Gears of War: E-Day Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-10-03
  • Fun and visually stunning experience
  • Solid gameplay with smooth handling
  • Campaign and multiplayer modes included
  • Frequent crashes and performance issues
  • Poor AI teammates and matchmaking problems
  • Strong recommend for Gears fans
Gears of War: E-Day header

Emotions

Archetypes

Hardware

Windows 12-15GB VRAMmixedWindows 8-11GB VRAMnegative

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

Visually stunning, fun, smooth gameplay with campaign and multiplayer, but crashes, performance issues, poor AI, and matchmaking trouble still make it a strong Gears fan pick.

What players like

Game praised as fun and beautiful: Players frequently describe the game as fun, beautiful, and visually incredible. Many highlight the gameplay mechanics as really fun and the overall experience as a banger.

Stunning and impressive visuals: Visuals are repeatedly called stunning, graphically impressive, and top tier. Animations and scenarios look amazing, contributing to a visually great experience.

Solid gameplay and smooth handling: Reviewers find the gameplay good, smooth, and solid overall. The handling feels good, and many are enjoying the game so far.

Return to form for Gears series: Fans consider this a good return to form, with some calling it the best Gears since Gears of War 3. The return to the 'Gears of War' title is appreciated.

Feels like classic Gears of War: The game captures the old Gears feeling while modernizing gameplay. Many say it feels like a proper Gears of War game and a return to form.

Common complaints

Performance and Optimization Issues: Many players experience poor performance and frame rate drops regardless of graphics settings, even on low settings. The game requires significant optimization improvements to run smoothly.

Voiceover Language Restrictions: Voiceover language is tied to the text language, preventing players from selecting English voice acting separately or changing voiceover without changing the entire language setting.

Versus Mode Matchmaking Issues: Versus mode lacks proper matchmaking options and ranked mode, with only a quick play list available. Players cannot search for specific game modes, leading to a poor multiplayer experience.

Poor AI Teammates: AI teammates in solo campaign and Horde mode are criticized for being dumb, unhelpful, and often getting stuck or failing to revive quickly. This significantly detracts from the solo experience.

Unmemorable Campaign: The campaign is considered not as epic as previous Gears of War titles and lacks memorable moments, failing to live up to the series' standards.

Gameplay and performance

Campaign and Multiplayer Modes: The game includes both a story campaign and multiplayer components. Campaign can be played solo or cooperatively, while multiplayer offers competitive and cooperative experiences.

Horde Mode Variants Available: A Horde mode is present, with some references to a classic Horde mode possibly missing. It allows different squads to assist each other and includes buildables, AI teammates, and objectives.

Four-Player Cooperative Campaign: The campaign supports co-op play for up to four players, including online co-op and playing with friends. This is a key feature for team-based gameplay.

Horde Siege PvE Mode: A specific PvE mode called Horde Siege is included, where teammates can leave and be replaced by AI. It features maps, customization options for builds and playstyles, and large maps with boss fights.

Semi-Open-World Campaign Areas: The campaign includes semi-open-world areas with repeating zones. This structure allows for exploration within the story missions.

Frequent crashes reported: Many players report constant crashing across different hardware and game modes. Issues include random crashes, crashes during campaign, versus, and horde siege, and crashes after a few hours of play.

Mixed optimization feedback: Opinions on optimization are split: some find the game well-optimized and smooth, while others report poor performance and stutters. Performance varies widely depending on hardware and settings.

Variable performance across hardware: Performance varies greatly depending on hardware: some achieve high FPS at 1440p or 4K, while others struggle even on high-end rigs. Specific configurations yield a wide range of results.

Freezing requires restart: Players experience intermittent freezing that forces a game restart. Freezes occur after set playtime, during cutscenes, or randomly every 10-25 minutes.

FPS drops and stutters: Sudden FPS drops and hard stutters are common, even on capable systems and low settings. Drops can be severe, such as from 200 to 40 FPS or 80 to 7 FPS.

Recommendations

Strong recommend for Gears fans: Many reviewers say any Gears of War fan or third-person shooter fan will love this game and should not miss it. These recommendations are enthusiastic and tie enjoyment directly to the franchise.

Buy it, easy recommendation: A large number of brief review comments simply say to buy the game or highly recommend it with no serious reservations. These are concise, enthusiastic endorsements.

Great entry point for newcomers: Reviewers repeatedly call this a good gateway for players new to the Gears of War universe. It is recommended for those trying the series for the first time and for sampling the shooter portion.

Nostalgic return to roots: Longtime fans describe the game as a return to the good old days and a throwback to the original trilogy. Nostalgia for Gears of War 1 and 2 is a recurring reason for recommending it.

Refund and do not buy: A notable group of reviewers explicitly say do not buy, refund the game, or instantly refund it. These are strong negative purchase recommendations, sometimes tied to performance or value concerns.

Buying context

Community fair range: $30.00 - $50.00.

Game completion: 19.0h.

Story completion: 12.5h.

Session length: 7.0h.

Endgame: 40.0h.

Broadly, players report fun from the start, especially in campaign, co-op, and early Act 1, with the first hour explicitly called jaw-dropping or amazing. Multiplayer and Horde draw vocal criticism and technical friction, so the immediate hook is strongest for campaign and co-op players rather than a universal PvP-first experience.

Friction: Shader compilation/loading creates an early delay.; PVP is sweaty/intense and not for all players.; New movement controls require adjustment.; Bugs and technical issues remain.; Campaign travel between fights can feel slower than the combat.; Co-op free-roam can teleport players back if they stray too far..

Player profiles

Gears Franchise Veteran: Compares E-Day against older Gears titles, plays campaign and multiplayer modes, and expects classic Gears pacing, modes, and tone. Motivation: Nostalgia and seeing the series return to its classic Gears identity after uneven recent entries. Stance: buy.

Competitive PvP Sweat: Plays aggressive, movement-heavy 5v5 PvP, cares about ranked, map design, and shotgunning duels. Motivation: Competitive multiplayer mastery, ranked play, and the familiar sweaty Gears PvP rhythm. Stance: buy.

Co-op Horde/PvE Grinder: Focuses on Horde Siege and PvE, often solo or with one friend, grinding progression and unlocking free cosmetics. Motivation: Cooperative PvE progression, earning cosmetics and weapon parts, and enjoying Horde Siege with friends or solo. Stance: buy.

Platform notes

Performance varies widely by cohort: Linux/Proton and some high-VRAM Windows systems run well, but many Windows configurations report crashes, freezes, stutters, and optimization issues, especially with 8-11GB VRAM and 16-31GB RAM.

Windows 12-15GB VRAM: mixed. Reports are split between smooth high-FPS play after patches and frequent crashes or instability, with open areas noted as more demanding and better with Frame Generation.

Windows 8-11GB VRAM: negative. This cohort mostly reports stutters, CPU bottlenecks, hard freezes, and frequent crashes, with even recommended reviews noting the game needs optimization fixes.

Windows 16GB+ VRAM / 32GB+ RAM: mixed. Many users report excellent visuals and smooth 100 FPS performance with DLSS and Frame Generation, but crashes, memory leaks, periodic freezes, and forced frame generation remain significant complaints.

Steam Deck: User feedback for this UE5 title on Steam Deck and SteamOS is dominated by stability and optimization failures. The most impactful themes are frequent crashes and hard freezes (including co-op host disconnects), shader compilation that reruns on every boot and can take over ten minutes, and an anti-cheat token renewal that fails on a fixed 2-3 hour interval and freezes the game while cutting GPU utilization. Direct Steam Deck impressions describe the game as still far from playable, with UE5 optimization cited as the root cause; the campaign is also always-online. On the positive side, several users confirm it runs smoothly under Proton/SteamOS with FSR4 on capable desktop hardware, showing the compatibility layer works and the blockers are anti-cheat and performance rather than launcher or Proton tweaks. Per the scoring criteria, the presence of frequent crashes and anti-cheat errors places this firmly in the broken tier.

Linux and Proton: Linux/Proton evidence is mixed but leans workable. Direct reports say the game runs smoothly under Proton with FSR4 and smoothly on SteamOS. At the same time, Steam Deck-specific feedback notes poor performance and playability, including one report that it is still far from playable. No anti-cheat, launcher, DRM, or tinkering blockers are described in the relevant Linux/Proton evidence.

Extra review signals

Monetization: The reviews confirm a real-money storefront with cosmetic weapon skins, purchase packs, an 'iron' currency, and purchasable DLC characters. At the same time, players explicitly report no pay-to-win and describe the microtransactions as not extreme. The evidence supports standard cosmetic-focused monetization rather than predatory gacha, loot boxes, or power sales.

Other review notes

Favorable comparison to classic Gears: Many reviewers compare the game favorably to Gears of War 1, 2, and 3, often calling it the best since Gears 3. Some consider it on par with the original trilogy or even superior.

Improvement over Gears 4 and 5: Several reviewers state the game is a huge improvement over Gears 4 and 5, describing it as miles better. The story is seen as a step up from those entries.

Prequel covering E-Day: The game is a prequel to the original Gears of War series, telling the origins of E-Day. This event is a defining moment in the Gears universe.

Early access availability: Reviewers mention that the game was available in early access and that they purchased the early access version. This indicates a phased release.

Movement system compared to Gears: Reviewers compare the movement system to Gears 1 and note that Gears 5 has better movement. This suggests the movement may feel dated or less refined.