- Engaging and fun party game experience
- Unfair and difficult AI challenges players
- Performance and stability issues reported
- Overpriced for the amount of content
- Repetitive and dull mini-games
- No public online matchmaking available
Emotions
Players are highly satisfied with the game's overall quality, fun and varied minigames, and unique board designs. Many appreciate its charm, humor, and polished mechanics, often viewing it as a superior or excellent alternative to Mario Party, especially on PC with effective remote play and online capabilities. The game's value, customization options, and lack of bugs also contribute significantly to player enjoyment.
Disappointment stems primarily from missing features, particularly the lack of online matchmaking and friend pass options, which limits multiplayer accessibility. Players also express frustration over limited content (boards, customization), dull minigames, and the absence of specific language localizations. Issues with game performance, misleading advertising, and the perceived high price point for the current content further contribute to this sentiment.
Frustration is largely driven by technical issues such as unplayable lag, crashes, and frame stuttering, alongside poor keyboard controls and broken AI. A significant cause is the complete lack of public online matchmaking, forcing players to rely on bots or local friends, which many find unacceptable. Missing language subtitles and unfair gameplay mechanics (e.g., RNG determining wins, AI exploiting mechanics) also contribute to player annoyance, sometimes leading to refunds.
Players are excited about the game's high quality, fun gameplay, and its potential as a leading party game. Many express enthusiasm for future content, including potential DLC and post-launch updates, believing the game can surpass competitors. Its performance on platforms like Steam Deck and its overall chaotic and humorous nature also generate significant excitement.
Hope is centered on the desire for future game improvements and content additions. Players specifically hope for the implementation of public online matchmaking, a Friend Pass system, more boards, minigames, and customization features. There is also a strong desire for active developer responsiveness, bug fixes, and continued updates to enhance the game experience.
Verdict
Mostly positive
Summary
Positive 75% · Negative 25%. Score: 25 / 100
Positives:
- Players consistently praise the game as a highly enjoyable and well-designed party experience, often highlighting its unique minigames, charming LEGO aesthetic, and overall polished feel. It's considered a strong contender in the genre, offering hours of fun for families and friends.
- Many reviewers see this game as a direct and often superior competitor to the Mario Party series, especially for PC players. They appreciate its affordability, cross-platform play, and fresh mechanics that reduce reliance on randomness, making it a compelling choice for fans of the genre.
- The game offers deep and generous character customization, allowing players to create unique minifigures from a wide array of unlockable parts. This feature adds a personal touch and replayability, with new items earned through gameplay and leveling.
- The game features unique and exciting boards that evolve in real-time based on player actions, adding strategic depth. These boards are praised for their charm, visual appeal, and creative designs, including thematic challenge zones.
- Reviewers frequently commend the game's high production values, including detailed animations, good graphics, and a strong LEGO aesthetic. The humor, often delivered through slapstick and character design, adds to the game's overall charm and appeal.
Negatives:
- The AI is consistently described as overly difficult and unfair, even on easier settings. Players report that bots often 'hack' or are 'rigged,' making the experience frustrating and unrewarding, especially when forced to play with them due to a lack of online matchmaking.
- The game suffers from severe lag, frequent crashes, and general instability, particularly during mini-games and online play. This significantly detracts from the gameplay experience, making many mini-games unplayable and leading to frustration.
- Many players feel the game's price point ($35-$40 / £30 / €33-36) is too high, especially given the perceived lack of content and issues. This high price makes it difficult to convince friends to purchase the game, hindering its social aspect.
- Some mini-games are criticized for being dull, uninspired, or too simple, often relying on basic navigation controls. This contributes to a feeling of incompleteness and a lack of reward, making the overall experience less engaging.
- Players are frustrated by the complete absence of public online matchmaking, making it difficult to find games with strangers and limiting the game to private sessions with friends or bots. This is seen as a significant oversight for a modern party game.
Gameplay:
- The game supports a maximum of 4 players, which some found restrictive compared to similar titles, though mini-games are adapted for this count.
- Accepting game invitations with a controller can be problematic, often requiring the use of Big Picture mode to resolve.
- While keyboard controls are functional, some mini-games are reportedly better experienced when played with a controller.
- The Challenge Zone requires four players, which often necessitates filling slots with bots if human players are unavailable.
- Unlike some comparable party games, this game does not feature mechanics for eliminating other players.
Performance:
- Many players praised the game for being remarkably stable and bug-free, especially during initial gameplay hours. This suggests a polished experience for most users.
- Some players reported slight performance issues and occasional stutters, particularly when building map sections or on specific hardware like the Steam Deck. However, other players experienced smooth gameplay without any issues.
Recommendations:
- A significant number of players express that the game's recommendation hinges on the addition of an online matchmaking or lobby system to easily queue with or join random players. Without this feature, some reviewers are hesitant to recommend or have even refunded the game.
- Lag problems, particularly when playing with friends, are a significant concern. Some players state they would change their negative review or only recommend the game once these technical issues are resolved.
- Many players highly recommend the game, especially when played with friends. It's seen as a must-play for partygoers and a solid choice for an online party game experience, particularly for those who enjoy Mario Party-esque titles. However, solo play is not recommended.
- Players are looking forward to future content and hope the game receives ongoing support and updates. Some are waiting for more content before purchasing, indicating a desire for increased longevity and variety.
- A small number of players have either refunded the game or are considering doing so, often tied to the lack of matchmaking or unresolved technical issues.
Miscellaneous:
- There's a strong desire for more boards, mini-games, and general content to prevent repetition and keep the game fresh. Players also suggest features like bonus gold bricks at the end of games and a sandbox editor for custom maps.
- Players frequently request public matchmaking, the ability to create or join lobbies without codes, and a 'Friend Pass' system to make it easier to play with others. This would significantly enhance the game's social aspect and accessibility.
- Players have minor suggestions such as customizing local multiplayer names and adjusting stage difficulty options. There's also a note about the existence of a commentator toggle.
- The game is confirmed to work well on the Steam Deck, including controller support for local multiplayer, which is a positive point for portable gaming.
- Some players have noted that changes are needed for the game's controls and keybinds to improve the overall gameplay experience.
