
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
Engaging gameplay and clever puzzles with appealing visuals, but frustrating boss fights, janky controls, and confusing level design hold it back.
Game is fun and engaging: Players consistently describe the game as fun, addictive, and satisfying with a good balance of challenge and entertainment. The platforming and puzzle elements are highlighted as particularly enjoyable.
Clever puzzle designs: Various clusters praise the puzzles for being clever, logical, and satisfying without being overly difficult. Specific mechanics like magnetism and polarity are noted as interesting and brain-teasing.
Visuals are appealing: The game's visual presentation is praised for being stylish, cute, and visually pleasing, with attractive art and effects. The remaster improves graphics and animations, enhancing the hand-drawn aesthetic.
Good and simple story: The story is simple and easy to follow, told in a creative way through locations and visual storytelling without dialogue. It is entertaining and interesting, though not complex.
Platforming is well executed: The game is considered a worthy platformer with good mechanics, fun movement, and a satisfying level of challenge. The platforming feels solid and contributes to the overall positive experience.
Boss fights are frustrating: Players consistently report that boss fights are the most frustrating part of the game, citing poor design and frustrating mechanics. This sentiment is echoed across multiple clusters, indicating a widespread issue.
Controls and movement janky: Multiple clusters describe the movement and controls as janky, clunky, and unpredictable. Issues with physics and air control make platforming and general navigation feel unresponsive.
Level design confusing: Players find the level design confusing, with unclear objectives and frustrating layouts. This contributes to a poor overall experience, as navigation becomes a major obstacle.
Game difficulty frustrating: The game's difficulty is perceived as unfair and unnecessarily high, with one-hit deaths and precision requirements that feel excessive. This leads to frustration rather than a rewarding challenge.
Lack of story and explanation: The game provides minimal story and does not explain mechanics, forcing players to experiment. This lack of guidance confuses players and reduces engagement.
Magnet-based puzzle platformer: The game is consistently described as a physics-based puzzle platformer centered on magnetism and polarity mechanics. Players use red and blue polarity to attract or repel objects for traversal and puzzle solving.
Puzzle-solving core gameplay: The game is heavily focused on puzzle-solving, with many reviewers calling it primarily a puzzle game. Puzzles are integrated into level design and often use magnetism and electricity.
Metroidvania with backtracking: Many reviews identify the game as a Metroidvania or having light Metroidvania elements, featuring non-linear maps, backtracking, and ability-gated progression. It is often described as short and fairly linear unless pursuing the true ending.
Platformer with puzzle elements: The game is a platformer with puzzle elements, often described as a puzzle-platformer. This classification is consistent across many reviews.
Boss fights with instant death: Boss battles are a common feature, and they often kill the player in one hit, adding tension. Some bosses are puzzle-like and diverse, requiring timing and pattern recognition.
GPU overheating due to poor optimization: Players report that the GPU runs at 100% usage, causing the computer to overheat. This is likely due to suboptimal optimization in the game.
Occasional physics glitches occur: Some players have experienced intermittent physics glitches during gameplay, which can disrupt immersion and cause minor frustration.
Recommended overall: Multiple reviews positively recommend the game, calling it solid, excellent, and very good. It is seen as a quality experience for puzzle platformer fans.
Worth it on sale: Several reviewers advise buying the game when it is discounted or part of a bundle, noting frequent promotions and significant discounts. This makes it a better value proposition.
Demanding difficulty: The game is described as very challenging, with one-hit deaths and trial-and-error gameplay that requires patience. It is recommended only for players who enjoy such difficulty.
Not recommended without fixes: Some reviewers do not recommend the game due to frustrating gameplay, control issues, and a problematic save system, particularly affecting enjoyment. They suggest waiting for improvements or skipping entirely.
Story and art style appeal: The game is recommended for those who appreciate its story and art style, and it is considered suitable for such fans. This aspect is a key draw.
Community fair range: $5.00 - $10.00.
Game completion: 6.0h.
Story completion: 3.0h.
Teslagrad Remastered delivers immediate fun through its magnetic puzzle mechanics and steady progression, though some players encounter early friction from confusing maps and tedious segments.
Friction: Confusing map with multiple exits; Tedious and slow puzzle pacing; Tedious boss encounters requiring corralling.
Achievement Hunter: Rushes through levels searching for collectibles, uses guides, prioritizes achievement unlocks over exploration. Motivation: Completing all achievements and reaching 100% completion. Stance: buy.
Puzzle Enthusiast: Focuses on puzzle mechanics, analyzes level layouts, tolerates platforming frustration for the sake of puzzle satisfaction. Motivation: Solving creative puzzles and experiencing atmospheric design. Stance: buy.
Cautious Newcomer: Plays casually, gets stuck easily, gives up when progress is lost due to sparse saving. Motivation: Enjoying atmosphere and story without punishing difficulty. Stance: no buy.
Compares to sequel Teslagrad 2: Many reviewers compare this game to its sequel, Teslagrad 2, noting that the sequel is more enjoyable and fixes problems present in the original. Some plan to play or hope the sequel is better.
Very short game length: The game is consistently described as short, with playtimes ranging from about 3 to 4 hours for a normal completion, and under 6 hours for full completion. Several reviewers mention it can be completed in a day.
Remaster offers minimal changes: Multiple reviewers note that this remaster of Teslagrad has largely unchanged graphics and gameplay compared to the original 2013 release. It is essentially the same core content with only minor visual improvements.
Collectibles tied to achievements: All achievements are linked to collecting hidden batteries or cards, and the map only shows battery locations near the end. Collecting all 36 collectibles unlocks a true ending, but many found it not worth the effort.
Visual storytelling without dialogue: The story and lore are conveyed entirely through visuals and in-game illustrations, with no dialogue or text explanations. This includes the use of Norse runes and a Soviet-inspired aesthetic.