
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 78% · Negative 22%. Score: 22 / 100
Verdict
Predatory Monetization
Summary
The game has a history of predatory monetization practices, including pay-to-win mechanics, real-money gacha, and intentionally frustrating design to encourage spending. While some of these issues have been addressed in later updates, the initial presence of these elements has left a negative impression on players. Additionally, the game and its additional content are seen as overpriced, creating a fear of missing out for players who want the complete experience. Score: 85 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Mixed User Experience
Summary
The game has received mixed reviews regarding its mechanics, UI/UX, and navigation. While some users appreciate the detailed and user-friendly interface, others find the controls and UI to be poorly designed. The complex mechanics and difficult missions require additional practice or external research, which can be frustrating. Navigation and guidance also present a challenge for some users, particularly those unfamiliar with the series. Score: 50 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Playable with Notable Issues
Summary
The game generally performs well on the Steam Deck with good frame rates and visual settings. However, significant issues include the presence of Denuvo DRM, which causes technical barriers and frustrations. Control issues, particularly with keyboard and mouse setups, and frequent crashes also negatively impact the user experience. Text readability on the Steam Deck's screen is a mixed bag, with some users finding it too small while others report no issues. Score: 60 / 100
Top points
Positives:
Negatives:
Gameplay:
Performance:
Recommendations:
Miscellaneous: