
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
Excellent Tactical Combat: Players consistently praise the game's tactical turn-based combat, frequently comparing it favorably to XCOM. They highlight its engaging nature, strategic depth, and overall polish, often noting it as a strong entry or even superior alternative in the genre.
Balanced & Enjoyable Experience: The game offers a well-balanced and enjoyable experience, praised for its fair difficulty, engaging mechanics, and overall polish. Players found it to be a satisfying and worthwhile investment, often exceeding expectations for its price point.
Concise & Engaging Story: The game's story is generally well-received for being concise, engaging, and not overstaying its welcome. While often simple or predictable, its execution, pacing, and entertaining elements keep players invested without unnecessary fluff.
Strong Character Progression & Design: The character progression system is well-designed, offering meaningful upgrades and abilities without being overly complex. Players appreciate the unique skills and balanced design of each character, which encourages diverse playstyles and effective team synergies.
Unique Game Show Setting: The game's unique setting as a dystopian reality TV show, heavily inspired by 'The Running Man,' is a major highlight. This theme, complete with a reactive commentator, adds significant atmosphere, humor, and a fresh twist to the tactical genre.
Low Difficulty & Simplistic Combat: A significant number of players felt the game lacked sufficient challenge, even on higher difficulties. This was attributed to simplistic combat mechanics, predictable enemy AI, and a progression system that made characters too powerful too quickly, leading to an inverse difficulty curve.
Short, Repetitive, Low Replayability: Many players found the game to be too short, lacking in content, and offering low replayability. This often led to a feeling of repetitiveness and a lack of engagement, especially in the later stages or after the first playthrough.
Weak Story & Character Development: The game's story, characters, and world-building were widely criticized for being underdeveloped, predictable, and uninteresting. Players felt a lack of depth in character arcs and a forgettable narrative, which hindered immersion.
Lacks XCOM's Depth: Players frequently compared the game to XCOM, often finding it to be a less deep, less polished, and less tactically engaging experience. The game's strategic elements, customization, and overall challenge were seen as inferior to the XCOM series.
Technical Issues & Bugs: Players reported various technical issues including frequent crashes, freezing, performance dips, and minor animation/visual bugs. These issues negatively impacted the overall playability and immersion.
Mixed Combat and Exploration: The game features a core loop of turn-based tactical combat interspersed with real-time exploration segments. These exploration phases involve navigating environments, solving simple puzzles, disarming traps, and finding loot or optional encounters.
XCOM-like Tactical Combat: The combat system is heavily inspired by XCOM, featuring a two-action point system, cover mechanics, and overwatch. However, it's a more streamlined and linear experience, lacking the base-building, procedural generation, or deep customization of traditional XCOM titles.
Character Progression and Gear: Characters can be customized through skill trees, weapon choices, and equipable implants. As players level up, they gain skill points to unlock new abilities and enhance their characters.
Dystopian Reality Show Setting: The game is set in a dystopian, post-apocalyptic cyberpunk future, where the story revolves around a violent reality TV game show called 'Homicidal All-Stars.' This setting draws inspiration from films like 'The Running Man' and 'The Hunger Games.'
Simple and Accessible Gameplay: The game is generally considered simple and linear, with a gradual difficulty curve. While some early levels might pose a challenge, the overall gameplay is not overly difficult, especially for players familiar with similar genres.
Strong overall optimization: Many players praised the game's excellent optimization, reporting smooth performance and high, stable framerates even on older PCs or high resolutions with powerful hardware. This indicates a generally well-optimized game experience for a significant portion of the player base.
Minor technical issues reported: While many players reported a smooth experience, some encountered occasional freezes, minor crashes, or brief pauses. A critical bug involving negative generator HP was also reported, which could impact ironman saves. The frequent auto-save feature helps mitigate progress loss from crashes.
Good Steam Deck performance: The game generally performs well on the Steam Deck, with many users reporting a smooth experience. However, some players had mixed feelings, indicating that performance might not be consistently perfect for all Steam Deck users.
Includes DLSS and other options: The game includes modern graphical options such as DLSS, which can help improve performance and visual quality for players with compatible hardware. This is a positive feature for PC gamers.
Average system requirements: The game's system requirements are considered average, making it accessible to a wider range of hardware configurations. This contributes to its good overall performance on various setups.
Highly Recommended Game: The game is widely recommended by players, especially when purchased on sale. Many found it to be a fun and worthwhile experience for its price, offering a satisfying single playthrough.
Ideal for Turn-Based Fans: The game is particularly recommended for fans of turn-based tactics and strategy games, especially those who enjoy XCOM-like experiences. It's seen as a solid entry in the genre, suitable for both veterans and newcomers.
Sequel Highly Desired: Many players expressed a strong desire for a sequel or additional DLC, indicating satisfaction with the core game and a wish for more content, potentially with deeper customization or new features.
Play on Hard Difficulty: Experienced players of turn-based strategy games are advised to start directly on hard difficulty to ensure a challenging and engaging experience, as normal mode might be too easy.
Adjust Graphics Settings: One reviewer suggested turning off certain graphical settings like DLSS and ray tracing, implying potential performance or visual issues with these features enabled.
Strong demand for sequel: Many players expressed a strong desire for a sequel, indicating satisfaction with the current game and a wish for more content, depth, and continued character stories. This suggests the game left a positive impression and a hunger for future installments.
Good value and length: The game's length, typically around 20-30 hours, was considered ideal and offered good value for its price. Players appreciated that the game provided a satisfying experience without overstaying its welcome.
Strong, unique characters: The characters were consistently praised for being unique, well-developed, and feeling like they genuinely belonged in the game's world. This contributed significantly to the game's atmosphere and player enjoyment.
Evokes 80s action movies: Players frequently noted the game's strong resemblance to 80s action movies like 'The Running Man,' 'Robocop,' and 'Mad Max.' This B-movie aesthetic and campy tone were highlighted as a fun and enjoyable aspect of the game.
Engaging content and pacing: The game offers a good amount of content, with exploration and puzzles providing a welcome break from combat. Players found the overall experience satisfying and engaging throughout their playthroughs.