'83 Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-04-24
  • Enjoyable and improved gunplay mechanics
  • Promising developer roadmap and support
  • Good optimization and reasonable pricing
  • Severe performance and stability issues
  • Game feels unfinished and buggy
  • Lacks content and polished features
'83 header

Emotions

Archetypes

Hardware

Windows 12-15GB VRAMpositiveWindows <8GB VRAMnegative

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Enjoyable gunplay: The gunplay mechanics are well-received, with players finding them solid, enjoyable, and realistic.

Similar to Rising Storm 2: Many players feel that the game closely resembles Rising Storm 2 in terms of gameplay and overall feel, often referring to it as a successor.

Game praised for improvements: Players have noted significant improvements in the game since its beta phase, highlighting its progress and solid gameplay.

Game has potential: Players see a lot of potential in the game, suggesting that with consistent development, it could become even better.

Promising dev roadmap: The development roadmap is seen as promising, giving players hope for future updates and improvements.

Common complaints

Severe performance issues: The game suffers from significant performance problems, including FPS drops, unsteady performance, and optimization issues, making it difficult to play smoothly.

Game feels unfinished: The game is perceived as unfinished, with many issues and a lack of polish. Players feel that it needs significant improvement and more development time.

Poor graphics quality: Players find the graphics to be lackluster, with dull and bland visuals that do not meet expectations. The graphics are often described as meh or horrible.

Buggy and unpolished gameplay: Gameplay feels unpolished and raw, with flawed mechanics and a lack of refinement. Tanks, in particular, are noted to be janky and buggy.

Lacks content and features: The game is criticized for having barebones content, with only a few maps available and a lack of features that players expect.

Gameplay and performance

Comparisons to Rising Storm 2: Many players compare the game to Rising Storm 2, noting it feels like a spiritual successor with similar gameplay mechanics and style.

Slow-paced and arcade-like gameplay: The gameplay is described as slow-paced and true to the series' formula, with an arcade-like feel that balances tactical and arcade elements.

Weapon and gunplay mechanics: The weapon mechanics and gunplay are highlighted as strong points, with responsive and satisfying gunplay that feels good to players.

Balance of tactical and arcade: The game strikes a balance between tactical and arcade gameplay, avoiding the extremes of being too tactical or too arcade-like.

Clunky movement and gunplay: Some players find the movement and gunplay mechanics to be clunky, which can detract from the overall experience.

Performance and optimization issues: Many players report poor performance, including low FPS, frame rate drops, and general optimization problems. These issues are widespread across different hardware setups.

Server and connectivity problems: Players experience various server-related issues such as high ping, rubber banding, teleporting, and general connectivity problems. These issues significantly impact the gameplay experience.

Positive performance on certain setups: Some players report decent performance on their setups, indicating that the game can run well under certain conditions and hardware configurations.

Crashes and stability issues: Some players report crashes to desktop and general stability issues. These problems can occur even from the menu and affect the overall gameplay experience.

Visual and graphical issues: There are reports of visual issues such as TAA smears, FXAA artifacts, and general graphical problems. These issues affect the visual quality and overall experience.

Recommendations

Support the developers: Several reviews encourage buying the game to support the developers and their ongoing projects.

Wait for further updates: Many suggest waiting for a few months for additional polish and updates before purchasing the game.

Fans of Rising Storm recommended: Players who enjoyed Rising Storm 2's gameplay are likely to appreciate this game as it offers a similar feel.

Recommended for tactical shooter fans: The game is recommended for fans of tactical shooters who enjoy a faster pace and constant action.

Try Assault game mode: A recommendation to play the Assault game mode, highlighting it as a notable feature.

Buying context

Community fair range: $20.00 - $25.00.

Session length: 1.0h.

The game has a mix of elements from other popular games and can be fun in multiplayer matches, especially when played with friends. However, initial friction points such as boring maps and fast pacing may delay the fun.

Reported time to anchor: 1h.

Friction: boring maps; fast pacing; lack of audio feedback.

Unlock drivers: playing with friends; multiplayer matches.

Player profiles

Rising Storm Veteran: Tactical and strategic, enjoying the core mechanics and gameplay similar to Rising Storm. Motivation: Nostalgia and familiarity with the Rising Storm series. Stance: buy.

Critical Evaluator: Analytical and critical, focusing on the game's performance and overall quality. Motivation: Seeking a polished and well-optimized gaming experience. Stance: sale.

Tactical Balancer: Tactical but with a preference for a faster pace and constant action. Motivation: Enjoying a balanced mix of realism and action in tactical shooters. Stance: buy.

Platform notes

Performance varies significantly across hardware cohorts, with higher VRAM generally yielding better results. Lower VRAM cohorts struggle with consistent frame rates and optimization issues.

Windows 12-15GB VRAM: positive. Mostly positive performance with some reports of lag and frame drops, but generally runs well.

Windows <8GB VRAM: negative. Struggles with consistent frame rates and optimization issues, often failing to maintain stable FPS even on low settings.

Windows 8-11GB VRAM: positive. Generally positive performance with some reports of lag and frame drops, but mostly runs well.

Steam Deck: The game suffers from significant performance issues, including low and unstable framerates, which severely impact the user experience. Graphical quality is another major concern, with users reporting dated visuals and ineffective upscaling options. Gameplay and controls are also criticized for being clunky and lacking essential features. Despite these issues, the game is noted for its compatibility with Linux via Proton, which is a positive aspect.

Linux and Proton: The game is reported to work well on Linux via Proton with good performance and no game-breaking bugs.

Other review notes

Linux Compatibility via Proton: The game works on Linux through Proton, which is beneficial for Linux users who want to play the game.

Confusing Game Name: The name '83' is confusing to some players, potentially affecting the game's marketability or causing misunderstandings.