Tannenberg Review Summary

Enjoyable historic and realistic gameplay is let down by a low player base forcing matches filled with unintelligent bots.

Game is fun and enjoyable: Players consistently describe the game as fun, entertaining, and enjoyable, often highlighting its appeal both solo and with friends. This feedback indicates a strong positive reception of the core gameplay.

Historic and realistic gameplay: Reviewers value the game's historical accuracy and realism, from its representation of World War 1 to its weaponry and uniforms. This authenticity is a major draw for players interested in the era.

Graphics receive mixed praise: Opinions on graphics vary, with some calling them beautiful or amazing while others find them just okay. Overall, the visuals are generally well-regarded, especially at maximum settings.

Best WW1 game available: Reviewers frequently compare the game favorably against other World War 1 titles, calling it the best or one of the best in the genre. The game is praised for its historical knowledge and tactical shooter elements.

Bots enhance gameplay experience: Players appreciate the presence of bots for casual play, noting they provide a fun and structured experience even without human players. Bots are seen as a positive feature that extends the game's longevity.

Low player base overall: Many reviews note a very small online player population, often with only a handful of real players on servers at any time. This results in sparse matches and a generally dead feel.

Matches filled with bots: Due to low player counts, many matches are filled with bots, sometimes up to 80% or more. Real players are often outnumbered, which diminishes the multiplayer experience.

Server population issues: Players report that servers are often empty or poorly populated, with some regional servers having no players at all. The EU server appears to have the most activity, but even that is limited.

Clunky animations and movement: Animations and player movement are described as clunky, stiff, and slow compared to other games. This makes the gameplay feel awkward and less fluid.

Enemies hard to spot: Players find it difficult to see enemies in bushes or across the map, leading to frustrating deaths. The camouflage and map design contribute to visibility issues.

WW1 FPS with realistic setting: The game is a WWI-set first-person shooter with a realistic historical approach, featuring period-appropriate classes and weapons. It is part of the WW1 Game Series and focuses on the Eastern Front.

Multiplayer with bot support: The game is primarily a multiplayer shooter that includes bot teammates and opponents, allowing for solo play or filling empty server slots. Bots help maintain match dynamics when player counts are low.

Bolt-action rifles one-shot kills: Weapons are predominantly bolt-action and breach-load rifles that often kill in one shot, along with pistols, revolvers, and melee weapons. This realistic damage model demands strategic thinking and precise aim.

Large maps and 64-player battles: The game supports up to 64 players on large, diverse maps that are spacious but not empty. This scale facilitates intense battles and strategic movement across the battlefield.

Gas attacks require masks: The game includes gas attacks that force players to wear gas masks, which restrict visibility. This mechanic adds a tactical layer to combat and is a notable historical element of WWI.

Optimization praised on low-end hardware: Multiple reviewers report smooth performance on low-end hardware, with one noting 100 FPS on ultra settings with an RTX 2060 and i7-7700K. This feedback indicates positive optimization and accessibility for a wide range of systems.

Optimization varies, sometimes poor: Some content lags and could be more optimized, with one reviewer noting poor optimization requiring lowered graphics for stable frame rates. Frame rate drops are common but not always game-breaking.

Hardware demanding at high settings: High graphics settings are demanding, consuming huge GPU performance and requiring strong CPUs. One reviewer notes the game may run at half the frame rate of Verdun on identical settings on some hardware.

Network errors cause crashes: Frequent crashes due to network errors, along with connection losses and timeouts, disrupt gameplay. Players report these issues as common, indicating a need for improved network stability.

Performance acceptable but improvable: Some reviewers find performance acceptable but believe it could be improved, while others note optimization has been improved through patches. Moderate FPS on low-end laptops remains fluid without hitches.

Recommended for WW1 enthusiasts: The game is repeatedly recommended to fans of World War I and historical shooters. Many reviewers highlight its historical accuracy and authentic atmosphere as key strengths.

Positive overall recommendation: A large number of reviews provide a straightforward positive recommendation, often without specific details. This suggests general satisfaction with the game.

Low player count problem: A recurring criticism is the lack of online players, leading to matches against bots or empty servers. Some reviewers find this unacceptable, while others tolerate it.

Buy on sale: Several reviewers advise purchasing the game during a Steam sale or discount. They feel the game offers better value when bought at a reduced price.

Alternative to Battlefield 1: The game is seen as a more realistic and historically accurate alternative to Battlefield 1. Reviewers appreciate it for players disappointed by BF1's arcade style.

Community fair range: $5.00 - $10.00.

Tannenberg offers an initially engaging historical WW1 multiplayer experience, but the novelty fades due to repetitive gameplay, limited content, and low player counts, leading to a drop in enjoyment over time.

Friction: Low player count; Repetitive gameplay; Limited content.

History Realism Devotee: Tactical, squad-based, methodical gameplay. Motivation: Historical authenticity and immersive WW1 atmosphere. Stance: buy.

Casual Action Seeker: Run-and-gun, capture points, quick respawn. Motivation: Fast-paced fun and large-scale multiplayer action. Stance: sale.

Disappointed Skeptic: N/A. Motivation: Frustration with low population, technical issues, and lack of depth. Stance: no buy.

Monetization: Reviews explicitly mention no microtransactions.

Compared to Verdun: The game is often compared to its predecessor Verdun, with players noting it features larger, more open maps and a different focus on maneuver warfare rather than trench combat. Some find Tannenberg more strategic and enjoyable, while others see it as a lighter alternative.

Compared to Battlefield 1: Players frequently compare Tannenberg to Battlefield 1, noting its superior historical accuracy and more realistic, deliberate gameplay. Many fans of historical shooters prefer Tannenberg's authenticity over Battlefield 1's arcade-style action.

Small player population: Many reviews highlight the game's small and often inactive online player base, which can lead to matches filled with bots. This is a major concern for players seeking competitive multiplayer experiences.

Bots fill matches: Due to low player counts, matches are often filled with bots to allow gameplay. While this enables matches, it reduces the competitive multiplayer experience.

Part of game series: The game is recognized as a standalone follow-up to Verdun and part of a series that also includes Isonzo. Players often discuss how these titles relate to each other and the series' overall direction.