- Excellent card mechanics and strategic balance.
- High replayability offers fresh, unique experiences.
- Deep strategic gameplay requires careful planning.
- Highly addictive and very time-consuming gameplay.
- Unique classes enable diverse character builds.
- Lacking content and unappealing art style.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 97% · Negative 3%. Score: 3 / 100
Positives:
- The game features well-balanced card mechanics, offering strategic depth and engaging gameplay. Reviewers praise the numerical balance, diverse card options, and the blend of randomness and strategy. This balance contributes to the game's replayability and enjoyment for both casual and hardcore players.
- The game offers high replayability due to its diverse card options, random elements, and the ability to configure different card decks. Reviewers note that each playthrough feels fresh and presents new challenges. This contributes to the game's long-term appeal and encourages repeated engagement.
- The game emphasizes strategic decision-making, requiring players to exploit enemy weaknesses and plan card combinations. Reviewers appreciate the depth of strategy, the need for calculation, and the ability to test strategic thinking. The game rewards players who enjoy winning through brainpower and careful planning.
- Many reviewers found the game highly addictive and engaging, often losing track of time while playing. The game is praised for being a great time-killer and providing an immersive experience. This point reflects a strong positive sentiment towards the game's ability to captivate players.
- Each class in the game has unique and complete systems, offering countless possible builds. Reviewers find the class designs refreshing and appreciate the depth and variety they add to the gameplay experience. This encourages experimentation and customization.
Negatives:
- Reviewers feel the game is lacking in content and has an unappealing or average art style. Some find the initial impression unremarkable and are not drawn in by the game's visuals.
- Many players are encountering technical issues that prevent them from playing the game. These include getting stuck on loading screens, freezing after the tutorial, and crashing upon launch. Troubleshooting steps like reinstalling the game do not consistently resolve these problems.
- The game suffers from significant localization problems, particularly with the English translation. Players report instances of unfinished translations, dialogues remaining in Chinese, and text being cut off, making the game difficult or impossible to play in English.
- The game's monetization is perceived as aggressive, with players reporting that the game becomes unplayable without spending money after a certain point. Additionally, the game immediately prompts players to make a purchase after completing the tutorial.
- Progression is heavily tied to the campaign mode, as it's required to increase player level and health. This creates an unfair advantage for players who focus on competitive modes, as they will face opponents with higher health due to level advantages gained from campaign progression.
Gameplay:
- The reviews mention that every step is crucial, but without providing specific details. This point lacks specific details and actionable feedback.
Performance:
- -
No data available
Recommendations:
- Many reviewers recommend the game, emphasizing its overall quality and enjoyment. Some suggest it's worth the price, while others highlight its potential for future improvements through updates. However, some of these points are generic endorsements without specific details.
- The game is suitable for short, frequent play sessions, such as during work breaks. The focus is on earning rewards and battling other players in short bursts.
- One reviewer suggests purchasing the game when it's available at its lowest price. This implies that while the game is desirable, waiting for a sale might be a good strategy.
- One reviewer expresses strong preference for the game, stating they would choose it above all others if they could only keep one game. This is a strong endorsement, but lacks specific details.
- One reviewer gave the game a perfect score. This is a strong endorsement, but lacks specific details.
Miscellaneous:
- The reviewer expresses a growing appreciation for card games. This suggests a positive, evolving experience, but lacks specific details about the game itself.
