Cubic Odyssey Review Summary

Strong overall enjoyment reported: Many reviewers express strong overall enjoyment of the game, citing engaging gameplay loops, addictive qualities, and a relaxing experience. They find the game fun and entertaining, with some noting that time passes quickly while playing. Initial impressions are generally positive, and many recommend the game.

Polished with active development: Many reviewers have noted the game's high level of polish, especially when compared to other titles. They also appreciate the active development team, who are quick to address bugs and listen to player feedback. The game also offers a lot of content for a cheap price.

Combines Minecraft, No Man's Sky: The game is frequently compared to a blend of Minecraft and No Man's Sky, often described as a superior or more polished version of these games. Reviewers appreciate the mix of building, exploration, and survival elements, noting that it captures the best aspects of both while offering unique improvements and a refreshing experience.

Appealing and unique graphics: The game features appealing graphics, with some reviewers highlighting the water visuals and voxel-style graphics. The large, colorful open world and diverse procedurally generated environments contribute to an engaging experience. The night sky and overall aesthetics are also frequently praised.

Detailed world, encourages exploration: Reviewers praise the game's detailed world-building, dynamic environments, and physics-based mechanics that allow for creative manipulation of terrain. The game balances strategic problem-solving with action, and the diverse landscapes encourage exploration.

Co-op mode is fundamentally broken: Co-op mode is plagued with desynchronization, host-only progression, limited interaction for non-host players, and general instability. Many reviewers express strong dissatisfaction, stating that it feels like an unfinished or tacked-on feature. Some reviewers are refunding the game due to the poor co-op experience.

Co-op progression is host-dependent: Co-op play suffers from severe restrictions, with only the host able to progress quests, own vehicles/ships, and interact fully with the world. This creates a frustrating and unequal experience for non-host players, limiting their agency and participation.

Co-op crafting/building is restrictive: Co-op crafting and base building are hampered by limitations such as the inability to share resources, chests, or construction machines. Only the host can craft from chests, and players cannot move objects in another player's base, restricting collaborative efforts.

Game lacks polish, contains bugs: Reviewers note a lack of polish, with various bugs, visual glitches, and translation errors present in the game. Some mechanics are confusing or require further refinement, indicating that the game may have been released prematurely.

Lacks depth and replayability: Some reviewers feel the game lacks depth and replay value, with repetitive quests and a linear story. The galaxy feels limited, and co-op progress doesn't carry over, diminishing the incentive to continue playing after the initial experience.

Exploration, mining, crafting, combat loop: The core gameplay loop revolves around exploring diverse planets, mining resources, crafting items and bases, and engaging in combat. Many reviewers compare the game to a blend of Minecraft and No Man's Sky, citing similarities in resource gathering, base building, and open-world exploration.

Questline and open-world freedom: The game offers a mix of quest-driven and open-ended gameplay. While there is a main storyline and side quests to guide players, they also have the freedom to explore and pursue their own objectives.

Unique planets with NPC interaction: Planets feature unique biomes, creatures, and secrets, including ancient ruins. Players can interact with NPCs in tribes and small cities to acquire quests and trade resources.

Mining is grindy: Mining is a core mechanic, but some reviewers find it grindy. The game requires digging up individual ore blocks after scanning, which some players find tedious.

Classes lack significant impact: The game features four classes, each providing different in-game bonuses. However, some reviewers feel that the classes currently lack significant impact on gameplay, though they may become more important later.

Generally good optimization and performance: The game generally exhibits good optimization, running smoothly on various hardware configurations, including the Steam Deck and older laptops. Some reviewers specifically noted better performance compared to Minecraft. Some players reported locked 144fps.

Multiplayer suffers from lag: Multiplayer and co-op modes suffer from lag issues, potentially due to the peer-to-peer server architecture. This can lead to problems with actions not registering correctly or delays in gameplay, especially outside the host's render distance.

Lag fixable by input adjustment: Initial lag issues can often be resolved by adjusting the language input method. This suggests a potential conflict or inefficiency in how the game handles input processing.

Mixed reviews; wait for fixes.: Many reviews express mixed feelings, with some recommending the game despite its flaws, while others suggest waiting for further development. Some reviewers mention they are refunding the game, or will change their review if issues are fixed. This suggests a divide in player experience, with some finding enjoyment despite the problems, while others are more critical.

Great single-player experience.: The single-player experience is generally considered enjoyable and well-executed. Many reviewers specifically recommend the game for solo play, highlighting its quality and suitability for single players. Some reviewers recommend against buying the game unless planning to play solo.

Good value for the price.: Many reviewers find the game to be worth its price, often describing it as cheap or a good value for the content offered. Some reviewers highly recommend the game and give it a perfect score. However, some reviewers do not believe the game is worth the current price because it feels incomplete and needs polish.

Game has great potential.: Reviewers express optimism about the game's future and potential for improvement. They are looking forward to future updates and content additions, and believe the developers are on the right track. Some reviewers express that supporting the developers is worthwhile due to the game's potential.

Good for exploration/puzzle fans.: The game is recommended for fans of exploration, puzzle-solving, and world design. Some reviewers consider it a unique sandbox alternative with no rivals in its genre. The game is considered worth playing.

Future content is anticipated: Reviewers are interested in future updates and content additions to the game. They are curious to see how the game will evolve and expand over time with new features and content.

Lack of server protection: Players are concerned about the lack of server protection, which allows anyone to join a game. There is high anticipation for dedicated servers to address this issue and provide a more controlled multiplayer experience.

Lacks depth of similar games: The game is compared to a smaller, less diverse version of Empyrion Galactic. This suggests that the game may lack the depth and variety found in similar titles.