Players experience frustration primarily due to widespread performance issues, including FPS drops, crashes, and poor optimization, even on high-end hardware. Additionally, repetitive or tedious gameplay mechanicsāsuch as excessive grinding, resource management, and base rebuildingāalong with pervasive bugs, broken mechanics (e.g., water systems, AI), and unfair progression systems (e.g., pay-to-win, DLC-locked content) exacerbate the negative experience.
Disappointment stems from the game failing to meet expectations set by trailers, screenshots, or genre standards. Key causes include unfulfilled promises (e.g., missing bosses, lack of fast travel), poor value for money due to unfinished or unpolished content, and aggressive monetization (e.g., overpriced DLCs, content locked behind paywalls). Players also criticize developers for prioritizing new content over fixing critical bugs or optimizing performance.
Players feel satisfied with the gameās depth of content, particularly its survival and crafting mechanics, which offer rewarding progression and customization. The base gameās value, regular updates, and immersive elements (e.g., realistic physics, detailed tech trees) contribute to long-term engagement. Performance improvements and co-op experiences also enhance satisfaction, especially when the game runs smoothly on their hardware.
Excitement is driven by the gameās unique blend of survival mechanics, frequent content updates, and immersive world-building. Players highlight engaging features like animal taming, deep progression systems, and cooperative gameplay, which create a sense of discovery and long-term investment. The adrenaline of exploration, boss encounters, and overcoming harsh survival challenges also fuels this emotion.
Enjoyment arises from the gameās core survival loop, including crafting, building, and exploration, which many players find entertaining and well-designed. Cooperative gameplay, mission variety, and the satisfaction of overcoming challenges (e.g., completing tough missions, expanding bases) contribute to a positive experience. Despite technical flaws, the gameās immersive visuals and dynamic world interactions keep players engaged.
Verdict
Mixed
Summary
Positive 64% Ā· Negative 36%. Score: 36 / 100
Positives:
The game offers significant depth, long-term engagement, and a variety of activities such as missions, character upgrading, and exploration. Players highlight its addictive and immersive nature, with a strong sense of progression and discovery.
The game features a well-designed crafting system with a massive blueprint tree, flexible leveling, and rewarding progression. Players enjoy the blend of survival, crafting, and base-building mechanics, which cater to different playstyles.
The game excels in cooperative play, allowing players to split tasks, specialize in roles, and enjoy shared progression. Co-op enhances replayability and makes the experience more enjoyable than solo play for many players.
The game is praised as one of the best survival games, offering deep and immersive mechanics such as oxygen management, wildlife interactions, and realistic survival challenges. It stands out for its attention to detail and engaging gameplay loop.
The game is frequently praised for its affordability, especially during sales. Players highlight the extensive content, regular updates, and hundreds of hours of gameplay as providing excellent value.
Negatives:
The game suffers from widespread performance problems, including frequent FPS drops, crashes, excessive VRAM/RAM usage, and poor optimization even on high-end hardware. These issues persist despite patches and significantly hinder gameplay.
Players criticize the game's monetization strategy, with essential content locked behind expensive DLCs. The base game feels incomplete, and achievements or full progression often require additional purchases, leading to frustration.
The game is plagued by bugs, including items falling through the map, mission-critical failures, AI pathfinding issues, and crashes. These problems disrupt progression and immersion, making the experience frustrating and unreliable.
The crafting system is described as convoluted, resource-intensive, and unintuitive. High-tier items require excessive effort for minimal payoff, and the tech tree feels bloated with redundant or poorly balanced options.
Progression is criticized for being overly slow, repetitive, and unrewarding. Players face excessive grinding for resources, unclear paths, and bottlenecks, particularly in solo or mid-to-late gameplay, leading to monotony.
Gameplay:
The game offers a persistent open world with shared progression, exploration, and survival elements. Players enjoy the mix of mission-based and open-world modes, though some note the survival mechanics can feel heavy in single-player.
Crafting is a core mechanic, with tiered progression from simple to advanced items. Players highlight the grind-based system for resources like platinum and steel, as well as the need for blueprints and experience to unlock upgrades.
Dynamic weather, hostile fauna, and biome-specific hazards (e.g., deserts, Arctic) add depth to survival. Players must adapt gear and strategies to environmental threats like storms, animal attacks, and temperature management.
Missions vary in length, complexity, and objectives (e.g., extraction, boss fights), with time limits and rewards. Some players criticize unbalanced difficulty, but the variety keeps gameplay engaging.
The game supports solo and cooperative play (up to 8 players), with role specialization for builders, hunters, and miners. Players appreciate the shared objectives and challenges in co-op mode.
Performance:
The game suffers from widespread performance problems, including frequent FPS drops, stuttering, and crashes, even on high-end hardware. Issues are exacerbated during multiplayer hosting, large base builds, and specific in-game events like burning trees or combat.
Performance worsens during extended play sessions or with larger builds, often due to memory leaks, save data bloat, or inefficient resource management. This leads to lag, stuttering, and the need for frequent game/server restarts.
Players report frequent crashes, often tied to graphic memory shortages, DirectX11/DX12 compatibility issues, or extended play sessions. Crashes may result in lost progress and are a significant barrier to gameplay.
Hosting multiplayer sessions is particularly problematic, with FPS drops, rubberbanding, and server strain (high CPU usage) becoming unplayable as more players or entities are added. Dedicated servers help but are not a complete solution.
The game exhibits inefficient hardware utilization, with GPU spikes to 100% while CPU usage remains low, causing latency. Lighting and physics engines are particularly demanding, leading to performance bottlenecks.
Recommendations:
The game is highly recommended for players who enjoy survival, crafting, base-building, and exploration mechanics, often drawing comparisons to titles like ARK, Valheim, and Enshrouded. Its depth and progression systems make it a standout choice for enthusiasts of the genre.
The gameās grindy progression and difficulty are polarizingāpraised by players who enjoy hardcore survival challenges but criticized for frustration, slow solo progression, and lack of quality-of-life features. It appeals most to those willing to invest significant time.
The game is widely recommended at discounted prices, with many players advising against full-price purchases due to performance issues, grind, or incomplete content. Sales make it a more appealing option for budget-conscious players.
Multiplayer, especially cooperative play with friends, is frequently highlighted as a major strength, improving replayability and making survival challenges more enjoyable. Solo play is often discouraged due to pacing issues.
The base game offers substantial content, but expansions (e.g., Prospector Edition) are considered worthwhile additions for players seeking extra maps, mechanics, or replayability. Many suggest trying the base game first before investing in DLCs.
Miscellaneous:
A subset of players mentions personal circumstances, such as disabilities or limited income, affecting their experience. Others note the game is more enjoyable with friends or as a gift.
Some reviews include comparisons to other games (e.g., The Forest) or mention specific community needs (e.g., Ukrainian translation), which are less frequent and impactful.
Players feel the developer focuses too much on new features and DLCs rather than addressing existing bugs and gameplay issues, leading to frustration.
Features like terraforming and genetically modified animals are criticized for being underdeveloped or lacking depth, detracting from the overall experience.
Players highlight the availability of workshop items (e.g., Crimson Knife, Larkwell Compound Bow) that enhance gameplay, suggesting a strong modding community.