Olija
Last updated: 2026-01-01
- Fluid and satisfying combat mechanics
- Engaging puzzles and platforming elements
- Unique and memorable boss fights
- Moody and impactful storytelling experience
- Underutilized mechanics and content
- Short playtime with rushed story progression
Emotions
Players frequently cite the game's short length, lack of depth in mechanics, and underdeveloped story as primary causes of disappointment. Many also feel misled by marketing, as promised features (e.g., trailer animations) were absent, and the game felt unfinished or rushed, particularly in progression, boss battles, and exploration.
The game's fluid and impactful combat, engaging exploration mechanics (e.g., harpoon system), and cohesive design are key sources of satisfaction. Players also appreciate the polished controls, balanced difficulty, and well-crafted audiovisual experience, which collectively deliver a rewarding and addictive gameplay loop.
Technical issues (e.g., crashes, loading times) and design flaws (e.g., stiff combat, unclear level design) frustrate players. Specific pain points include permanently missable collectibles, slow pacing, and difficulty spikes, particularly with the final boss, which disrupt the gameplay flow.
Players enjoy the game's dynamic combat, satisfying exploration, and immersive atmosphere. The combination of fluid mechanics (e.g., harpoon traversal), engaging world design, and strong audiovisual presentation creates a consistently fun and rewarding experience.
The game excites players with its innovative harpoon mechanics, fast-paced combat, and immersive exploration. Unique features like the hat system, brutal animations, and constant surprises (e.g., new discoveries) elevate the experience beyond expectations.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 87% · Negative 13%. Score: 13 / 100
Positives:
- Combat is praised for its responsiveness, variety, and satisfying feedback. Players enjoy the combo system, weapon-swapping, and punchy animations, which contribute to an addictive and well-balanced experience.
- Puzzles are well-integrated with the harpoon mechanics and platforming, offering a balanced challenge. Players appreciate the creativity and organic design, which enhances exploration and problem-solving.
- The harpoon is central to combat, puzzles, and traversal, creating a dynamic and engaging system. Players highlight its versatility, including teleportation, grappling, and mid-air mechanics, which add depth to both action and exploration.
- Boss battles are praised for their creativity, visual flair, and distinct challenges. Players highlight the imaginative designs and satisfying combat encounters.
- The game respects player time with a short, well-balanced runtime and smooth pacing. Players enjoy the lack of artificial time-stretching and the accessibility for casual gamers.
Negatives:
- Abilities, weapons, and hats are often deemed useless or underutilized due to the game’s short length and lack of complexity. This extends to missed opportunities for deeper gameplay and lore.
- The game’s length is a major point of frustration, with many completing it in 4-7 hours. This brevity leads to a rushed narrative, underdeveloped characters, and an unsatisfying ending, limiting replayability and emotional impact.
- The game’s progression is overly linear, lacking interconnected maps or incentives to revisit areas. Limited enemy variety and weak platforming elements further reduce exploration and depth.
- Frequent and lengthy loading screens, unskippable transitions, and slow sequences disrupt gameplay flow, wasting time and frustrating players, especially given the game’s short length.
- The auto-delete of save files upon completion and lack of cloud/local saves force players to restart from scratch. Collectibles are lost permanently if not completed in one playthrough, reducing replay value.
Gameplay:
- The game is primarily a 2D side-scrolling action-platformer with a focus on combat, platforming, and light exploration. Players note its linear yet engaging structure, often comparing it to Metroidvania-lite experiences.
- The game features a linear progression with optional secrets, hidden paths, and minimal backtracking. Players enjoy the balance between guided narrative and exploration for rewards.
- Hats serve as a progression system, granting passive buffs or altering combat styles. Players appreciate the customization and strategic depth added by unlocking or crafting different hats.
- Puzzles are integrated with combat tools (e.g., harpoon teleportation, traversal mechanics) and environmental interactions. Players highlight their role in breaking up action sequences.
- A village hub expands as players progress, offering NPC interactions, crafting, and upgrades. Players enjoy the sense of growth and community tied to exploration.
Performance:
- Multiple reports of crashes during gameplay, particularly when transitioning between levels or after repeated attempts. Some crashes are implied without specific triggers, indicating instability in core systems.
- Reports include startup failures (e.g., Russian feedback on launch problems) and periodic freezes during gameplay. Some players note resilience in certain conditions, but instability remains a widespread concern.
- Players encounter black screens that prevent progression, with some attributing the issue to HDD storage. This bug severely disrupts gameplay and may require hardware-specific fixes.
- Technical issues emerge in later stages of gameplay, alongside problems in debug modes. These may indicate rushed development or insufficient QA for edge cases.
- The game’s minimal hardware demands are noted, but this advantage is undermined by performance issues even on SSDs, highlighting optimization gaps.
Recommendations:
- The game is highly recommended for fans of indie titles, pixel art, retro aesthetics, and 2D platformers. It is often described as a polished, small-scale experience with a unique visual and auditory style.
- The game is frequently praised for its atmospheric, story-driven experience, making it ideal for players who prioritize narrative and aesthetics over combat or exploration depth. It is often compared favorably to other indie games with unique visual styles and melancholic tones.
- Many reviewers suggest buying the game only during discounts, bundles, or sales due to its short duration or niche appeal. The demo is also recommended as a trial before purchasing.
- The game is often described as concise and ideal for a single playthrough, offering a coherent and immersive experience. However, its brevity is a common reason for recommending it only at a discounted price.
- Players seeking challenging platformers like *Celeste* or deep combat mechanics may find the game lacking. It is better suited for casual gamers or those who prefer a relaxed, story-focused experience.
Miscellaneous:
- The game is commended for running smoothly on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a broader audience. This is a key advantage for players with limited hardware.
- Players critique the character design and cultural representation, suggesting it may lack authenticity or sensitivity. This feedback highlights a need for better inclusivity and research in character development.
- Players appreciate the game’s muted color palette, which enhances its atmospheric and immersive qualities. This design choice contributes to the game’s unique visual identity.
- The trailer’s art style receives positive feedback, indicating strong visual appeal and effective marketing. This suggests the game’s aesthetic resonates well with its target audience.
- The game’s vibe is compared to titles like *The Eternal Castle* and *Hyperlight Drifter*, indicating a nostalgic yet fresh aesthetic. This appeals to fans of retro-inspired indie games.
