Broken Arrow

Players are frustrated by pervasive technical issues including constant bugs, crashes, server instability, poor optimization, and anti-cheat problems that prevent gameplay. This is compounded by severe balance issues, particularly perceived excessive nerfs to one faction and overpowered units in another, alongside a prevalent cheating problem and uncooperative teammates in multiplayer. Developer inaction or seemingly ineffective 'balancing' efforts further fuel this frustration.

Disappointment largely stems from the game failing to live up to its initial potential or a promising beta, often perceived as worsening since release. This includes a decline in overall quality, persistent technical flaws, and a lack of essential features, leading to the game feeling unfinished or not worth its price. Developer mismanagement, slow updates, and a perceived inability to address core problems contribute to a sense of unfulfilled expectations.

Satisfaction comes from the engaging core gameplay, which includes strategic depth, unit customization, and fast-paced tactical combat. Players appreciate the high-quality graphics, immersive sound design, and detailed unit models. Perceived developer support, continuous updates, and effective resolutions to critical issues like anti-cheat and balance also contribute to overall player contentment.

Anger is primarily directed at developers for perceived incompetence, illogical balance decisions, and biased treatment of factions, especially when feedback is ignored or updates worsen the game. Outrage is also expressed over rampant technical failures, persistent cheating problems that developers fail to address, and unfair penalties incurred due to game issues. This often results in players feeling scammed or betrayed.

Players express hope for the game's significant potential to become a great RTS title, despite current issues. There is a strong desire for developers to properly address existing technical problems, fix balance issues, introduce new content like factions and modes, and implement quality-of-life features. This hope is often tied to a continued belief that developers will listen to feedback and actively work towards improving the game's state.