
Verdict
Mostly negative
Summary
Positive 45% · Negative 55%. Score: 55 / 100
Verdict
Fair Monetization
Summary
The game is generally well-received for its lack of pay-to-win mechanics and its focus on cosmetic-only microtransactions. While there is criticism of other games and companies for being cash grabs, the game itself is praised for its fair monetization practices. Users are willing to purchase DLC and additional content, indicating a positive reception to the game's monetization strategy. Score: 25 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Needs Improvement
Summary
The primary issues identified from user feedback include significant navigation problems, technical issues, and a lack of in-game guidance. These issues severely impact the user experience, often requiring players to rely on external resources to progress or understand the game. Score: 10 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Tinkering Required
Summary
The analysis of user feedback for the Steam Deck experience reveals significant issues with the EA App, multiplayer and anti-cheat problems, and various technical bugs. Despite these challenges, many users appreciate the gameplay experience. The game's compatibility with Steam Deck is mixed, with some users facing considerable friction. The EA App and multiplayer issues are the most impactful themes, causing high severity problems for users. Score: 55 / 100
Top points
Positives:
Negatives:
Gameplay:
Performance:
Recommendations:
Miscellaneous: