- Strong modding community enhances replayability significantly
- High replayability with addictive and deep strategy
- Accessible yet deep gameplay for all skill levels
- Poor AI design disrupts balanced difficulty levels
- Unbalanced civilizations and mechanics frustrate players
- Game-breaking technical issues persist post-launch updates
Emotions
Players report widespread technical issues, including crashes, server failures, and poor multiplayer support, which disrupt gameplay. The AI is frequently criticized for cheating, lagging, or behaving inconsistently, particularly on higher difficulty settings, while late-game management becomes overwhelming due to mechanics like unit stacking and slow turn times.
Players appreciate the game's strategic depth, replayability, and balanced mechanics, particularly in *Civilization V*, which allows for diverse victory conditions and long-term empire management. The turn-based system, mod support, and immersive gameplay loop (e.g., city-building, policy advancement) foster engagement and a sense of accomplishment.
Long-term players express fondness for the game's enduring appeal, often comparing it favorably to newer entries in the series. Personal memories, such as playing with friends or discovering the franchise in childhood, contribute to its sentimental value, alongside its reputation as a classic with polished mechanics.
Players feel let down by later installments (*Civilization VI* and *VII*), citing design choices like art style shifts, AI behavior, and mechanics that deviate from *Civ V*'s core strengths. Technical issues, lack of developer support, and perceived declines in depth or balance further fuel dissatisfaction, especially when compared to the series' earlier successes.
The game's relaxed yet strategic gameplay, intuitive mechanics, and opportunities for exploration and discovery create a consistently fun experience. Players highlight solo or multiplayer sessions, casual playthroughs, and the satisfaction of overcoming challenges as key sources of enjoyment.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 83% · Negative 17%. Score: 17 / 100
Positives:
- The game's longevity is attributed to its active modding community, with mods like Vox Populi significantly enhancing gameplay, AI, and replayability. Mods are frequently recommended for extended fun.
- Players consistently highlight the game's replayability due to random maps, varied civilizations, mods, and multiple victory paths. The 'one more turn' loop is frequently mentioned as a key factor in its addictive nature.
- The game is praised for its balance between accessibility for newcomers and depth for veterans. Its turn-based mechanics, hexagonal grid, and one-unit-per-tile rule add tactical depth without overwhelming players.
- Many reviewers prefer *Civilization V* over *Civ VI* and *Civ VII*, citing better mechanics, UI, art style, and balance. It is often considered the best or most refined installment in the series.
- Despite its age, the game's graphics, art style, and leader animations are praised for their realism, immersion, and timeless appeal, often outperforming later entries.
Negatives:
- AI is criticized for being illogical, overly aggressive, or reliant on cheating (e.g., resource bonuses) rather than strategic depth. Higher difficulties feel unfair and unsatisfying due to static, exploitative mechanics.
- Players strongly dislike the mechanical and stylistic changes in *Civilization VI* and *VII*, citing deviations from core gameplay, cartoonish art styles, and poorly received systems like 'Ages'. Many prefer *Civilization V* for its balance and depth.
- Certain civilizations (e.g., Babylon) are overpowered, while others feel generic. Mechanics like happiness and religion are poorly implemented, punishing expansion or lacking depth.
- Frequent crashes, launch failures, and unplayable states post-update dominate feedback. Issues persist despite troubleshooting, rendering the game inaccessible for many players.
- Multiplayer is plagued by crashes, desynchronization, and a lack of active players. Features like mods and scenarios are underdeveloped, and cheating further degrades the experience.
Gameplay:
- Diplomacy is a core feature, with interactions like alliances, betrayals, and city-state negotiations. Players highlight its depth and integration with victory conditions.
- Each civilization offers distinct abilities, units, and themes, while expansions and mods add historical periods and customization options for replayability.
- The game’s turn-based mechanics and 4X (explore, expand, exploit, exterminate) framework are praised for strategic depth, though turn duration can be a concern.
- City-building and expansion are central to gameplay, with players managing infrastructure, wonders, and growth from antiquity to modern eras.
- AI decision-making (e.g., war declarations, diplomacy) affects gameplay balance, with players noting inconsistencies and difficulty scaling issues.
Performance:
- Multiple users report the game failing to launch or hanging after updates, often requiring reinstallation or troubleshooting. Launcher issues are a recurring theme in these reports.
- Crashes occur during gameplay, particularly after patches or during specific in-game events (e.g., France's turn). Some crashes are linked to actions like moving or skipping combat.
- Users report graphical settings reverting to minimum, DirectX 11 launch problems, and resolution-related issues like black borders at 1440p or 4K. Full-screen functionality is also problematic.
- Players experience lag and desynchronization in online multiplayer, especially on large maps or during long sessions. This affects the overall multiplayer experience.
- The game runs smoothly on modern hardware (e.g., 4K 60fps) and supports features like AMD FSR and Nvidia DLSS for enhanced performance. It is also optimized for laptops due to low-poly rendering.
Recommendations:
- The game is highly recommended for players who enjoy deep strategy, long-term planning, and immersive gameplay, particularly fans of 4X and turn-based strategy games. Its replayability and emotional investment are frequently highlighted.
- Expansions like *Brave New World* and mods like Vox Populi are widely recommended to enhance the experience. Players advise buying DLCs in bundles during sales for the best value.
- Some players express reluctance to buy *Civilization 7* at full price, preferring to wait for a sale or stick with *Civ 5*.
- While some recommend it as a great introduction to the series, others suggest it may not be the best starting point in 2025 due to its age. The gradual learning curve makes it accessible for casual or semi-serious players.
- Despite its age and occasional crashes, the game is praised as a timeless masterpiece and a must-play for strategy fans, even a decade after release.
Miscellaneous:
- Players express discontent with perceived industry trends, such as aggressive DLC monetization and prioritizing profit over game quality. This reflects broader concerns about the franchise's direction.
- Multiple reviews mention issues with game localization, suggesting translation errors or inconsistencies that affect gameplay or immersion. This is a functional concern impacting accessibility.
- Reviews occasionally mention other 4X games as preferable alternatives to Civilization 7, signaling competition and potential dissatisfaction with the latest release.
- Some reviews include personal anecdotes and emotional connections to the Civilization series, indicating strong fan loyalty despite criticisms. This feedback is subjective but highlights player investment.
Similar games
Blend with other games
99%Sid Meier’s Civilization® VI
98%Sid Meier's Civilization® IV
98%Sid Meier's Civilization VII
97%HUMANKIND™
96%Millennia
96%Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition
96%Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition
96%Ara History Untold: Anniversary Edition
96%Old World
96%Age of Empires III: Definitive Edition
95%Through the Ages
95%Europa Universalis IV