Wargame: Red Dragon
Last updated: 2026-02-16
- Highly praised game quality and engaging multiplayer experience.
- Extensive unit diversity and high-quality graphics.
- Interesting campaign mode and large-scale battles.
- Unit behavior problems and not newbie-friendly.
- Toxic community and poor tutorial system.
- AI needs improvement and lack of single-player content.
Emotions
Players are frustrated by the game's high difficulty, lack of tutorials, and poor newbie-friendliness, making it challenging to learn and enjoy. Additionally, technical issues such as server problems, graphical glitches, and account creation issues contribute to the frustration. The toxic community and lack of support for new players further exacerbate these feelings.
Players feel disappointed due to the game not meeting their expectations, particularly with the lack of single-player experience and support for different platforms like Linux and Mac. The game's mechanics, balance issues, and lack of updates and DLC also contribute to this disappointment.
Players enjoy the game's strategic depth, customization options, and the satisfaction of using advanced tactics. The fun maps and the overall engaging gameplay experience contribute to their enjoyment.
Players are excited about the game's depth, variety, and unique gameplay mechanics. The realistic strategy elements, detailed graphics, and the adrenaline of large-scale warfare contribute to their excitement.
Players feel satisfied with the game's detailed graphics, sound effects, and the sense of a hard-earned victory. The improved AI and modding support, along with the engaging strategic battles, contribute to their satisfaction.
Core metrics
Core business metrics
Steam review mix, revenue model, and refund leakage.
Steam review stats
- Steam rating
- Very Positive (8/10)
- Total reviews
- 19,570
- Positive
- 17,32388.5%
- Negative
- 2,24711.5%
Sales estimations
- Estimated sales count
- 1,363,622
- Estimated revenue
- $40,895,024
- Game price
- $30
- Review → sale ratio
Refund leakage
- Refund-intent reviews
- 202.43%
- Estimated copies lost
- 1,394
- Estimated revenue lost
- $41,806
Review pace
Statistical analysis
Sentiment vs playtime and velocity signals.
Sentiment × Playtime
review counts| Bucket | Neg | Pos |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 2h playtime | 202.4% Avg playtime 0.6h | 111.3% Avg playtime 0.8h |
| > 2h playtime | 12515.2% Avg playtime 322h | 66881.1% Avg playtime 409h |
Velocity
review pace| Avg/day | 0.2 rev/day |
| Last 30d | 1.3 rev/day |
| Quarterly | 13.3 rev/qtr |
| Days covered | 4,358.3 days |
Audience segments
Who is reviewing
Buyer mixes, lifecycle phase, and Steam Deck signals.
Buyer vs key activations
Share of review volume
824 total
Organic purchasers67782.2%
Voted up: 83%
Key activations14717.8%
Voted up: 82%
Honeymoon vs endgame
Based on hours played
824 total
First impression0-2h455.46%
Voted up: 47%
Mid game2-10h11313.7%
Voted up: 81%
Late game10-20h8710.6%
Voted up: 84%
Endgame20h+57970.3%
Voted up: 85%
Steam Deck monitor
Deck vs global sentiment
Deck satisfaction
100.0%
Global baseline 82.4%
1 Steam Deck-tagged reviews out of 19,570 total.