The Crust Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-04-18
  • Enjoyable and engaging gameplay experience overall.
  • Interesting storyline with depth and engagement.
  • Highly detailed graphics and atmospheric design.
  • Frequent bugs, crashes, and performance issues.
  • Slow research pace and unbalanced gameplay elements.
  • Tedious mechanics and poor UI/UX design.
The Crust header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Enjoyable and engaging gameplay: Players consistently describe the game as fun, engaging, and enjoyable. The gameplay mechanics are solid, and the decision-making process is particularly praised.

High potential and promise: The game is noted for its great potential and promise. Many players believe it has the potential to be one of the best in its genre due to its interesting concept and high replayability.

Interesting and engaging storyline: The storyline is frequently mentioned as interesting, beautiful, and well-written. Players enjoy the plot and find the story engaging and decent.

Highly detailed graphics and design: The game features highly detailed models and graphics. Players appreciate the detailed game design and the ambitious scope of the game.

Beautiful graphics and music: The graphics are often described as beautiful and decent. The music is also praised, contributing to the overall pleasant experience.

Common complaints

Frequent bugs and crashes: The game is reported to have numerous bugs, ranging from minor issues to game-breaking ones. Crashes are also frequent, occurring multiple times an hour and sometimes during saves.

Slow research and pace: Research times are reported to be slow and tedious, especially in the later stages of the game. The overall pace of the game is also considered slow, affecting development and production.

Conveyor belt issues: Conveyor belts are noted to be expensive and not functioning as expected. They cost money instead of resources and do not transfer the stated amount of resources, leading to frustration among players.

Colonist and drone AI issues: There are significant issues with the AI of colonists and drones. Colonists often do not follow settings and have problems with animations, while drones get stuck and ignore priorities.

Poor UI/UX design: The user interface and user experience design are criticized for being poorly made, inefficient, and inconsistent. This includes issues with the interface and overall design decisions.

Gameplay and performance

Resource management is central: The game heavily focuses on various aspects of resource management, including gathering, production, scarcity, and logistics. Players need to manage energy, raw materials, and supply chains efficiently.

Factory management mechanics: Players will engage in factory building, layout planning, and production management. This includes assembly line management and production optimization.

Technology and research development: The game features a science tree and technology development system. Players can research and upgrade various technologies to progress.

Moon base setting: The game is set on the moon, involving base development, mining, and colonization. The environment and setting play a significant role in the gameplay.

Colonist management and simulation: Players need to manage colonists and their needs, although they cannot be manually assigned to tasks. This adds a layer of colony simulation to the gameplay.

Poor optimization: The game is poorly optimized, leading to various performance issues. Some players report smooth performance on high-end hardware, while others experience problems even on powerful systems.

Frequent game crashes: The game experiences frequent crashes, including during saves and without apparent reason. Some players report crashes multiple times an hour, while others have not experienced any crashes.

Late-game performance issues: Players experience significant lag, frame drops, and performance issues in the late game. This includes low FPS and increasing lag as the game progresses.

Frame rate issues: Players report varying frame rates, including stable FPS and significant drops to low FPS. Some experience frame rates around 20 FPS, while others have stable performance.

Performance on specific hardware: Performance varies significantly depending on the hardware. Some players report better performance on Linux compared to Windows 11, while others experience issues even on high-end hardware.

Recommendations

Mixed recommendations on purchase: Players have varying opinions on whether to buy the game. Some recommend it despite bugs, while others do not recommend it at all.

Worth buying on sale: Many players suggest that the game is worth buying, especially when it is on sale.

Wait for sale or full release: Several reviews recommend waiting for a sale or until the game is out of early access before purchasing.

Highly recommended: Some players highly recommend the game, finding it easy to recommend to others.

Recommended for strategy lovers: Players who enjoy strategy games are likely to appreciate this game.

Buying context

Community fair range: $15.00 - $20.00.

Game completion: 70.0h.

Story completion: 50.0h.

Session length: 13.0h.

The game's onboarding experience is hindered by an insufficient tutorial, early game imbalances, and technical issues, but it becomes enjoyable once players overcome the initial learning curve.

Reported time to anchor: 2h.

Friction: Insufficient tutorial; Early game imbalance in trade and contracts system; Technical issues (low FPS); Mandatory and linear tutorial narrative; Abrupt difficulty spike after tutorial.

Player profiles

Automation Enthusiast: Focuses on building and optimizing industrial complexes, enjoys deep research and automation mechanics. Motivation: Enjoys the complexity and depth of building and automating factories. Stance: buy.

Narrative-Driven Manager: Balances base management with exploration and narrative progression, enjoys the thematic setting. Motivation: Enjoys the story and thematic elements combined with management simulation. Stance: buy.

Frustrated Tinkerer: Attempts to engage with the game's mechanics but is frequently interrupted by technical problems. Motivation: Wants to enjoy the game but is hindered by technical issues and bugs. Stance: no buy.

Platform notes

Steam Deck: The game has significant performance and stability issues on Steam Deck, with reports of low frame rates and frequent crashes. Compatibility with Linux via Proton is mixed, with some users experiencing issues while others find it seamless.

Linux and Proton: The game generally runs well on Linux via Proton with minimal issues. There was a minor widescreen issue reported, but it was resolved. Performance issues were mentioned but not specifically tied to Linux or Proton.

Extra review signals

External guides: The primary issues highlighted by users revolve around the lack of in-game documentation and the poor depth of tutorials. These shortcomings force users to rely on external resources to understand basic game mechanics and interactions, leading to a frustrating user experience.

Other review notes

Mention of Early Access: Players noted that the game is in Early Access, which may affect their experience and expectations.