Players experience satisfaction due to the game's well-balanced difficulty progression, meaningful moral dilemmas, and the sense of accomplishment from mastering mechanics like document verification. The ability to see tangible consequences from in-game actions, such as improving family life or achieving high efficiency, further enhances this emotion.
Frustration stems from the game's steep initial learning curve, repetitive and tedious document-checking tasks, and punishing mechanics like penalties for minor mistakes. Technical issues, such as bugs on the Steam Deck, and the overwhelming workload during later stages also contribute to this emotion.
Players find amusement in the game's dark humor, absurd bureaucratic scenarios, and quirky character interactions. The satirical portrayal of bureaucracy, unexpected consequences for actions, and playful tone create moments of levity and entertainment.
Admiration arises from the game's unique and immersive design, including its minimalist aesthetics, thematic depth, and ability to explore complex moral choices through simple mechanics. Players praise its originality, emotional impact, and the craftsmanship behind its storytelling and gameplay.
Enjoyment is driven by the game's fun and engaging gameplay loop, replayability due to multiple endings, and the immersive atmosphere created by its music and narrative. Players appreciate the variety of events and the overall positive experience it provides.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 93% · Negative 7%. Score: 7 / 100
Positives:
Players consistently highlight the game's deep moral dilemmas and choices as a core strength, emphasizing their impact on gameplay and replayability. These decisions add emotional weight and provoke thought, making the experience uniquely engaging.
Players frequently describe the gameplay as addictive, with a loop that balances efficiency, accuracy, and moral decision-making. The endless mode and varied outcomes are highlighted as key factors in its long-term appeal.
The game's 20+ possible endings are frequently cited as a major factor in its high replay value. Players appreciate the diversity of outcomes and the curiosity to explore alternative paths, which extends the game's longevity.
The game's simple yet effective graphics, sound design, and bleak atmosphere create deep immersion. Players describe the experience as tense, realistic, and emotionally resonant, often praising the minimalist visuals and audio for heightening the mood.
The game's storytelling is lauded for its ability to convey deep themes and emotional weight through simple interactions, small dialogues, and branching paths. Players appreciate the rich worldbuilding and character depth despite the minimalist approach.
Negatives:
The game is widely criticized for inducing stress and frustration, often due to time pressure, harsh penalties for minor mistakes, and an oppressive atmosphere. Many players report it feeling like 'real work' rather than entertainment.
The game’s main story is relatively short (e.g., 6 hours for the main ending), and players seeking depth or variety may find the content lacking, particularly if they are not completionists.
The game’s narrative and mechanics are criticized for their bleak portrayal of bureaucracy and survival, with themes of exploitation and poor working conditions resonating negatively. Some players find the themes watered-down or heavy-handed.
Players face severe consequences for minor errors (e.g., typographical mistakes or incorrect document details), which can feel unfair or overly punitive, especially when the cause of failure isn’t immediately clear.
While some appreciate the pixel art style, others find it unappealing, unclear, or inadequate for the game’s themes. The lack of voice acting and low-quality visuals further detract from immersion for certain players.
Gameplay:
Gameplay revolves around verifying documents like passports and permits under time pressure, with penalties for errors. This mechanic evolves in complexity, requiring attention to detail and adherence to strict rules.
The game emphasizes story-driven gameplay with unique NPC interactions, character backstories, and dialogue-based progression. Choices influence narrative paths, creating a deeply immersive experience.
Players role-play as border control officers, checking documents and enforcing government protocols. The simulation includes themes of bureaucracy, fraud detection, and the moral weight of authority in a totalitarian setting.
The game introduces new rules and increasing complexity daily, requiring players to adapt quickly. Difficulty scales with tasks like document verification and NPC interactions, demanding heightened concentration.
Players must manage in-game family needs, such as food and heating, adding urgency to decisions. This mechanic ties into moral dilemmas and resource management, heightening emotional stakes.
Performance:
While the game is verified for Steam Deck, players report bugs after prolonged use (e.g., 20 days) and prefer using a mouse for better accuracy and speed. Handheld mode is functional but not ideal for fast gameplay.
Feedback on technical performance is divided, with some players reporting no issues and smooth gameplay, while others mention optimization problems and general technical instability.
Players experience glitches where documents become uncontrollable or fly around unpredictably, disrupting gameplay and immersion.
A recurring technical issue where full-screen mode does not function as expected, potentially affecting user experience on certain devices.
The game's small file size (comparable to a floppy disk) is noted as a positive, making it easy to download and install even on limited storage devices.
Recommendations:
The game is strongly recommended for players who enjoy narrative-driven experiences, ethical dilemmas, and thought-provoking gameplay. Its uniqueness and depth make it a standout indie title, particularly for fans of decision-making and puzzle-like mechanics.
The game appeals to players who enjoy challenging themselves with complex, detail-oriented gameplay. It is particularly suited for those who appreciate attention to detail and strategic thinking.
The game is praised for its depth, replay value, and multiple endings, making it a worthwhile purchase. Players highlight its dynamics and achievement-friendly structure as key reasons for its value.
The game is widely regarded as a masterpiece, earning high ratings (8-10/10) and praise for its originality. However, some players note minor shortcomings or suggest improvements, such as better tracking of endings.
The game’s complex themes, slow pacing, and bleak tone make it more suitable for teens and adults. It is particularly recommended for those interested in history, politics, and dystopian settings.
Miscellaneous:
The game has won multiple awards at the Independent Games Festival and is widely regarded as a masterpiece of the indie genre, with a 97% 'Overwhelmingly Positive' rating on Steam. This highlights its exceptional quality and broad recognition.
The game features strong political commentary, critiquing societal compliance and drawing inspiration from post-WWII Eastern Bloc countries. This thematic depth resonates with players interested in narrative-driven experiences.
Players note that the game requires significant brainpower, making it challenging and engaging for those seeking intellectual stimulation. This aligns with its puzzle-heavy design.
A notable drawback is the lack of mod workshop support, which limits player creativity and community-driven content expansion. This is a frequent request among fans.
Players appreciate the game's minimalist design, which contrasts with the complexity of modern games. This simplicity enhances immersion and focus on core gameplay.