Players found satisfaction in the game's good value, responsive tools, and pleasing aesthetics, which contributed to an addictive and meditative experience. The game delivered on its promises with rewarding gameplay, effective upgrades, and thoughtful design elements like sound, all within a cozy, simple, and bug-free environment.
This emotion stemmed from the game failing to meet expectations, often compared unfavorably to similar titles like Powerwash Simulator. Causes included the game's short length, limited upgrade options, and high price relative to content. Players also felt disappointed by unaddressed critical issues, a lack of quality assurance, and the full game not living up to the positive demo experience.
Players experienced frustration due to numerous technical issues, including game crashes, freezes, and horrendous optimization leading to significant frame rate drops. Poor UI, clunky equipment selection, ineffective blower mechanics, and repetitive side quests also contributed, alongside audio bugs and an overall unfinished feel.
Enjoyment was largely driven by the game's chill, cozy aesthetic with gorgeous visuals and calming music, creating a positive and fun atmosphere. Players appreciated the relaxing nature of the gameplay, good physics, and its ability to provide significant fun and positive vibes, especially after a tiring day.
The game's overall calming nature, soothing graphics, and relaxing music fostered a strong sense of relaxation. Many found it an ideal way to unwind, turn off their brain after a long day, or de-stress, particularly after playing high-action games or before sleep.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 75% · Negative 25%. Score: 25 / 100
Positives:
Players consistently praise the game as a deeply relaxing, cozy, and meditative experience, perfect for de-stressing after a long day. The core gameplay loop, including the act of cleaning, is described as extremely satisfying and enjoyable.
The game offers substantial content, including a variety of maps, 'leaves' (items to clean), and distinct tasks or puzzles within levels, keeping the experience fresh. The upgrade system feels worthwhile, and the pursuit of upgrades or better times makes the game increasingly addictive.
Players are highly impressed by the game's quality, especially given it was developed by a small team of two. The developers are praised for being responsive and very active in their Discord community, consistently fixing bugs and engaging with players, which includes adding many nice little details.
The fundamental process of clearing and perfecting areas, such as blowing coconuts or leaves, is found rewarding. Players appreciate the responsiveness and variety of tools available, noting that each offers distinct capabilities and makes the gameplay fun.
Players enjoy the game's specific thematic content, such as the Halloween updates, which can be humorous or even slightly spooky. Unexpected side mission collaborations and unique level elements like a shopping mall add pleasant surprises and variety.
Negatives:
Players consistently report severe performance issues, including low frame rates, unresponsiveness, and frequent crashes, even on low settings. The game feels poorly optimized, contributing to an 'Early Access' quality, physical strain, and motion sickness due to forced frame generation. Crucial settings like disabling FSR are also missing.
The core gameplay loop quickly becomes tedious and repetitive, leading to player fatigue within a few hours. The game is perceived as short, with small levels and side quests that lack variety and offer minimal rewards, contributing to an overall feeling of disappointment and a lack of engaging content.
The game is riddled with various bugs, ranging from UI issues, freezing menus, and audio glitches (e.g., sound at 0% volume, incorrect audio channels) to graphical problems like unrendered interiors and object clipping. Players also report broken quest objectives and unlocalized hints.
The user interface and overall experience are cumbersome, featuring tedious navigation for upgrades involving multiple loading screens. Key interactions like holding 'E' for everything and a poorly designed equipment wheel hinder usability. Basic settings, such as a master volume control, are absent, and unskippable screens add to player frustration.
The game's progression system is seen as lacking depth, requiring excessive grinding for unlocks while offering few truly impactful upgrades. Many upgrades are considered superficial (e.g., visual changes, battery life), character customization options feel underutilized, and skills have minimal gameplay impact.
Gameplay:
Players highlighted that the game expands beyond simple leaf blowing, including diverse debris like Scrabble pieces and coconuts, and tasks like burning weeds, cutting logs, and chasing crows. This variety adds depth and keeps the gameplay engaging beyond the initial concept.
Reviewers noted that the main story can be finished in approximately 3 hours, with 100% completion achievable within two days. This suggests that the game's overall content might be limited for some players, leading to a quick overall experience.
The core gameplay loop of blowing mess, earning cash, and upgrading gear was found satisfying by players. Many experienced a strong urge to complete tasks and meticulously clean areas, similar to the appeal of tidying up in real life.
Players found themselves favoring tools like the Shredder and Vacuum Cleaner over the initial leaf blower, especially after unlocking them. The Shredder became essential for most tasks, and the vacuum for specific collection, indicating a shift in optimal gameplay strategy.
After cleaning an area like a playground, players observed that garbage reappeared at a new level. This mechanic could either provide continuous content or potentially frustrate players seeking permanent cleanliness in a completed area.
Performance:
Players generally report good performance, with one user achieving stable high FPS on max settings, experiencing drops only in specific, demanding scenarios like massive leaf piles. Another player noted no performance issues on a gaming laptop.
The game offers numerous graphics settings that players can adjust for optimization. However, one reviewer mentioned that changing these settings had little impact on their frame rate, indicating potential optimization quirks on some systems.
Players highlighted that the game's loading times are notably prolonged, which negatively impacts the gameplay flow. This issue is particularly frustrating considering the amount of content typically loaded.
Recommendations:
Many players enthusiastically recommend the game, with several stating they would tell others to play it or suggesting trying the demo. This indicates strong overall satisfaction and a positive player experience.
Players believe the current game price (e.g., 15-20€) is too high for its present state, recommending purchase only at a significant discount (under 10€) or once critical issues are resolved. Additionally, there are warnings about potential performance problems on laptops or weaker PCs.
The game strongly appeals to players who enjoy focused and satisfying 'chore-sims,' drawing comparisons to titles like Powerwash Simulator. This suggests a specific niche audience that finds the gameplay enjoyable and rewarding.
Reviewers recommend joining the game's Discord server for assistance if any problems arise. This indicates an active community or developer presence providing support and a channel for player engagement.
Miscellaneous:
Players have pointed out the current absence of Japanese language support as of November 2025. While this is a specific feature request, some feedback suggests that the game's limited story focus lessens the impact of this omission for some players.
An observation was made that additional missions become available later in the game's progression. This suggests a structured content rollout where new activities are introduced over time rather than being immediately accessible.
Feedback regarding future updates was extremely vague, stating they 'would be a class in general.' This phrase lacks specific meaning, making it difficult to extract actionable insights or a clear sentiment, likely indicating a low-quality or mistranslated comment.