
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
No data available
Review evidence
High-quality puzzle design: The game features a wide variety of well-designed puzzles that are thought-provoking, challenging, and satisfying to solve. The puzzles are integrated into the story and range from simple to complex, providing a fair rise in difficulty.
Beautiful art and visuals: The game is visually stunning with beautiful graphics, environments, and an aesthetically pleasing art style. Each level looks like a work of art, contributing to an immersive experience.
Engaging and thought-provoking story: The game offers an excellent and compelling storyline that is well-written and conveyed. The narrative is deep, engaging, and keeps players interested throughout the game.
Philosophical themes and reflections: The game is rich in philosophical themes that are thought-provoking and encourage players to question and search for truth. It addresses various themes and raises important philosophical questions.
Excellent gameplay and level design: The game offers brilliant and very good gameplay with excellent level design. It is enjoyable to play and provides a high gameplay value.
Puzzles have varying difficulty: The game features a wide range of puzzle difficulties, from easy to very difficult, with some requiring external guides or specific knowledge to solve. This inconsistency can lead to frustration and monotony.
Repetitive and tedious gameplay: The gameplay can become repetitive and monotonous quickly, with puzzles feeling like busy work and lacking variety, which reduces the overall enjoyment and replay value.
Poor translation quality: The game suffers from poor machine translation, particularly in languages like Simplified Chinese and Japanese, which detracts from the overall experience due to unclear and unedited text.
Stars are hard to find: Some stars in the game are difficult to find due to their hidden locations and the challenging puzzles required to obtain them, which can be frustrating for players.
Motion sickness issues: The game has significant motion sickness problems, especially during running and 3D effects, which can make it difficult for some players to enjoy the game comfortably.
Diverse puzzle-solving mechanics: The game features a wide range of puzzle-solving mechanics that require critical thinking and different perspectives. Players use various tools and gadgets to solve puzzles, which can be completed in any order and vary in difficulty.
Philosophical and existential themes: The game incorporates philosophical and existential themes into its narrative and gameplay. These themes are explored through storytelling, atmosphere, and environmental puzzles.
Story-driven gameplay: The game emphasizes storytelling and narrative structure, with a compelling story set in a destroyed world. The story is delivered through text logs, audio recordings, and computer terminals.
Similar to Portal with unique elements: The game is often compared to Portal due to its puzzle mechanics and first-person perspective. However, it distinguishes itself with different tools, a focus on existential questions, and a philosophical narrative.
Multiple endings and non-linear progression: The game offers multiple endings based on player choices and features a non-linear progression system. This encourages exploration and replayability.
Good performance and audio: The game is noted for its good performance, even on lower-end PCs, and has good audio quality.
Good graphics and optimization: The game is praised for its good graphics and optimization, with stable performance on modern hardware.
Crashing and bug issues: Several players reported occasional crashes and bugs, with some experiencing constant crashing and progress-resetting bugs.
Decent PC requirements: The game has decent PC requirements and can run smoothly on various hardware, including lower-end systems.
Runs well on specific hardware: The game runs great on specific hardware configurations, including Steam Deck, Macbook Pro, and certain Linux setups.
Ideal for puzzle enthusiasts: The game is highly recommended for those who enjoy puzzles, riddles, and thought-provoking challenges. It caters to both beginners and enthusiasts, offering engaging puzzles and interesting concepts.
Worth the purchase: The game is considered worth purchasing, even at full price. Some suggest it might be better to buy it on sale, but overall, it is seen as a valuable purchase.
Road to Gehenna DLC recommended: The Road to Gehenna DLC is highly recommended for players looking for additional content and depth.
Reawakened version suggested: The Reawakened version is suggested as a better way to experience the game for the first time, offering improvements and enhancements.
Try the demo: Players suggest trying the demo and the free mini-game Sigils of Elohim to get a feel for the game before purchasing.
Community fair range: $10.00 - $20.00.
Game completion: 37.0h.
Story completion: 20.0h.
The Talos Principle starts with easy and somewhat boring puzzles, but becomes more enjoyable as the difficulty gradually increases and players get accustomed to the game mechanics.
Reported time to anchor: 1h.
Friction: Easy and boring initial puzzles; Repetitive puzzles; Tedious and long puzzles.
Unlock drivers: Gradual learning curve; Introduction of new ideas in puzzles; Increasing difficulty.
Completionist Puzzle Master: Thorough and meticulous, aiming to solve all puzzles and uncover all secrets. Motivation: Mastering all puzzles and completing all content. Stance: buy.
Puzzle Enthusiast: Engages with the game for its puzzles and story, often comparing it to other favorite puzzle games. Motivation: Enjoying puzzle-solving and immersive narratives. Stance: buy.
Gameplay-Focused Solver: Focuses on solving puzzles and may skip or fast-forward through narrative elements. Motivation: Enjoying the puzzle-solving gameplay. Stance: sale.
Steam Deck: The analysis of user feedback for The Talos Principle reveals several key issues. Stability problems, including crashes and performance issues, were frequently reported, indicating a significant barrier to a seamless gaming experience. Control issues were also noted, with users needing to make adjustments for better gameplay. However, there were also positive reports of the game running well on the Steamdeck, suggesting that the game can perform well on certain platforms.
Linux and Proton: The Talos Principle generally runs well on Linux, with users expressing positive experiences and highlighting its compatibility. However, there are notable issues such as crashes in the native Linux build at specific points in the game and performance issues with the Vulkan API. These issues, while significant, do not overshadow the overall positive experience reported by users.
Monetization: The game is generally well-received for its content and value, with the base game considered worth its price. However, there are notable complaints about the need to purchase DLC to achieve 100% completion or obtain all achievements, which can be seen as a monetization strategy targeting completionists.
External guides: The analysis of user feedback reveals significant reliance on external data sources such as walkthroughs, guides, and Wikipedia to progress in the game. Key issues include the necessity of using external resources to complete quests, understand complex mechanics, and find hidden content. This dependency on external data disrupts the gaming experience and indicates areas where in-game information may be insufficient or unclear.