
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
Nostalgic feel of Heroes 3: The game evokes a strong sense of nostalgia, reminiscent of the classic Heroes of Might and Magic III. Players appreciate the old-school feel and the mix of elements from previous games in the series.
Beautiful art style: The game's art style is widely praised for being beautiful, appealing, and high-quality. The visual style is considered one of the game's greatest strengths.
Positive game experience: Players generally enjoy the game, finding it engaging, fun, and well-made. The game is praised for its quality and enjoyable gameplay, with many players recommending it.
Developers listen to feedback: The development team is responsive to player feedback and actively engages with the community. Players appreciate that their opinions are considered and valued.
Positive reception and value: The game is well-received, with players expressing satisfaction and appreciation for its quality and value. The price is considered reasonable and worth the cost.
UI/UX issues and bugs: The game has various UI/UX issues, including unintuitive design and minor bugs that affect the overall user experience.
Early access shortcomings: The game is still in early access and has several shortcomings, including rough edges, minor issues, and a need for more development.
Crashing and technical issues: Players report game crashing bugs and occasional crashes, which significantly impact the gameplay experience.
AI and interface improvements needed: The AI needs more tuning to become smarter, and the interface requires improvements for better readability and intuitiveness.
Balancing and polish needed: The game requires balancing tweaks and additional polishing to improve the overall gameplay experience.
Diverse unit upgrade system: The game features a comprehensive unit upgrade system with multiple options for each unit, including hero class upgrades and alternative upgrade paths. This allows for varied and strategic customization of units.
Deep tactical gameplay: The game offers tactical battles with drag-and-drop units, emphasizing turn-based strategy and battle tactics. This core gameplay mechanic is highly praised by players.
Unique faction gameplay styles: Each faction in the game has unique gameplay styles and abilities, providing diverse strategic options and enhancing the game's depth.
Multiple engaging game modes: Players can enjoy several game modes, including built-in arena and single hero modes. This variety adds to the game's replayability and caters to different playstyle preferences.
Highly rated gameplay and sound: The gameplay and sound design are consistently rated highly by players, contributing to an overall exceptional gaming experience.
Good optimization and performance: Many players report that the game is well-optimized and runs smoothly across various systems, including Linux and Steam Deck. The performance is described as fantastic and buttery smooth.
High FPS and performance on various hardware: The game supports high FPS and runs well on a range of hardware, from low specs to high-end systems. Players have reported smooth performance on different setups.
Stable framerate with occasional crashes: The game generally maintains a stable framerate, but some players have experienced occasional crashes and freezes. These issues are not widespread but notable.
Screen and interface issues: There are reports of screen flickering, black screen issues, and interface buttons flashing or not working. These issues affect the visual and functional aspects of the game.
Slow loading times and specific bugs: Some players have noted slow loading times and specific bugs, such as issues with the mouse in Crossover 26 and keys not responding after the main screen.
Highly recommended for series fans: The game is strongly recommended for fans of the series, classic games, and the genre. It is considered a must-buy for those who grew up with previous installments.
General recommendations to buy: The game is generally recommended for purchase and support. It is considered worth buying and leaving a positive review.
Game has great potential: The game is praised for its strong foundation and potential to become the best in the series. It leaves a very positive impression and is seen as a worthy representative of the series.
Recommended for strategy fans: The game is recommended for fans of turn-based strategies and the Heroes series. It is also suggested for veterans of Heroes of Might and Magic 2 or 3.
Worth trying for new players: The game is recommended for both new and old players. It is suggested to give the game a chance and try it out for a few hours or through the demo.
Community fair range: $30.00 - $40.00.
Game completion: 170.0h.
Story completion: 10.0h.
Session length: 3.0h.
The game is enjoyable from the start, especially in multiplayer modes, but the lack of co-op multiplayer is a significant friction point that players are eagerly awaiting to be resolved.
Reported time to anchor: 24h.
Friction: Lack of co-op multiplayer; Incomplete features.
Competitive Strategist: Deep strategic planning and competitive multiplayer. Motivation: Mastery and competition. Stance: buy.
Enthusiastic Adventurer: Casual and exploratory. Motivation: Enjoyment and adventure. Stance: buy.
Reserved Explorer: Exploratory with reservations. Motivation: Exploration and nostalgia. Stance: sale.
The game generally performs well on higher-end hardware with sufficient VRAM, while lower-end systems experience more instability and crashes. High VRAM configurations report smooth performance and high frame rates, whereas lower VRAM setups, particularly those with less than 8GB, face more frequent issues.
Windows 8-11GB VRAM: positive. Mostly smooth performance with high frame rates, though some users report crashes.
Windows 12-15GB VRAM / 16-31GB RAM: positive. Smooth performance with no reported issues.
Windows <8GB VRAM / 16-31GB RAM: mixed. Mixed reports with some users experiencing crashes and instability, while others report smooth performance.
Steam Deck: The game generally receives positive feedback for its performance and optimization on the Steam Deck. Users appreciate the lack of DRM and additional launchers. However, there are notable issues with stability, including crashes and interface problems, which significantly impact the user experience. Additionally, some users find the UI and controls challenging to navigate on the Steam Deck.
Linux and Proton: The game generally receives positive feedback for its compatibility and performance on Linux. Most users report that it runs well, both natively and through Proton. However, there are isolated reports of graphical glitches and interface issues that affect the user experience. Overall, the consensus is that the game works well on Linux with minor issues reported by a few users.
Monetization: Reviews explicitly mention no microtransactions.
External guides: The analysis of user feedback reveals several critical areas for improvement. The most prominent issues include the lack of an in-game encyclopedia, which is essential for players to understand game mechanics and content. Additionally, users have highlighted the need for better explanations of complex mechanics, such as special job advancements and skill learning. Technical issues, particularly frequent crashes during common actions, have also been noted as a significant concern. Addressing these issues can greatly enhance the user experience and satisfaction with the game.
Add time acceleration button: Players have suggested the addition of a time acceleration button to speed up battles.
Introduce more new races: There is a desire among players for the game to include a greater variety of new races.
Separate window for unit art and lore: Players have requested a separate window that provides detailed art and lore descriptions for units.