Scarlet Tower Review Summary

Last updated: 2025-06-14
  • Addictive Vampire Survivors-like gameplay with deep progression.
  • Visually appealing pixel art style enhances experience.
  • Day/night cycle adds unique gameplay element.
  • Numerous bugs significantly hinder gameplay experience.
  • Lacks variety in weapons and characters.
  • Unbalanced difficulty leads to one-shot deaths.
Scarlet Tower header

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Fun, addictive, and enjoyable gameplay: The game is consistently described as fun, addictive, and enjoyable, with a strong replay factor. Players find it easy to pick up and play, suitable for both short bursts and longer sessions, and appreciate the constant updates and new content that keep the experience fresh and engaging.

Visually appealing pixel art style: The game features beautiful and detailed pixel art graphics, visually appealing effects, and a coherent aesthetic. The art style is often compared favorably to other games in the genre, with reviewers praising the attention to detail and overall visual polish.

Deep customization and progression: The game offers a wide array of characters, weapons, skills, and upgrades, allowing for extensive customization and build variety. The progression system is considered satisfying, with many unlockables and permanent upgrades that increase replay value and provide a sense of accomplishment.

Improved Vampire Survivors-like gameplay: The game is frequently compared to Vampire Survivors, with many reviewers considering it a superior or more polished version of the formula. It successfully incorporates elements from other genres, addresses issues found in similar games, and offers a unique gameplay experience within the survivor-like genre.

Atmospheric music and sound effects: The game features a fitting soundtrack and well-designed sound effects that complement the atmosphere and enhance the gameplay experience. The music is often described as energetic, spooky, and inspired by classic games like Castlevania.

Common complaints

Numerous bugs hinder gameplay: The game is plagued with numerous bugs, ranging from minor inconveniences to game-breaking issues that halt progression or corrupt save data. Many reviewers mention that these bugs significantly detract from the overall experience, with some even calling the game unplayable. The frequency of bugs has been noted to increase after updates, and some bugs persist despite patch releases.

Lacks weapon/character variety: Reviewers express dissatisfaction with the limited weapon and character variety, as well as the lack of meaningful progression. Many weapons and upgrades feel generic or underpowered, and the impact of passive stat power-ups is often negligible. This leads to repetitive gameplay and a diminished sense of accomplishment.

Poor translation and localization: Many reviewers cite poor translation quality as a major issue, with examples of machine translation, untranslated text, and confusing or nonsensical phrases. This makes it difficult for players to understand game mechanics, skill descriptions, and the overall story. Additionally, some reviewers mention a lack of joystick mapping and Turkish language support.

Unbalanced difficulty, one-shot deaths: The game suffers from significant balance issues, with enemies dealing excessive damage and often killing players in one or two hits, even on lower difficulties. This leads to frustrating and unfair deaths, especially in later stages or in the endless mode. Some characters are also significantly stronger than others, creating an uneven playing field.

Excessive grinding, repetitive gameplay: The game requires excessive grinding to unlock content, progress through difficulty levels, and achieve platinum status. This repetitive gameplay can feel sluggish and monotonous, especially for players eager to unlock things quickly. The advancement system is also described as over-complicated, making progression feel like a chore.

Gameplay and performance

Vampire Survivors-like with additions: The game shares core mechanics with Vampire Survivors, tasking players with surviving enemy waves while leveling up. However, it introduces its own unique elements, such as a dodge mechanic, item equipping, and more strategic enemy movement. Some reviewers feel it is too similar, while others appreciate the added depth.

Bullet hell auto-shooter gameplay: The game is a bullet hell auto-shooter where the character automatically attacks, and the player focuses on dodging enemy projectiles. It includes common features of the genre like auto-aim and meta-progression systems. The game also offers options for auto-leveling and an in-game encyclopedia.

Day/night cycle impacts gameplay: The game features a day and night cycle that affects enemy spawns and character abilities. This mechanic adds a layer of strategy as players must adapt to the changing conditions. Some reviewers find this mechanic interesting and engaging.

Multiple maps with unique challenges: The game features multiple maps with different enemy types, conditions, and increasing difficulty levels. Players must adapt their strategies to the unique challenges presented by each map. Events and points of interest on the map encourage constant movement.

Lacks depth and variation: Some reviewers feel the game lacks depth and differentiation from other survivor-like games. The core gameplay loop can become repetitive, and the game lacks a full map, offering only a mini-map. There is no story.

Inconsistent performance, optimization issues: Many players report experiencing performance issues such as FPS drops, stuttering, lag, freezes, and crashes. Some reviews indicate that performance has worsened after updates, while others note improvements or solid performance on specific hardware like the Steam Deck. The inconsistency suggests optimization issues that affect different systems and game versions.

Runs on low-end PCs: Some players are reporting that the game can run on low-end PCs. This is a positive sign for accessibility, but it contrasts with other reports of performance issues on higher-end hardware.

High-end GPU needed for performance: One review suggests that a high-end graphics card (RTX 4090) may be needed to achieve high frame rates on higher difficulties due to the number of on-screen elements. This indicates that the game's performance may scale poorly with increased graphical intensity.

Steam Deck control integration issue: One review mentions an issue with mouse control being integrated into the joystick on the Steam Deck. This suggests a control scheme problem specific to that platform.

V-sync fix ineffective: One review mentions that turning off v-sync, a common troubleshooting step, did not resolve the performance issues. This suggests that the performance problems may be more deeply rooted than simple settings adjustments can fix.

Recommendations

Unpolished; wait for fixes: Many reviewers do not recommend purchasing the game in its current state due to significant issues. Common complaints include numerous bugs, balancing problems, lack of polish, and performance issues, leading some to feel like they are beta-testing a flawed product. Some reviewers are hopeful for future improvements but suggest waiting for substantial updates before buying.

Enjoyable, good value for price: Despite the criticisms, some reviewers find the game enjoyable, especially considering its low price. They highlight its potential, addictive nature, and the developer's responsiveness. The game is often described as a good value for the money, providing hours of entertainment.

Highly rated, has potential: Some reviewers rate the game highly, praising its potential and addictive qualities. These reviewers often give scores of 8/10 or higher, with some even considering it a masterpiece within its genre. However, these high ratings are sometimes conditional on future updates or bug fixes.

Compared to Vampire Survivors: Many reviewers compare the game to Vampire Survivors and other similar titles in the genre. Some recommend it to fans of Vampire Survivors, while others suggest that there are better alternatives available, citing a lack of innovation or unique elements. Scarlet Tower is specifically mentioned as a solid entry, but with caveats about balance issues.

Good for casual play: Some reviewers recommend the game for casual play or stress relief, while others suggest it only for those seeking a challenging experience. This indicates a divergence in player experience and perceived difficulty.

Other review notes

Active development, missed update: The developers are actively updating the game and listening to feedback, which is expected given its early access status. However, a promised update was missed, which could be a cause for concern.

Specific gameplay improvement suggestions: Reviewers have provided specific suggestions for improving the game, such as increasing enemy density, adding a vacuum drop for resources, speeding up corruption in infinite mode, and adding a fast forward option for equipment refinement. These suggestions aim to improve the gameplay experience and address specific pain points.

Incomplete/questionable translations: The game supports multiple languages, but some translations are missing or questionable. While generally understandable, this can detract from the overall experience.

Lacking in-game information: Some players feel the game lacks sufficient in-game information about its mechanics, even with the addition of a bestiary and weapon encyclopedia. This may be due to its early access state, but more clarity could improve the player experience.

Grindy, luck-dependent progression: The game's progression system relies heavily on grinding resources to upgrade runes, and luck plays a significant role. This combination may lead to a frustrating experience for some players.