Enola Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-08-23
  • Deep and beautiful story
  • Low-quality visuals and assets
  • Immersive dark atmosphere
  • Confusing and unclear story
  • Multiple choices and endings
  • Bugs and instability issues
Enola header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

Immersive dark atmosphere and deep story with multiple choices, but confusing narrative, low-quality visuals, and bugs detract from the experience.

What players like

Deep and beautiful story: Multiple reviews consistently praise the game's narrative depth, character development, and meaningful plot. The story is considered a standout feature that elevates the overall experience.

Immersive and dark atmosphere: The environment is frequently described as impressive and well-crafted, with the dark and moody aura contributing significantly to player engagement. The atmosphere is considered one of the strongest aspects of the game.

Multiple choices and endings: Players value the multiple endings and the role of moral choices in shaping outcomes. The branching narrative encourages replayability and different interpretations.

Good voice acting and music: The voice acting is generally appreciated, particularly in later parts, and the horror-style music enhances the overall experience. The audio elements contribute positively to the game's mood.

Enjoyable and challenging puzzles: Puzzles are largely regarded as enjoyable and well-designed, providing appropriate challenges that engage players. The only caveat is that the factory sequence is often noted as an exception in quality.

Common complaints

Low-quality visuals and assets: Multiple clusters report that the game's graphics, assets, and overall visual presentation are poor, unpolished, and dated even for its age. The player feedback consistently describes the visuals as ugly, blurry, or pixelated, which undermines immersion and recognition.

Confusing and unclear story: The narrative is often described as muddled, nonsensical, and difficult to follow, especially toward the ending. Players find it hard to understand the plot, which reduces engagement and satisfaction with the overall experience.

Tedious and clunky gameplay: Many players find the gameplay slow, dull, and at times annoying, with some sections being notably tough. This makes the game less enjoyable and contributes to a sense of fatigue during play.

Bugs and instability issues: The game is reported as buggy, with items not being given correctly, some items vanishing from the inventory, and occasional crashes or glitches. These bugs detract from the gaming experience and require reloading saves.

Subpar voice acting and mismatches: Voice acting is criticized for being over-acted, scripted, or reading from a script, and there are frequent mismatches between subtitles and dialogue. This breaks immersion and bothers players.

Gameplay and performance

Survival horror experience: The game is characterized as a survival horror title, combining psychological and first-person horror elements. It is set in a nightmarish world with an atmospheric and immersive tone.

Multiple endings based on choices: Player decisions throughout the game significantly influence the story's outcome, leading to multiple endings. These choices often involve moral dilemmas, such as deciding to kill or spare characters.

Walking simulator with puzzles: The gameplay is largely a walking simulator, focusing on exploration and puzzle-solving rather than action. Players traverse environments and engage with puzzles to advance.

Moral choice system: The game presents players with moral choices in various scenarios, impacting the narrative direction and ending. These choices often involve decisions to kill or spare individuals, adding a layer of depth.

First-person perspective throughout: The game is played from a first-person perspective, with controls and movement suited to this viewpoint. This perspective enhances the psychological horror and immersive atmosphere.

Frequent bugs and crashes: The game suffers from frequent bugs and crashes that ruin the overall experience. Players report instability and game-breaking issues.

No 4K resolution support: The game lacks support for 4K resolution and is locked to 1600p. This limits visual quality for high-end displays.

Player gets physically stuck: Players can become physically stuck in the game environment, which halts progress. This is a specific and frustrating bug.

Keys not registering properly: There are glitches where key inputs are not registered correctly, affecting gameplay controls. This is a common and annoying issue.

Black screen at tower door: The game can freeze on a black screen at the tower door, preventing advancement. This is a specific and major bug.

Recommendations

Avoid buying game: Several reviewers explicitly advise against purchasing the game, with some even stating to avoid it on sale. Reasons include poor graphics, lack of enjoyment, and better alternatives available.

Recommended for horror fans: Multiple reviews recommend this game to fans of horror, psychological horror, and thriller genres. They highlight its appeal to players who enjoy dark stories and atmospheric adventures.

Not for survivors: Reviewers caution that the game contains triggering content related to sexual abuse and trauma, and specifically advise survivors to avoid it. They warn that content could be particularly upsetting.

Recommend for story: Several reviewers recommend the game for its narrative, describing it as a dark and interesting thriller that builds character atmosphere. They suggest it is worth playing for the story even if gameplay is not a focus.

Overall not recommended: Some reviews offer an overall not recommended judgment without specific details, reflecting a negative stance. Examples include 'cannot recommend', 'hard pass', and 'give pass'.

Buying context

Community fair range: $0.00 - $3.00.

Game completion: 6.0h.

Story completion: 6.0h.

Session length: 3.5h.

The game is met with mixed feedback: many players find it tedious and boring from the start, but some report that enjoyment arrives after understanding the plot or getting invested in the revenge concept.

Friction: tedious puzzles; repetitive gameplay; lack of direction; boring sections; annoying mechanics.

Unlock drivers: understanding the plot; getting hooked into the revenge concept.

Player profiles

Thematic Story Connoisseur: Explorative, attentive to environmental storytelling and text collection. Motivation: Engaging with deep, often dark narrative themes and psychological horror. Stance: buy.

Accessibility-Seeking Casual: Uses guides, needs clear visibility, prefers intuitive puzzles. Motivation: Enjoyable puzzles without excessive frustration; exploration with guidance. Stance: no buy.

Value-Conscious Critic: Comparative shopping, waits for sales, seeks alternatives. Motivation: Getting good value for money; avoiding overpaying for a flawed indie game. Stance: deep sale.

Other review notes

Multiple endings increase replay value: The game features six different endings, which players say adds replayability and provides a reason to play through multiple times.

Sensitive themes with warnings: The game includes disturbing content such as sexual abuse and rape, and it provides warnings to players who might be triggered by these themes. This is a significant consideration for potential players.

Indie psychological horror game: The game is an indie horror game that falls into psychological horror and walking simulator genres, drawing comparisons to titles like Silent Hill and Amnesia.

Gameplay duration around six hours: Players report the game takes roughly 5-7 hours to complete, which is shorter than average for the genre but still offers a decent experience.

Handles heavy and dark themes: The game addresses heavy topics such as trauma, abuse, and the consequences of violence, which gives it a dark and thought-provoking atmosphere.