
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
No data available
Recommendations:
Other player notes:












Review evidence
A worthy sequel with lovable characters and meaningful carryover choices, but the engaging story gets confusing and outcomes feel forced despite stats.
Worthy sequel to original: Players consistently praise the game as a great and worthy continuation of the first game, with several noting it is as well crafted and amazing as the original. The sequel expands on the first game's story and focuses on grey morality.
Well-written and lovable characters: Characters are consistently praised as lovable, endearing, and well written, with new characters also receiving positive feedback. The character development is considered good, and relationships are just as good as before.
Choices carry over meaningfully: A significant number of reviewers highlight that progress and choices from the first game carry over and matter, with the save import system working seamlessly. This faithful portrayal of previous actions and relationships adds to the narrative feel.
Engaging and interesting story: The story is widely described as very good, interesting, and compelling, with a solid foundation and a plot that becomes more dynamic as it unfolds. Reviewers find the premise engaging and the storytelling thrilling.
High replay value: Multiple reviewers mention that the game warrants a second playthrough for potential alternate routes, and that separate playthroughs revealed unexpected plot threads and new outcomes. Playing every path reveals many new outcomes.
Story confusing and overwhelming: The story can be confusing, with too much happening that causes players to get lost and restart. The beginning of the book is also confusing, making it hard to follow.
Forced story outcomes despite stats: Fighting an imposing general always fails regardless of combat stat because the story requires it, and important characters killed in the first game somehow survived, sometimes after being killed several times. This undermines player choices and immersion.
Poor dialogue and choice quality: Choices are often presented in one-liners that can be misconstrued or seen as moronic, with most dialogue options being moronic or idiotic, leaving only one making sense. This frustrates players and reduces meaningful decision-making.
Game too lenient and unchallenging: The game may be too lenient, with mild fails and a no-save mode that could have been more challenging. This reduces the sense of risk and accomplishment.
Disappointing first ending: The first ending is disappointing, and different builds lead to almost the exact same result, reducing replay value and player agency.
Choice-based narrative game: The game is primarily an interactive story where players make choices that lead to multiple paths and outcomes, with no going back. It is described as a choose-your-own-adventure game.
Save import from first game: Players can import their character and choices from the first game, allowing progress and decisions to carry over. This includes romances and other choices, enhancing continuity.
Direct narrative sequel: The game is a direct sequel that continues the story from the first game, serving as the second part of the series. The narrative picks up where the previous game left off.
Kill or spare choices: Players can choose to kill or spare characters, with a focus on these moral decisions. This is a key gameplay element.
One-liner dialogue options: Dialogue choices are presented as one-liners, which may affect how players perceive the depth of options. This presentation style is noted in the feedback.
Recommended for first-game fans: Multiple reviewers recommend this game to players who enjoyed the first Werewolves game or book, noting it as a worthy sequel. It is suggested to play or read the first part before starting the second for the best experience.
Great for reading enthusiasts: The game is highly recommended for those who love reading and interactive stories, as it offers a narrative-driven experience. Reviewers emphasize its appeal to readers and story lovers.
Strong sequel quality: Reviewers describe the game as a great sequel, with one noting it is even better than the first book. This indicates high quality and improvement over the predecessor.
Worth full price: One reviewer recommends the game at full price, indicating it provides sufficient value. This suggests the game is well-polished and content-rich.
Buy both parts together: A reviewer advises that if you haven't read the first part, you should buy both games. This suggests the story is continuous and best experienced from the beginning.
Series Veteran Narrative Enthusiast: Plays multiple times to see different endings, focuses on romance and story pacing. Motivation: Experiencing branching storylines and character development across multiple playthroughs. Stance: buy.
Non-Reader Visual Novel Convert: Plays through the story casually, not focused on mechanics. Motivation: Enjoying an engaging story without the feeling of reading. Stance: buy.
Comparable to beloved book series: The game is likened to picking up the second volume of a favorite book series, and to the first Werewolves game with more internal conflicts. Playing the first chapter is considered key to enjoying this sequel.
High replayability for endings: The game is replayable to see different endings, and this is a key feature for players. It adds significant value and encourages multiple playthroughs.
Sequel continues previous save: Players can carry over their save from the first game, which is appreciated for continuity. This feature enhances the experience of the second part in the series.
Preferred over similar games: Compared to Wayhaven Chronicles and Zombie Exodus, players prefer this game for specific reasons. It also outshines Twilight and Patricia Briggs' Mercy series due to player agency.
Story worthy of movie adaptation: The narrative is praised as deserving to become a movie, indicating high-quality storytelling. This suggests the plot is engaging and cinematic in scope.