ZeroSpace Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-07-21
  • Engaging and satisfying gameplay
  • Promising early access release
  • Innovative RTS genre revival
  • UI needs improvement
  • Pathfinding and unit issues
  • Buggy and broken experience
ZeroSpace header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

  • -

    No data available

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

Engaging and satisfying gameplay with innovative RTS revival, but the early access release suffers from buggy pathfinding, unit issues, and a UI that needs improvement.

What players like

Engaging and satisfying gameplay: Players find the game fun and enjoyable, with comments highlighting smooth combat, intense memorable games, and a satisfying core experience.

Promising early access: Despite being in early access, the game shows potential with solid stability, developer care, and community involvement.

Innovative RTS revival: The game is praised for bringing new life to the RTS genre with cool mechanics, unique ideas like the galactic war concept, and moving beyond old strategies.

Rich content variety: The game offers extensive content including campaign, PvP, co-op modes, and many maps, appealing to different playstyles.

Engaging story and campaign: The campaign is highlighted for its quality, great cutscenes, meaningful decisions, and being one of the best stories in RTS.

Common complaints

UI needs improvement: The user interface is frequently criticized as shoddy, misaligned, and lacking essential features like a close button or accessible menu. Example issues include a start button pushed off screen and missing settings panels.

Pathfinding and unit issues: Units are described as dumb with poor pathfinding, floating unnaturally regardless of size, and requiring no tactics to win by simply setting rally points on the enemy base. This undermines strategic depth.

Buggy and broken: Multiple reviewers report frequent bugs and broken mechanics, making the game feel raw and unfinished. References include specific mention of general bugginess and a frustrating initial experience.

Long development timeline: Reviewers note that the game is still in early access with a long time expected before reaching version 1.0, which may frustrate players seeking a complete product.

Poor value for money: The game's $40/€ price tag is considered too high for an early access product that feels unpolished and lacking quality. Reviewers also question the overall value relative to the experience offered.

Gameplay and performance

Core RTS gameplay: The game is an RTS with base building, unit commanding, four races, and modes including versus, co-op, and campaign. It draws mechanics from StarCraft and Command & Conquer.

RPG elements in RTS: The game blends RTS with RPG touches, such as hero units that supplement armies and a story with weighty decisions. This adds depth to the strategy experience.

Varied game modes: Multiple modes of play are available, including 1v1 competitive and a galactic war co-op mode. This provides diverse gameplay options for different preferences.

Accessible for newcomers: The game features simplified UI for building grouping and unit management, along with onboarding for RTS newbies. This lowers the barrier to entry for the genre.

StarCraft-like army control: Army control is akin to Blizzard RTS games like StarCraft, ensuring familiar mechanics for genre veterans. This maintains a high skill ceiling.

Game stability is good: A single user praised the game for good stability and reported experiencing no crashes during play. This suggests the game may be stable for some configurations, though it is a solitary positive note.

Optimization is terrible: One user described the optimization as terrible, indicating poor performance or frame rate issues. This feedback is limited to a single negative comment without further detail.

Recommendations

Mixed recommendations overall: Feedback is polarized: some players strongly recommend the game, while others advise against purchasing it. The positive reviews highlight its value for RTS fans, whereas negative ones call it a waste of time.

Successor to Starcraft 2: Some consider this game the best current successor to Starcraft 2, appealing to fans of that franchise. It provides a similar deep competitive experience for those with an SC2 background preferring no-hero gameplay.

Player profiles

Newcomer-Friendly RTS Learner: Likely focuses on single-player or casual modes to learn at own pace. Motivation: Learning the RTS genre without overwhelming complexity. Stance: buy.

Co-op Enthusiast: Primarily plays co-op mode, possibly with friends or random allies. Motivation: Enjoying cooperative gameplay with others, especially the galactic map system. Stance: buy.

Competitive 1v1 Player: Mainly plays 1v1 versus, likely engages in ranked or ladder play. Motivation: Seeking a deep and satisfying competitive 1v1 RTS experience. Stance: buy.