
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:
Review evidence
An amazing art style and engaging gameplay make this a great game overall, but the unfairly frustrating boss fights and brutally difficult final levels hold it back, falling short of Pizza Tower.
Game is excellent overall: Players consistently praise the game as excellent, fun, and well-made, with positive sentiment across multiple reviews. The core experience is highly regarded and recommended.
Art style is amazing: The art style is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, described as appealing, fantastic, and unique. The visual presentation contributes significantly to the game's appeal.
Gameplay is engaging and fun: Gameplay is consistently praised as enjoyable, responsive, and rewarding, with positive mentions of its addictiveness. The core mechanics are well-received by players.
Platforming is excellent and smooth: Players highlight the platforming as excellent, smooth, and satisfying, with particular praise for its speed-based elements. It is considered one of the best platforming experiences.
Soundtrack is fantastic: The soundtrack is consistently praised as fantastic, incredible, and outstanding, often singled out as a highlight. Music contributes strongly to the overall enjoyment.
Final levels extremely difficult: The last level and boss present a severe difficulty spike, with the final running level and boss requiring hours of attempts. Many players find the final trio of levels frustrating and excessively hard.
Inferior to Pizza Tower: Players consistently compare the game unfavorably to Pizza Tower, citing weaker charm, humor, level design, soundtrack, and less dynamic movement. The character feels slower and movement options are fewer, making gameplay less fun overall.
Boss fights frustrating and unfair: Bosses are described as frustrating roadblocks with cheap tricks, damage-sponge behavior, and multiple forms. They often require dying many times to learn, leading to a negative experience.
Poor default keyboard controls: Default keyboard controls are considered unplayable or fiddly, with a strong preference for controller. Keybinding issues make the game awkward for keyboard players.
Visual clutter hampers gameplay: Excessive on-screen effects and projectile spam cause visual noise, making it hard to tell what is happening during fast-paced sections and boss fights. This leads to confusion and frustration.
Fast-paced action platformer: The game is consistently described as a fast-paced, energetic platformer with precision jumping and momentum-based movement. It emphasizes speed and flow, making it a core part of the gameplay experience.
Inspired by Pizza Tower: Many reviews compare the game to Pizza Tower, noting similarities in mechanics and chaos while also pointing out distinct differences. Some say it is more hectic, while others note slower pacing or fewer movement options.
Diverse boss fights: Boss battles feature unique tactics, multiple phases, and chaotic mechanics that are often unexplained. These fights contribute to the game's challenge and are a memorable part of the experience.
Wario Land and Crash Bandicoot influences: The game draws clear inspiration from Wario Land and Crash Bandicoot, blending their platforming styles. This mix is frequently mentioned, highlighting its unique identity among classic-inspired games.
Unique level gimmicks: Each level features its own gimmick, such as unique mechanics and challenges, keeping gameplay varied and interesting. This design choice is a highlight for many reviewers.
Random crashes occur: Multiple random crashes are reported, causing frustration and interrupting gameplay. This is a stability issue that needs addressing.
PC performance praised: The PC version offers smooth frame rates and responsive controls, indicating good performance and playability on that platform.
Handles heavy action well: The game runs well even during heavy action scenes, indicating robust performance under demanding conditions.
Runs on weak laptops: Players report that the game can run on a very old, weak laptop as long as the system is 64-bit. This indicates good optimization for low-end hardware.
Fullscreen mode glitch: Fullscreen mode may shrink the game window and not fix itself until restarting the game. This is a disruptive bug for players using fullscreen.
Must-play for Pizza Tower fans: Many reviewers recommend ANTONBLAST to fans of Pizza Tower and Wario Land, citing its similar gameplay and style. Some also suggest playing Pizza Tower first, as it is considered a better experience by a few.
Great for platformer enthusiasts: Reviewers consistently recommend the game to platformer enthusiasts, especially those who enjoy momentum-based and high-energy platforming. The game is praised for its challenging and frantic gameplay.
Worth buying at any price: Reviewers advise buying the game, often stating it is worth the money, even at full price. Some note it is especially good value when on sale or discounted.
Appeals to Wario Land fans: The game is frequently compared to Wario Land and Crash Bandicoot, appealing to fans of those series. A minority recommend playing Wario Land 4 instead, as they find it more refined and less frantic.
Highly recommended by many: A large number of reviewers give an unconditional recommendation, praising the game without reservations. These reviews highlight the game's overall quality and enjoyment.
Community fair range: $10.00 - $20.00.
Story completion: 6.0h.
Antonblast starts with friction from an unexplained tutorial, sensory overload, and high difficulty, but becomes highly addictive and fun once players stop fighting its chaotic rhythm and let the movement click.
Friction: Tutorial does not explain controls; Visually and audibly overwhelming; High difficulty causing frustration; Player must stop fighting the game's rhythm.
Unlock drivers: Stop fighting the game's rhythm; Get past sensory overload; Movement and pacing 'click'; Learn to chain spin attacks.
Speed Junkie: Aggressive, momentum-driven, seeking fast clears and grind rails. Motivation: Adrenaline rush from maintaining high speed and chaotic violence. Stance: buy.
Completionist Adviser: Exploratory but completion-focused, ultimately frustrated by hidden collectibles. Motivation: To warn others about the punishing completion process. Stance: no buy.
Nostalgic Platformer Fan: Laid-back exploration and enjoyment of cartoonish humor and levels. Motivation: Nostalgia for Wario Land and Crash Bandicoot style gameplay. Stance: buy.
Steam Deck: The game runs without major technical barriers on Steam Deck, but suffers from control precision, camera instability, and limited controller compatibility. These issues may require tinkering with control mappings or input settings, but no crashes or launcher problems are reported.
Frequently compared to Pizza Tower: Many reviews compare this game to Pizza Tower, with mixed opinions on which is better. Some find this game superior in aspects like challenge and faithfulness to Wario Land, while others prefer Pizza Tower's gameplay and charm.
Compared to Wario Land series: The game is often likened to the Wario Land series, especially Wario Land 4, for its gameplay, sound, and spiritual succession. It is also compared to Crash Bandicoot and Donkey Kong Country Returns as similar 2D platformers.
Compared to Pizza Tower and others: The game is compared to a wide range of titles including Pizza Tower, Wario Land, Crash Bandicoot, and Sonic. These comparisons highlight its diverse influences and appeal to fans of multiple franchises.
Compared to Pizza Tower as better: Some reviews believe this game surpasses Pizza Tower in various aspects, such as gameplay, music, and visuals. They find it more challenging and rewarding, offering a distinct experience.
Similar to Pizza Tower but distinct: While often compared to Pizza Tower, the game is seen as having its own unique feel with a bouncier movement system. This distinguishes it from its inspiration.