War Thunder Review Summary

Last updated: 2025-02-23
  • Visually stunning, immersive military experience.
  • Huge, historically diverse vehicle selection.
  • Addictive gameplay despite numerous issues.
  • Unbalanced matchmaking and vehicle stats.
  • Poor map design exacerbates balance issues.
  • Predatory monetization ruins the experience.
War Thunder header

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Visually stunning, immersive experience: The game boasts impressive graphics, detailed vehicle models, realistic sound design, and immersive environments. These elements combine to create an engaging and authentic combat experience across air, land, and sea. The attention to detail enhances the overall atmosphere and contributes to the game's appeal.

Huge vehicle selection, historically diverse: The game features a vast selection of vehicles across air, land, and sea, spanning multiple historical eras. This extensive roster provides players with diverse gameplay options and encourages experimentation with different strategies and playstyles. The variety keeps the game fresh and engaging.

Realistic mechanics, flexible difficulty: The game offers a blend of realistic physics, ballistics, and damage models, providing an authentic combat simulation. Players can choose between different difficulty levels, from arcade-style action to more challenging realistic and simulator modes. This balance caters to both casual and hardcore players.

Regular updates, active community: The game receives regular updates with new content, events, and improvements, keeping the experience fresh and engaging. The active community and long-term support contribute to the game's enduring appeal. Players appreciate the continuous effort to expand and refine the game.

Initially engaging, rewarding progression: The game is initially appealing and provides a rewarding sense of progression as players unlock new vehicles and master their mechanics. While premium options exist, the core gameplay is accessible without spending money, allowing players to explore the game before investing. The game is more "pay to skip" than "pay to win".

Common complaints

Unbalanced matchmaking and vehicle stats: The game suffers from severe imbalance issues, including inconsistent vehicle battle ratings, frequent uptiers against stronger opponents, and disproportionately powerful nations/vehicles. This creates frustrating, one-sided matches, especially for new players facing experienced players with fully upgraded or premium vehicles. Some reviews show signs of review bombing.

Poor and unbalanced map design: Many reviewers criticize the map design for being poorly designed, too small or too large, lacking cover, and encouraging spawn camping. This leads to frustrating gameplay experiences where players are killed shortly after spawning or are forced into predictable, repetitive engagements. The maps also suffer from collision issues and excessive clutter.

Numerous bugs and inconsistent mechanics: The game suffers from numerous bugs and inconsistencies, including illogical vehicle balance, ghost shells, volumetric armor issues, and inconsistent damage models. These issues detract from the game's realism and create frustrating gameplay experiences where outcomes feel random and unpredictable.

Vehicle and nation balance issues: The game has balance issues between different vehicle types and nations, with some vehicles being overpowered and others underpowered. This leads to unfair matches and frustration, particularly with aircraft dominating ground battles and certain nations having superior vehicles. There is also a perception of Russian bias.

Technical issues, outdated graphics/sound: The game suffers from technical issues, including poor sound design, outdated graphics, lag spikes, and a clunky user interface. These issues detract from the overall gameplay experience and make it difficult to spot enemies and maintain situational awareness.

Gameplay and performance

Combined arms, varied game modes: War Thunder features combined arms gameplay across air, land, and sea, offering diverse experiences from aerial dogfights to tank battles and naval skirmishes. The game includes multiple modes (Arcade, Realistic, and Simulator) with varying levels of realism and difficulty, catering to different player preferences and skill levels. Battles take place across historical settings and eras, featuring a wide array of vehicles from World War II to modern times.

Varied realism levels, control schemes: War Thunder offers Arcade, Realistic, and Simulator modes, each with different physics, realism, and control complexity. Arcade mode is beginner-friendly with simplified controls, while Realistic and Simulator modes demand more skill and knowledge. Realistic battles remove aim assist and require visual identification of enemies, while Simulator battles offer the most immersive experience with no HUD or third-person view.

Tactical gameplay, weak spot knowledge: Success in tank battles requires knowledge of enemy armor weak spots, shell types, and map layouts. Angling the tank and exploiting situational advantages are essential for survival. In urban combat, mobility and firepower are more important than armor, and flanking and ambushing enemies can be effective.

Aircraft dominance, ground imbalance: Aircraft can significantly impact ground battles, often dominating matches and frustrating tank players. Tank players have limited options to defend themselves against air attacks, leading to an imbalance in gameplay. Air battles at top tier are dominated by beyond visual range (BVR) combat, which some players find boring.

Inconsistent damage modeling, RNG: The game's damage modeling can feel inconsistent and arbitrary, with realistic hits sometimes being shrugged off while single shots cause catastrophic damage. The effectiveness of shrapnel mechanics is also inconsistent. These inconsistencies, combined with clunky controls, can make the game feel more like an arcade shooter than a true simulation.

Inconsistent performance and optimization: The game's performance and optimization are inconsistent. Some players report smooth gameplay even on older or lower-end PCs, while others experience stuttering, frame drops, crashes, and long loading times, even on high-end systems. The game also has a large install size.

Various graphical glitches: Players are reporting a variety of graphical glitches and inconsistencies, including random texture loss, disappearing or floating enemies, and visual oddities on maps.

Hit registration problems: Players report issues with hit registration, including ghost shells (shells that pass through targets without registering a hit) and rounds that appear to hit the player despite flying overhead.

No Oceania server: War Thunder lacks a dedicated server for the Oceania region, resulting in high latency and poor gameplay experiences for players in that area.

Cluttered, unintuitive UI: The user interface is described as cluttered, unintuitive, and difficult to navigate, hindering the player experience.

Recommendations

Predatory monetization ruins experience: The game's monetization is predatory, relying on a heavy grind and selling shortcuts, leading to an unbalanced and frustrating experience. Many reviewers advise caution or outright avoidance, citing a 'pay-to-win' model that prioritizes profit over fair gameplay. Some reviewers express feeling manipulated and exploited by the game's design.

Numerous issues plague gameplay: The game suffers from numerous issues, including poor balance, bad maps, server problems, and a toxic community. Reviewers report frustration with imbalance, missing vehicles, equipment issues, and uncooperative players. These problems contribute to a negative gaming experience.

Game is highly addictive: Many reviewers warn of the game's addictive nature, comparing it to a 'black hole' that consumes time and money. Some express regret and self-hatred for being unable to stop playing despite disliking the game. This point highlights the game's potential to negatively impact players' lives.

Little hope for improvement: Many reviewers express a lack of hope for the game's future, citing developer apathy and a focus on monetization over improvement. Some reviewers are quitting the game, regretting their investment of time and money. This point reflects a widespread sense of disillusionment among players.

Unique, immersive military experience: The game offers a unique combined arms experience with a wide variety of vehicles and historical settings, appealing to military history enthusiasts. Reviewers praise the game's attention to detail, diverse vehicle selection, and the ability to engage in air, land, and sea battles. This point highlights the game's strengths in providing a comprehensive military simulation.

Other review notes

Inaccurate historical representation, clones: The game advertises itself as historical, but vehicles are arbitrarily made less historical to adjust their power. Additionally, some 'upgrades' can have worse stats, and other tech trees are full of clones of the same vehicles, making it pointless to level different nations.

Detailed vehicles, regular content updates: War Thunder boasts a vast selection of meticulously crafted vehicles from various nations and eras, appealing to military technology enthusiasts. The game receives regular updates with new content, vehicles, and improvements, and has a vibrant community that supports user-created content.

Large game size, decent PC required: War Thunder requires a decent PC to run, and the game size is immense, with vast maps that allow for strategic gameplay. The game size will eat 10% of a 1TB hard drive.

Suitable for teens and adults: The game is suitable for teens and adults.

Developers try to fix problems: The reviewer mentions that developers are trying to fix problems, consider user complaints, and try to develop the game. Constructive discussions about the game are valuable for its growth and improvement.