- Unique VHS aesthetic and enjoyable gameplay experience.
- Great value for price and multiple endings.
- Genuine effort in acting and intriguing story.
- Poor acting quality and execution of QTEs.
- Plot and technical flaws present.
- Lack of realism, depth, and gameplay value.
Emotions
Archetypes
Timed cohorts
Switch between playtime slices of churn risk.
Refund churn
Risk snapshot
Fast read on churn risk and the loudest complaints.
77.5% PrecisionMar 30, 2017 → Feb 7, 2026
Total revenue at risk
$1,391
~$13 per month
Modeled from refund-intent reviews
Most dangerous issue
No Story
Design · 11.8% of risk
Churn driver breakdown
Weighted by churn risk
Design
Technical
73.7%$1,025
26.3%$365
Issue map
Complaint treemap
Normalized churn drivers sized by volume; click to inspect a cluster.
Issue treemap
Size = count · Color = sentiment
Design · 76.5% share
Technical · 23.5% share
Issue · Design
Unclear QTE Indicators
Share of issues
11.8%
Primary region
Czech Republic
Detected from language cues
Anger level
Furious
Average sentiment intensity