The Age of Decadence
Last updated: 2025-12-25
- High replayability with meaningful player choices
- Rich lore and brilliant writing enhance immersion
- Strategic turn-based combat with depth
- Unforgiving and frustrating combat mechanics
- Outdated graphics and technical issues present
- Punishing skill checks hinder progression
Emotions
Players experience frustration primarily due to the game's punishing difficulty, rigid mechanics, and technical issues. Key causes include unforgiving combat, arbitrary skill checks, and progression locks that force repeated restarts or reliance on guides. Bugs, softlocks, and outdated systems (e.g., clunky UI, poor camera controls) exacerbate the problem, while scarce resources and RNG-dependent fights add to the trial-and-error gameplay.
Satisfaction stems from the game's depth, replayability, and meaningful player agency. Players enjoy overcoming challenging combat, mastering strategic systems, and experiencing unique narrative outcomes based on their choices. The freedom to explore non-combat playstyles, impactful roleplaying, and the emotional reward of conquering difficult scenarios contribute to a rewarding experience.
Excitement is driven by the game's rich world-building, high replayability, and immersive mechanics. Players are engaged by the chaotic setting, tactical combat, and the ability to experiment with diverse character builds and playstyles. Discovering unexpected narrative twists, unique faction interactions, and the game's depth fuels enthusiasm for multiple playthroughs.
Disappointment arises from unmet expectations, particularly regarding shallow RPG systems, outdated design, and lack of polish. Players criticize the game for rigid skill dependencies, underdeveloped quests, and repetitive combat. Technical issues (e.g., bugs, crashes) and the absence of features like modding support or mature content further diminish the experience.
Players appreciate the game's rich storytelling, immersive world, and unique mechanics despite its flaws. The depth of lore, impactful choices, and the developer's dedication to creating a non-power-fantasy experience are frequently praised. The game's ability to evoke a Fallout-like atmosphere and its teleportation feature are also highlighted as standout elements.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 77% · Negative 23%. Score: 23 / 100
Positives:
- The game offers immense replayability due to branching storylines, faction-based paths, and meaningful player choices. Each playthrough feels distinct, with multiple endings, character builds, and non-combat options (e.g., pacifist or merchant playthroughs).
- The game features deep, well-written lore and world-building, often compared to classics like *Fallout* and *Dune*. Players praise its unique post-apocalyptic Roman-inspired setting, intricate factions, and puzzle-like storytelling that unfolds across playthroughs.
- The combat system is tactical, challenging, and rewarding, with mechanics like body-part targeting, consumable use, and weapon-specific animations. Players appreciate its depth and old-school CRPG feel, though it can be brutally difficult.
- The writing is frequently described as top-tier, with witty, immersive dialogue, morally gray characters, and a narrative that avoids clichés. Players highlight its depth, realism, and philosophical themes, often comparing it to literary works.
- Player decisions have irreversible, world-altering consequences, from faction alliances to quest outcomes. The game punishes reckless behavior and rewards role-playing, with no 'chosen one' trope or hand-holding.
Negatives:
- The combat system is widely criticized for being overly difficult, RNG-dependent, and poorly designed. Players report frequent deaths, reliance on save-scumming, and artificial difficulty spikes that make progression frustrating rather than rewarding.
- The game's visuals are described as dated, rough, and lacking polish, even for mid-2000s standards. Poor animations, weak engine performance, and graphical glitches further detract from immersion.
- Skill checks are rigid, arbitrary, and often gate critical content, forcing players to min-max or restart. Failed checks can lead to dead ends or softlocks, making progression feel unfair and poorly designed.
- The initial playthrough is often ruined by excessive difficulty, RNG, and lack of guidance, leading to disappointing endings. Players must restart multiple times or use guides to understand mechanics.
- The game's difficulty is artificially high, with only one setting that feels masochistic. Developers' dismissive attitude toward criticism exacerbates frustration, as the design prioritizes punishment over fun.
Gameplay:
- The game features a skill-based progression system where players allocate points to stats (e.g., Strength, Intelligence) and skills (e.g., persuasion, stealth) without traditional leveling. Choices are meaningful and often irreversible, shaping character specialization and playstyle.
- The game features numerous endings based on player choices, skill investments, and faction alliances. Replayability is high due to mutually exclusive paths and morally ambiguous outcomes.
- Dialogue and persuasion mechanics are central, with skill checks (e.g., Charisma, Persuasion) determining outcomes. Players can bypass combat entirely through dialogue, offering non-combat playstyles like diplomacy or deception.
- Eight distinct factions and professions (e.g., Assassin, Merchant) offer unique questlines, perspectives, and alliances. Faction choices significantly impact the narrative and available paths.
- Pacifist, merchant, and diplomatic playstyles are fully supported, allowing players to avoid combat entirely. Skills like persuasion and craftiness are as viable as combat-focused builds.
Performance:
- Players report frequent screen flickering and lighting issues, particularly on modern systems. Adjusting lighting settings to LOW or tweaking Lighting Quality often resolves these graphical glitches.
- Crashes are a common issue, occurring during gameplay, fights, or when accessing menus. Some players report no crashes, but the majority highlight this as a significant problem.
- A broad range of technical problems, including graphical glitches, keyboard/sound/resolution issues, and bugs requiring file integrity checks or language switches to resolve.
- Players experience excessively long loading screens, even when using SSDs. This issue is widely reported and impacts gameplay flow.
- Interface scaling problems are reported on 4K displays, making the game difficult to navigate or play at higher resolutions.
Recommendations:
- The game is widely recommended for fans of classic CRPGs, deep roleplaying, and narrative-driven experiences. Its strong writing, replayability, and consequence-heavy decisions make it a standout title in the genre.
- The game is not suitable for casual players due to its punishing difficulty, restrictive mechanics, and steep learning curve. It is best enjoyed by seasoned RPG veterans who appreciate complexity and challenge.
- The game demands patience, frequent saving, and a willingness to fail. Players are encouraged to stick with it despite initial difficulties, as the experience becomes rewarding over time.
- While the game is praised for its content, some reviewers recommend waiting for a discount due to its flaws or niche appeal. It is considered a great value at reduced prices.
- Many reviewers suggest trying the free demo to gauge whether the game's mechanics and difficulty align with personal preferences. This helps avoid frustration and ensures a better fit for potential buyers.
Miscellaneous:
- The game’s premise—playing as a character seeking wealth and power during political instability—is highlighted as fresh and compelling by players.
- Players appreciate the inclusion of an entire act in the demo, allowing for a comprehensive trial experience. This helps users make informed purchasing decisions.
- The comedy quips and puns in character sheets and descriptions clash with the game's dark theme, breaking immersion for some players.
- Personal experiences of playing the demo without purchasing suggest the demo is effective in attracting players and showcasing the game’s value.
- Players draw comparisons to *Pathfinder* and *Re:Zero*, suggesting the game appeals to fans of tactical RPGs and dark fantasy narratives.
Similar games
Blend with other games
98%Tyranny
97%Colony Ship: A Post-Earth Role Playing Game
97%Gothic 1
97%UnderRail
97%Avernum: Escape From the Pit
97%Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura
97%Tainted Grail: The Fall of Avalon
97%Wasteland Remastered
97%Swordhaven: Iron Conspiracy
97%Black Geyser: Couriers of Darkness
97%Pathfinder: Kingmaker — Enhanced Plus Edition
97%Divinity: Original Sin 2 - Definitive Edition