ENTITY: THE BLACK DAY
Last updated: 2026-01-09
- Outstanding visual and atmospheric design captivates players
- Innovative fourth-wall-breaking humor engages audiences
- Unique gameplay mechanics enhance player experience
- High difficulty frustrates and challenges players
- Poor shooting feedback disrupts combat satisfaction
- Stiff movement and controls hinder gameplay fluidity
Emotions
Players frequently cite performance issues like FPS drops, poor optimization, and hardware compatibility problems as major sources of frustration. Additionally, gameplay mechanics such as stiff controls, scarce ammunition, unrefined combat, and poorly designed puzzles or levels exacerbate the negative experience, often making progression feel unfair or unnecessarily difficult.
The game falls short of expectations due to its short length, unfinished or clichéd story, and unpolished elements like stiff movement, awkward animations, and weak combat mechanics. Players also express dissatisfaction with the price-to-quality ratio, unskippable cutscenes, and a general sense that the game's potential was not fully realized.
Players feel excitement due to the game's engaging narrative, unique atmosphere, and horror elements, which create a strong initial impression. The anticipation for future updates or installments, as well as the game's potential for delivering a fresh experience, also contribute to this emotion.
The game earns admiration for its unique mechanics, high-quality visuals, and immersive atmosphere, often attributed to the developer's effort, especially in cases of solo development. Players also praise the story, character interactions, and the overall craftsmanship that sets the game apart from others in the genre.
Players feel satisfied with the game's smooth performance, particularly on platforms like the Steam Deck, and the eventual mastery of its mechanics. Positive experiences with specific features, such as receiving powerful in-game items or the overall gameplay length, also contribute to this emotion.
Verdict
Mixed
Summary
Positive 62% · Negative 38%. Score: 38 / 100
Positives:
- The game is widely praised for its high-quality visuals, including lighting, textures, and scene details, which effectively create a tense and immersive horror atmosphere. Players highlight the cinematic quality and attention to environmental storytelling.
- The game stands out for its humorous interactions where the main character breaks the fourth wall, engaging players directly. This feature is frequently cited as a highlight, reducing monotony and adding uniqueness to the experience.
- Players appreciate the fresh and innovative gameplay elements, such as interactive tutorials, QR code integration, and unique boss fights. The relationship between the protagonist and the player is noted for creating psychological engagement.
- The narrative is praised for its emotional depth, engaging cutscenes, and well-controlled pacing. Players find the story innovative and immersive, drawing them into the game world effectively.
- The game is recognized for being developed by a single programmer, with players impressed by the quality and execution given the limited resources. This adds to the game's appeal and uniqueness.
Negatives:
- The game's difficulty is criticized for being too high, with scarce ammunition, punishing mechanics (e.g., forced melee combat), and malicious level design (e.g., hidden mines). Players feel the challenge is artificial and detracts from enjoyment.
- Shooting mechanics lack polish, with weak hit feedback, misaligned aim, and unrefined melee combat. Players describe the combat as unrewarding, stiff, and unresponsive, exacerbating frustration during fights.
- Character movement feels slow, clunky, and unresponsive, with awkward animations and limited customization (e.g., no key rebinding). Poor controller/keyboard support further worsens the experience.
- Extreme ammunition scarcity forces players into unfavorable tactics (e.g., melee combat) and creates artificial difficulty. Enemies respawn without replenishing ammo, making progression stressful.
- Numerous bugs affect gameplay, including interaction glitches, visibility issues, and unskippable cutscenes. Some bugs (e.g., enemy 'pop-in') break immersion and fairness.
Gameplay:
- Combat emphasizes melee attacks (e.g., knife) for close encounters while allowing ranged weapons for strategic engagement. Shooting is secondary to story progression, with mechanics like timed reloads and enemy avoidance adding depth.
- The game features classic survival horror elements like limited ammunition, scarce healing items, and tense combat in confined spaces, similar to *Resident Evil* and *Dead Space*. Players must manage resources carefully while navigating dark environments with hidden enemies.
- Gameplay involves solving environmental puzzles (e.g., cutting power, QR codes) and exploring a secret underground lab. Puzzles are integrated with combat and narrative progression, minimizing backtracking.
- Enemies are fast, numerous insect-like creatures that appear dynamically, requiring strategic combat and resource management. Their unpredictable spawns heighten tension.
- The game uses a fixed third-person camera (right-shoulder view) without perspective-switching options. This design choice reinforces the horror atmosphere but limits player control.
Performance:
- Performance is heavily influenced by resolution (e.g., 4K vs. 1440p) and graphics settings. Some players achieve smooth gameplay on mid-range hardware (e.g., GTX 1660 Ti) with custom settings.
- Issues with ultra-wide and widescreen monitor support are noted, potentially affecting immersion and gameplay experience for users with such setups.
- Players using Proton GE 9.27 or later report performance problems, suggesting optimization gaps for Linux-based systems.
- Some players highlight issues with controller aiming sensitivity, which may impact combat precision and overall control.
Recommendations:
- Several reviews argue the game is overpriced at its current cost (e.g., 700 rubles) and suggest a maximum price of $9.99. Others note it’s worth the price for fans of the genre despite flaws.
- The game is widely recommended for fans of survival horror, atmospheric experiences, and narrative-driven gameplay, particularly those who enjoy franchises like Resident Evil or Dead Space. Many reviews highlight its unique identity and engaging storytelling.
- While many players highly recommend the game, some advise waiting for optimizations, price adjustments, or additional content (e.g., difficulty modes) before purchasing. A subset of reviewers explicitly do not recommend it due to current issues.
- Feedback highlights the need for improved melee/shooting synergy, more realistic weapon mechanics, and better ammo availability. Some players suggest waiting for optimizations if combat is a priority.
- Players frequently suggest adding customizable controls, multiple save options, and a first-person camera for better accessibility. These changes are seen as critical for broader appeal and smoother gameplay.
Miscellaneous:
- Players expressed appreciation and personal messages to the developer, indicating strong community support and engagement. This reflects a positive reception of the game's development process.
- Players criticized the need to scan a QR code with a phone to obtain in-game door access codes, describing it as cumbersome and disruptive to immersion.
- Players suggested adding a multiplayer co-op mode, highlighting demand for collaborative gameplay features. This could enhance replayability and social interaction.
- The game's Early Access status was mentioned, suggesting players are aware of its developmental stage. This may imply expectations for future updates or improvements.
