
Verdict
Mixed
Summary
Positive 65% · Negative 35%. Score: 35 / 100
Verdict
Aggressive
Summary
The game has a mixed reception regarding its monetization. While some users recommend buying DLCs to enhance the experience and others perceive the game as a cash grab due to aggressive advertising, it is noted that the game does not have a pay-to-win model. The base game is enjoyable to some extent without DLCs, but additional purchases are suggested for a better experience. Score: 60 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Needs Improvement in Instructional Data
Summary
The analysis of user feedback reveals several key themes. The most prominent issue is the reliance on external data sources, particularly the game's wiki, for understanding lore and game mechanics. This suggests that the in-game resources are insufficient for players to fully grasp the game's complexities. Additionally, users report needing external tools like spreadsheets and second monitors to manage inventory and game data, indicating a lack of in-game support for these tasks. There are also mentions of technical issues, such as graphical problems when tabbing out of fullscreen mode. Score: 50 / 100
Top points
Verdict
Tinkering Required
Summary
The game initially faced compatibility issues with the Steam Deck, which were later resolved by a developer patch. Users have reported positive experiences with offline mode functionality and the user interface. However, the initial compatibility issue significantly impacted the user experience. Score: 40 / 100
Top points
Positives:
Negatives:
Gameplay:
Performance:
Recommendations:
Miscellaneous: