
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
No data available
Review evidence
A realistic and educational hacking sim with engaging depth, but its short, linear design and copy-paste issues hold it back.
Realistic hacking simulation: Players praise the authenticity, with several calling it the most detailed and realistic hacking sim on Steam. The game accurately reflects real-world cybersecurity workflows.
Engaging and enjoyable game: Multiple players describe the game as fun, unique, and entertaining. The strong positive sentiment highlights broad appeal.
Fun gameplay with depth: Players find the game entertaining while also offering educational depth. It balances fun with learning effectively.
Excellent music and atmosphere: The soundtrack and atmospheric design are widely appreciated. Suggestions include starting music at lower volume for comfort.
Realistic tools and techniques: The game uses believable tools and methodology that reflect real offensive security processes, avoiding Hollywood clichés.
Game is too short: Players consistently report the game can be completed in around 2 hours, with some finishing in under 3 hours. This is seen as a major flaw given the price and expectations.
Too linear and guided: The game is heavily scripted with constant hand-holding, allowing no freedom or failure. Players feel like they are just clicking through a story.
Terminal copy-paste issues: The terminal lacks basic copy-paste functionality, frustrating players who need to transfer commands or data. This is a core gameplay complaint.
Lack of instructions for beginners: New players find some tasks unclear with missing hints. Meanwhile, some steps expect engineering knowledge, creating a steep learning curve.
AI-generated content quality: Multiple players note that dialogues, emails, and UI appear AI-generated, lacking human touch. This reduces credibility for a game about cybersecurity.
Educational hacking scenarios: Many reviews emphasize the educational value of the game, teaching real hacking techniques and cybersecurity concepts through scenario-based learning suitable for beginners.
Command-line hacking simulator: The game is centered around command-line and terminal interactions, simulating a hacking environment with tools like nmap and sqlmap, appealing to fans of technical gameplay.
Teaches real-world workflows: The game focuses on real-world security workflows and pentesting methodology, explaining methods and background behind attacks.
Problem-solving game: The game is considered a problem-solving experience that challenges players through hacking puzzles and exploitation tasks.
Short game duration: Multiple reviews note the short length of the game, with playtimes ranging from 2 to 4 hours, which may be a drawback for some players seeking longer experiences.
Alt+Tab causes system crashes: Using Alt+Tab results in stuck invisible windows that severely affect system stability. This is a critical technical bug.
Not recommended by some: A few players do not recommend the game, citing the need for a forced refund, lack of depth, or feeling it is not worth the time or money.
Good value for price: Players note the game offers great value for its price and is worth the money, with some calling it worth all the money.
Appeals to puzzle fans: The game is suited for players who enjoy puzzle games or have interest in hacking and cybersecurity themes.
Bugs are present: Some players recommend the game overall but note bugs, while others trust developers to fix issues despite them.
Despite issues, worth trying: Players advise trying the game as it won't be regretted, even with noted issues or a demo-like feel.
Game completion: 3.0h.
Story completion: 3.0h.
Cybersecurity Newcomer: Casual, exploratory, seeking simplicity and immediate enjoyment. Motivation: Easy, fun introduction to hacking and cybersecurity themes. Stance: buy.
Content-Driven Enthusiast: Goal-oriented, looking for achievements, branching stories, and sandbox freedom. Motivation: Desire for expanded content, progression systems, and narrative choice. Stance: buy.