
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
Highly enjoyable and addictive gameplay: Players overwhelmingly find the game highly enjoyable, addictive, and engaging, praising its unique mechanics, replayability, and overall polished experience. Many consider it a standout in its genre, offering significant value for its price.
Innovative genre fusion: The game is lauded for its innovative and successful fusion of genres, particularly combining Slay the Spire-like deck-building with autobattler mechanics. This unique blend creates a fresh and engaging experience that sets it apart from similar titles.
Deep hero and build customization: The custom hero and deck features are a major highlight, allowing players extensive customization and the creation of incredibly powerful, often 'broken' builds and synergies. This deep customization significantly enhances replayability and strategic depth.
Extensive card and unit variety: The game offers a vast and varied selection of cards, units, artifacts, and skills, leading to numerous powerful and often overpowered combinations. This extensive content contributes to diverse gameplay and high replayability.
Diverse strategies and boss encounters: The game offers multiple viable strategies and build paths to defeat bosses, providing flexibility and ensuring that players can progress even with diverse approaches. Bosses themselves have unique skillsets, adding to strategic depth.
Poor Game Balance: The game suffers from significant balance issues across cards, units, and builds. Many cards are useless, certain combinations are overpowered, and the reliance on RNG makes strategic planning difficult, leading to a lack of viable build diversity.
Unpolished, Lacks Content: Many players feel the game is unpolished, lacks content, and suffers from poor execution of its core ideas. It feels more like an Early Access title than a full release, leading to a repetitive and unengaging experience.
Flawed Genre Combination: The combination of deckbuilding and autobattler elements is poorly executed, with neither genre feeling fully realized. The autobattler aspect is often described as bland or a 'cutscene,' failing to add tactical depth.
Problematic Custom Heroes: The custom hero system is problematic. It requires significant grinding to unlock, offers limited customization, and often results in weaker or less interesting builds compared to default heroes, making it feel unrewarding.
Excessive Grinding: Players report excessive grinding required to unlock new content and progress. This, combined with a steep or uneven difficulty curve, detracts from the overall enjoyment and pacing of the game.
Hybrid Roguelike Auto-Battler: The game is a unique blend of roguelike deck-building, heavily inspired by Slay the Spire, and auto-battler mechanics. Players manage cards and units in a pseudo-turn-based combat system where units fight automatically, but players can pause to play cards and influence the battle.
Deep Custom Character System: A standout feature is the robust custom character system, allowing players to create unique heroes with personalized skills, factions, stats, and starting cards. This system provides significant build variety and replayability, with new options unlocking through progression.
Dynamic Card-Driven Combat: Combat is a real-time, pseudo-turn-based system where players play cards from their hand every 7 seconds to affect the battle. While units auto-attack, players can strategically use cards for buffs, debuffs, damage, or even unit movement, with limited manual control options.
Engaging Progression & Replayability: The game offers a well-balanced learning curve and strong progression, providing ample strategic choices and a satisfying challenge. Each run feels distinct and substantial, encouraging replayability and exploration of different playstyles.
Strategic Unit Management: Units automatically fight and use skills when their mana fills, but players can recruit, upgrade, and strategically position them before combat. Units have unique abilities and can be upgraded along different paths, similar to Monster Train, allowing for deep team building and synergy.
Poor performance and bugs: Players report significant performance issues, including low FPS and general bugginess, especially when many objects are present. This suggests a need for optimization.
Limited graphic options: The game offers only basic graphical settings, which might limit player control over performance and visual fidelity.
Highly Recommended for Genre Fans: Many players highly recommend the game, especially to fans of roguelike deck-builders and autobattlers. They find it enjoyable, challenging, and a good value, particularly when on sale. The game is seen as a fresh take on the genre.
Desire for Future Content: Players are eager for more content, including new heroes, units, cards, and balance adjustments. There's a strong desire for continued development and updates, with many believing the game has significant potential to grow and improve over time.
Wait for Sale: While many find the game worth its price, some specifically recommend waiting for a sale, implying that the current full price might be a barrier for some, or that the game offers better value during promotional periods.
Lacks High Difficulty: Some players feel the game may not be challenging enough for those seeking advanced, high-difficulty experiences. This suggests a potential area for developers to consider adding more challenging modes or content.
Prefers Other Autobattlers: One player indicated they would prefer to play Teamfight Tactics (TFT) instead. This suggests a preference for other autobattler games, possibly due to perceived differences in gameplay or depth.
Solid, Polished, and Playable: The game is generally considered playable and polished, with clean graphics and UI. While some aspects like optimization and updates received lower ratings, there's an overall sentiment that the game is decent, especially considering its Early Access status and potential for future improvements.
Inconsistent Theme and Immersion: Players feel the game's theme is underdeveloped and not taken seriously enough, leading to a lack of immersion. Randomly inserted jokes are cited as a specific example of this issue.
Unique and Vibrant Art Style: The game features a unique, vibrant, and meticulously crafted art style with a bold and harmonious color palette. However, one reviewer noted its appearance as 'common,' suggesting a mixed perception.
Excellent Steam Deck Performance: The game performs flawlessly on the Steam Deck, offering seamless cross-platform play between PC and the handheld device.
Exceptional and Engaging Soundtrack: The game's soundtrack is highly praised for being extraordinary and perfectly enhancing the gameplay experience by building tension and excitement.