Anymaker Review Summary
Last updated: 2026-09-19
- Strong vehicle building system
- Great visuals and performance
- Zombie hordes and combat
- Game is rough and unpolished
- Tutorial is broken or unhelpful
- Needs more development
Emotions
Archetypes
Hardware
Windows <8GB VRAMpositiveWindows 12-15GB VRAMnegative
- Sample precision
- Helpful reviews
- 84%
- Unhelpful reviews
- 16%
- Protest reviews
- 0%
- 33%Helpful reviews with positive sentiment
- 67%Helpful reviews with negative sentiment
- Positive points
- 101
- Negative points
- 324
- Gameplay points
- 224
- Perf. points
- 19
- Rec. points
- 65
- Misc points
- 105
| Point | Description | Importance |
|---|---|---|
High Potential and Hype
| Many reviewers see great potential and have high hopes for the game. They are excited for future development and believe it could become something amazing. | 39% |
Strong Vehicle Building System
| Players consistently praise the vehicle building mechanics as well-done, interesting, and detailed. Many highlight the extensive part selection and in-depth engineering options. | 38% |
Great Visuals and Performance
| The game runs and looks fantastic, with smooth performance even on ultra settings and lower-end specs. Graphics and sounds are well-received. | 32% |
Zombie Hordes and Combat
| Zombies spawn hordes from gunshots and can knock you down, creating tense encounters. Dynamic combat and looting from enemies are highlights. | 29% |
Highly Enjoyable and Addictive
| Reviewers express strong love for the game, calling it amazing and fun. Many are eager to continue playing and see more content. | 26% |
Solid Foundation and Concept
| Reviewers find the game solid and the concept cool and legitimate. It has good bones with physics and serves as a good foundation for a physics sandbox. | 24% |
Worthy Successor to Stormworks
| The game is considered a big step forward from Stormworks in build quality, replayability, and overall design. It improves on many aspects while retaining the core appeal. | 21% |
Immersive Zombie Apocalypse World
| The world nails the zombie apocalypse feeling with a day/night cycle and long nights. Distant gunshots and mysterious elements add to immersion. | 21% |
Open World Sandbox Freedom
| The open world sandbox allows for detailed building and exploration. Players appreciate the freedom to go anywhere and the endless possibilities. | 19% |
Stable Multiplayer Experience
| Multiplayer is reported as stable and peak, without major issues seen in Stormworks. Building together on a single vehicle is a significant improvement. | 16% |
Manual Engine Building Appreciated
| Manual engine building and piping are seen as a huge step in the right direction. The scripting system and pseudo-grid based building add depth. | 12% |
Fun but Complex Building
| Vehicle building is described as difficult but fun, and complex yet great. The challenge adds to the enjoyment for many players. | 9% |
Worth the Price and Support
| Reviewers believe the game is worth the price and worth supporting in early access. Many would buy again. | 9% |
Enjoyable Survival Game
| The game is a very nice survival game with quality gameplay. It is interesting for being this early in development. | 9% |
Physics Sandbox Commendable
| The sandbox system and physics are commendable, providing a solid foundation for creative building and experimentation. | 5% |
Extensive Game with Depth
| The game is very extensive, blending open-world survival, vehicle building, and base building. The possibilities with current features are endless. | 5% |
No ECU Programming Needed
| Players appreciate that they do not need to program their own ECU and transmission, simplifying the building process. | 5% |
Good UI and Controls
| The UI is good in terms of operation, and the building system is interesting. Movement is marginally better than Stormworks. | 5% |
Developer Team Competent
| The Geometa team knows what they are doing, and the game will find its footing in the future. | 5% |