo, duo, and squad play, with squads mode typically requiring up to four players per team.
First-person shooter combat: Players widely describe it as an FPS or movement shooter with standard shooter gameplay against other online players.
Many weapons and abilities: Beyond guns, the game includes grenades, spells, attachments, and other equipment that expand combat options.
Character movement and jumping: Reviews highlight character movement mechanics and the ability to jump over roofs and around the environment.
Lag and Freezes Common: Many players report lag and freezing, especially on laptops and older hardware. This affects gameplay smoothness and overall experience.
Poor Optimization and Bugs: Some players experience poor optimization, bugs, and problems with normal functionality. Optimization is described as so-so or non-existent, with specific issues like inability to shoot or move.
Launch and Crash Issues: The game frequently fails to launch or crashes before opening, with some users seeing only a grey screen. These issues persist despite trying various fixes like Proton layers or launch flags.
Server and Connection Problems: Frequent server issues, matchmaking problems, and connection errors when joining rounds are reported. Servers are described as horrible and unstable.
Runs Well on Low-End PCs: Several players report the game works on low-end or 'potato' PCs, and runs smoothly even on old computers. This suggests good optimization for some hardware.
Recommended for playing with friends: Many reviewers strongly recommend this game for playing with friends. They highlight that it is fun and entertaining with friends, though some might get bored when playing alone.
General recommendations to play: A large number of reviewers simply recommend this game without detailed reasons. They suggest playing it, recommending it to everyone, or saying it is worth playing.
Worth trying, especially free: Reviewers suggest trying the game, often pointing out that it is free so there is nothing to lose. Many recommend it as a worthwhile experience.
Community and player base concerns: Reviewers express concern about the game's player base, encouraging others to join and bring friends to keep the game alive. They hope to see more players in the game.
Positive mentions of game style: Some reviewers compare it favorably to other games, noting it is fun and a funny spin on battle royale. It appeals to fans of FPS, ragdolls, and similar genres.
Community fair range: $0.00 - $5.00.
Session length: 8.0h.
TABG delivers immediate, humorous fun for most players and is strongly amplified by playing with friends; solo play and dead lobbies are the main dampeners.
Friction: Solo play feels boring or not very fun; Dead lobbies and long matchmaking waits; Multiplayer sometimes fails to connect; Hackers and sweats in matches; Little progression outside the main loop; Boredom after a short while or second match.
Unlock drivers: Playing with friends in duos or squads; Multiplayer modes and social settings; Ragdoll physics and absurd humor; Weapon variety and entertaining modifiers; The game's unserious, self-aware tone.
Casual Social Gamer: Plays in duos or squads, embraces ragdoll physics and absurd encounters, prioritizes fun over winning. Motivation: To share laughs and chaotic moments with friends in an unserious battle royale. Stance: buy.
Nostalgic Revivalist: Played extensively in the past, now plays occasionally or encourages others to join; enjoys all modes but reminisces about better times. Motivation: Love for the game's unique concept and a desire to see the community revived. Stance: buy.
Solo Survivalist: Plays solo mode, lands away from hot drops, focuses on survival and self-reliance; advises others to do the same or bring trusted friends. Motivation: To enjoy the game independently, avoiding the frustrations of unreliable teammates and teaming players. Stance: buy.
Lower-VRAM Windows reviewers mostly report positive performance, while the higher-VRAM cohort's included feedback is negative due to poor optimization and freezing.
Windows <8GB VRAM: positive. Players report the game runs well with no performance issues, and some recommend launch options to improve CPU and GPU usage.
Windows 8-11GB VRAM: negative. A user reports that although the game is good, optimization is poor and the system freezes.
Steam Deck: The audit reveals severe technical barriers preventing the game from functioning on Linux and Steam Deck. The dominant themes are Easy Anti-Cheat (EAC) errors that have broken Linux compatibility, complete launch failures that persist even after installing all Proton layers, and significant optimization problems including 100% GPU usage. These issues align with the highest friction tier: anti-cheat errors and games that will not launch. Positive feedback on simple controls is heavily outweighed by the inability to run the title.
Linux and Proton: Linux and Proton support is effectively non-functional according to the available evidence. Users report that all Proton layers failed, the game stopped working on Linux, and an EAC patch made it unplayable. No review describes a successful Linux or Proton session, so the game is currently unsupported for Linux players.
Monetization: User reviews confirm the presence of an in-game cash shop requiring real money, described by one reviewer as a 'toxic mobile app style' shop. However, another review states the game is free and completely without pay-to-win, indicating the shop may be cosmetic or optional. No evidence of gacha, loot boxes, or pay-to-win mechanics was found. The monetization is assessed as standard with a cosmetic or optional shop, warranting a score in the lower-mid range.
Extremely low player population: The game suffers from a very small and often dead player base, with many noting low online counts, limited active hours, and difficulty finding matches. Server populations are typically around 30 players and rarely reach higher numbers.
Compared to PUBG: Reviewers often compare the game to PUBG, describing it as a silly or voxel parody with similar battle royale mechanics but more comfortable and faster gameplay, including bunny-hopping. It is seen as a substitute for PUBG.
Compared to Fortnite: The game is frequently compared to Fortnite, either as an alternative, a clone, or a better version due to its originality, lack of microtransactions, and goofy elements like giant bombs and ragdolls. Some call it a ripoff or Russian knockoff.
Developed by Landfall: The game is developed and published by Landfall (Landfall Games/Studios), known for other titles like Totally Accurate Battle Simulator. Reviewers frequently acknowledge the developer.
Abandoned by developer: The developer has stopped releasing updates, and the game appears abandoned with no plans for further content. It is no longer actively worked on.