Players are excited about the potential future developments and updates of the game. This includes the anticipation of new features, multiplayer capabilities, and mod support, which contribute to the overall evolution of the game.
Frustration stems from repetitive tasks in early missions and significant translation issues that hinder gameplay. Additionally, various bugs, including game-breaking ones, prevent players from completing tasks and progressing smoothly.
Players feel satisfied due to the active and responsive developers who quickly address bug fixes. The game's value for its price and the guidance provided also contribute to a sense of security and satisfaction.
There is a strong sense of appreciation towards the developers for their responsiveness to bug fixes and their interaction with the community. This active engagement makes players feel valued and heard.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 86% · Negative 14%. Score: 14 / 100
Positives:
The developers are highly active and responsive, frequently updating the game based on community feedback. They are quick to fix bugs and have plans for future updates, including multiplayer and mod support.
The game features a great story and campaign that players find enjoyable. The overall design and gameplay are fun, making it worth the price for fans of the genre.
The game is designed to be beginner-friendly without being hand-holding. It offers a good balance between complexity and accessibility, with an enjoyable learning curve that helps new players get started.
The game is often compared to Hacknet, with players finding it easier to learn and more engaging. It is recommended to players who have enjoyed Hacknet.
The gameplay rewards analysis and experimentation, encouraging players to think logically and reflectively without excessive simplification.
Negatives:
Players report significant translation problems, particularly with Chinese text, which affects gameplay and makes it difficult to search and understand job lists.
Several players have encountered game-breaking bugs, particularly in the Journalist questline, which prevent progress and completion of tasks.
There is a notable lack of guidance in some missions, and the absence of a new player tutorial makes it difficult for beginners to understand the game mechanics.
The initial missions are slow and involve repetitive tasks such as opening emails and searching for people, which can be tedious.
Players feel there is a lack of reward incentives, which reduces motivation to continue playing.
Gameplay:
The game features realistic hacking mechanics that involve using real commands and scenarios. Missions often require network-based reconnaissance and SQL queries, providing a complex and immersive experience.
The game takes a simulation approach rather than an arcade style, which comes with a learning curve. Players need to engage in self-exploration and use guidance to understand the complex network structures and tools.
The game offers story-driven gameplay with a coherent and credible progression. It also includes puzzle-based and objective-based gameplay, requiring critical thinking and puzzle-solving skills.
The interfaces in the game are faithful to real networks, and missions involve using tools and exploiting flaws. This adds to the complexity and realism of the gameplay.
The game includes in-game scripting and advanced user scripting, allowing players to create their own programs. This feature enhances the gameplay by providing tools for user-driven websites and customization.
Performance:
There are reports of the game crashing related to Node JS.
The developers are actively working on fixing bugs reported by players.
Recommendations:
-
No data available
Miscellaneous:
The game is mentioned to be in Early Access, indicating it is still in development and may have incomplete features or bugs.