MyDear.exe Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-11-04
  • Warm heartwarming love story
  • Puzzles integrated with narrative
  • Nostalgic retro OS interface
  • Low replay value overall
  • Minigames feel old-fashioned
  • Unclear password input hints
MyDear.exe header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

  • -

    No data available

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

A warm, heartwarming love story with narrative-integrated puzzles and a nostalgic retro OS interface, though low replay value, old-fashioned minigames, and unclear password hints hold it back.

What players like

Warm heartwarming love story: Many reviewers describe the story as warm, sweet, and heartwarming, focusing on a decades-long love between Ellie and Lucien. The emotional tone is consistently praised as touching and sincere.

Puzzles integrated with narrative: Reviewers frequently note that puzzles are tightly woven into the story, with solving them advancing the plot naturally. This integration is seen as a key strength of the game.

Nostalgic retro OS interface: The Windows 2000/XP-style desktop simulation evokes nostalgia and is praised for its detailed and realistic design. It enhances immersion and serves as more than just a visual gimmick.

Fun and clever minigames: The minigames are often described as simple yet varied and enjoyable, adding liveliness to the experience. They are seen as a fun way to interact with the story.

Cute and cozy art style: Many find the art style warm, cozy, and cute, with a distinctive hand-drawn feel. The overall atmosphere is soft and not scary.

Common complaints

Low replay value overall: The linear narrative and fixed puzzle answers remove motivation to play again after the first completion. Knowing the story and solutions eliminates the incentive to reopen the game.

Minigames feel old-fashioned: The built-in minigames are seen as dated and require high precision. One minesweeper minigame is described as eye-straining and distracting from the main story.

Unclear password input hints: Some passwords require slashes or spaces, but the game does not clearly indicate this at first. This causes confusion for players attempting to enter passwords.

Cat fighting stun penalty: In the cat fighting minigame, missing an enemy causes a brief stun. This adds a punishing mechanic to the minigame.

Voice acting disliked: At least one player was not a fan of the voice acting. This is a minor subjective critique of the audio performance.

Gameplay and performance

Folder-based puzzle solving: Players solve puzzles by searching through folders on a simulated computer desktop, comparing clues and decrypting files. This core loop is echoed across many clusters.

Built-in minigames enhance experience: The game includes various minigames, such as Minesweeper, a dog battle, photo developing, parkour, and cat fighting, which add liveliness and help tell the story.

Narrative-focused casual experience: The game is a short, story-driven experience that explores memories of a couple and their pets. It is casual and healing, suited to slow play.

Encrypted files and password puzzles: Players must find passwords by cross-referencing clues from different files and decrypting folders to progress and reveal the story.

Desktop simulation genre: The game simulates navigating a computer desktop with windows, files, and folders, similar to other desktop explorer games. This setting is central to the gameplay.

Recommendations

Warm, Relaxing Experience: Reviewers describe the game as relaxing and cozy, ideal for playing under a blanket with tea or finding sweetness in daily life. It is also recommended for those wanting a warm story without horror elements.

Strong Overall Recommendation: Multiple clusters express a clear positive recommendation, calling the game highly recommended and worth playing. Players consider it a safe purchase for fans of casual, story-driven games.

Good Indie Value: Reviewers view it as a solid indie title and a good value, especially at a discount price. This makes it a low-risk purchase for casual and story-focused players.

Buying context

Community fair range: $6.00 - $9.00.

Game completion: 3.0h.

Story completion: 2.0h.

Player profiles

Romance Anime Narrative Fan: Plays short narrative romance games, notices achievement completion, and focuses on emotional character moments. Motivation: To experience a heartfelt romance story with anime-style emotional beats and a devoted male lead. Stance: buy.

Cozy Relaxation Player: Short, relaxed sessions focused on comfort and easy progression. Motivation: To unwind with a gentle, warm story that feels comfortable and low-pressure. Stance: buy.

Indie Narrative Supporter: Seeks short indie narratives, considers price-to-length value, and plays for emotional resonance. Motivation: To support small studios making emotionally touching, story-driven games. Stance: sale.

Other review notes

Short game length: Many reviewers note the game is very short, often completable in a couple of hours. This is a common observation about its brevity.

Short playtime for price: Some players feel the short duration does not justify the full price, though others find it acceptable at a discount. Pricing concerns are tied to the game's length.

Small-scale production: The game is described as a small-scale indie work with reasonable pricing. Reviewers acknowledge its modest scope.

Similar to Desktop Explorer: Gameplay involves searching folders for passwords like in Desktop Explorer, but with a warmer and less horror-focused tone. Some also compare it to other clue-piecing games.

Casual and healing atmosphere: Unlike typical suspense or horror games, this one offers a casual and healing experience. The story lacks horror elements, focusing instead on warmth.