LIZARDS MUST DIE 2 Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-08-30
  • Sequel surpasses original significantly
  • Highly engaging and enjoyable gameplay
  • Excellent graphics and animations
  • Combat is clunky and janky
  • Bugs and technical issues
  • Poor optimization and performance
LIZARDS MUST DIE 2 header

Emotions

Archetypes

Hardware

Windows <8GB VRAMpositive

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

A worthy sequel that surpasses the original with highly engaging gameplay and excellent visuals, but clunky combat, bugs, and poor optimization drag it down.

What players like

Sequel surpasses original significantly: Players overwhelmingly agree that this sequel improves on the first game in nearly every aspect, including graphics, gameplay, story, and overall quality. Many describe it as a worthy follow-up that is more dynamic, fun, and polished.

Highly engaging and enjoyable gameplay: Reviewers find the game very engaging, fun, and addictive, with a good vibe and lots of personality. The gameplay is described as genuinely good and hard to stop playing.

Excellent graphics and animations: The game's visuals are consistently praised as stunning, bright, and vivid, with top-tier animations and cutscenes. Graphics are considered a strong point of the experience.

Packed with memes and references: The game is described as a walking collection of memes, including references to Ssanych, Statham quotes, and other pop culture. This adds to its fun and humorous appeal.

Great co-op multiplayer experience: Playing with friends, especially in 4-player co-op, is highlighted as pure pleasure and epic chaos. Co-op is highly recommended and considered twice as fun as solo play.

Common complaints

Combat is clunky and janky: Multiple clusters report that combat feels clunky, slow, and rubbery, with unclear damage and unsatisfying hits. This is a widespread issue affecting the core gameplay experience.

Bugs and technical issues: The game is described as buggy, janky, and unpolished, with crashes and various technical problems. Some players find it unplayable, while others note it is playable despite bugs.

Co-op and multiplayer problems: Co-op and multiplayer features are heavily criticized, with issues like difficulty finding friends, terrible online functionality, and connection errors. Players feel the lack of proper multiplayer is a disgrace.

Poor AI voice acting: The Chinese voice acting is criticized for sounding like AI and lacking the charm of the original, with the neural network voice acting considered worse. This is a notable downgrade for players.

Game is short and brief: Players consistently note that the game can be completed in just a few hours, making it feel too short and lacking lasting content. This is a common complaint across multiple reviews.

Gameplay and performance

Co-op multiplayer supported: The game supports cooperative play for 1 to 4 players, allowing friends to join. It can be played solo or in co-op mode.

Lizard enemies combat: Players fight lizard enemies using melee weapons like clubs. The combat is central to the gameplay experience.

Multiple playable characters: The game features four playable characters, each with unique movesets and abilities. Some sources mention a fifth character.

Dinosaur mounts available: Players can ride dinosaurs as a means of transportation. This adds a unique traversal element to the game.

Combat-focused gameplay: The game offers a pure combat experience with chaotic and engaging mechanics. Combat is a core element.

Poor optimization reported: Multiple players report poor optimization, including needing high settings on top PCs and unoptimized processes. This is a common complaint affecting performance.

Frequent game crashes: Players experience frequent crashes, sometimes infinite, and disconnects. This severely impacts playability and is a high-priority issue.

Mixed performance experiences: Some players report smooth performance on max settings, while others have issues. This inconsistency may depend on hardware or patches.

Lag and performance drops: The game lags at start, periodically drops frames, and has general lag issues. This is common but somewhat vague, affecting overall experience.

Optimization causes lag on good PCs: Even on good PCs, poor optimization leads to lag, with high GPU usage despite low graphics. This suggests inefficient resource usage.

Recommendations

Play with friends for fun: Many reviewers emphasize that the game is best enjoyed with friends, whether in co-op or in a group, for laughter and fun. It is recommended to play with friends for an enjoyable experience.

Highly recommended overall: A significant number of reviewers strongly recommend the game, stating it is worth buying and playing. They express confidence in recommending it to others.

Buy on sale: Many reviewers advise purchasing the game when it is on sale, as it offers good value at a discounted price. They mention that the game is worth its price only when discounted.

Recommended to everyone: Several reviewers recommend the game to a broad audience, suggesting it is suitable for all players. They encourage everyone to try this excellent product.

Fun and relaxing: The game is recommended for those seeking fun and a break from daily routine. Reviewers mention it is great for having fun and laughing.

Buying context

Story completion: 3.0h.

The game has a slow first hour and a half, but becomes highly enjoyable, especially in co-op, according to most players.

Friction: unengaging first hour and a half; slow start.

Player profiles

Co-op Social Player: Plays in co-op groups, coordinates attacks, experiments with hero combinations, and values teamwork over solo play. Motivation: Social fun and coordinated multiplayer chaos. Stance: buy.

Absurd Humor Enthusiast: Plays to experience the game's jokes and chaotic moments, often in co-op but also solo, focusing on enjoying the weirdness. Motivation: Entertainment through absurdity, humor, and the game's unique personality. Stance: buy.

Russian Cultural Insider: Plays to enjoy the game's cultural jokes and references, likely in any mode but with a focus on understanding the context. Motivation: Cultural resonance and appreciation of Russian-specific humor and references. Stance: buy.

Platform notes

The Windows <8GB VRAM cohort reports smooth performance on max settings, with occasional crashes preventing rejoin of in-progress games.

Windows <8GB VRAM: positive. Runs smoothly on max settings, though occasional crashes prevent rejoining in-progress games.

Other review notes

Better than Smuta: Reviewers frequently compare the game to the Russian title 'Smuta', claiming this game is significantly better made and has features that Smuta lacks. It is praised as not being another Smuta, highlighting its superior quality.

Pyaterochka advertising integration: The game includes a collaboration with the Russian retail chain Pyaterochka, featuring an advertisement that is inserted openly and without a skip option. This includes a new outfit and achievements stylized with the number 5, which some reviewers find intrusive.

DLC adds new characters: The game is supported by DLC that includes additional content such as black skins and a red lizard hero. This DLC expands the game with new characters, enhancing replayability and player engagement.

Russian developer pride: The game is developed by Russian developers for Russian players, and reviewers express respect for the developers' work. This domestic production is seen as a point of pride and is praised for its quality.

Request for third part: Several reviewers express a desire for a third installment, hoping it will receive a higher development budget. They believe the game deserves a sequel, indicating strong positive reception and demand for more content.