Serious Sam HD: The First Encounter Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-01-19
  • Chaotic and satisfying combat experience
  • Diverse and engaging enemy variety
  • Exceptional nostalgic remaster quality
  • Outstanding co-op multiplayer mode
  • Poor level and boss design issues
  • Technical issues and bugs present
Serious Sam HD: The First Encounter header

Emotions

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Chaotic and satisfying combat: The game delivers relentless, fast-paced action with hordes of enemies, exaggerated weapons, and large-scale battles. Players highlight the satisfying combat loop of movement, reflexes, and overwhelming enemy waves, which creates an adrenaline-filled experience.

Diverse and engaging enemy variety: The game features a vast array of enemy types, each with unique designs, behaviors, and weaknesses. This variety keeps encounters fresh and requires players to adapt their strategies, adding depth to the chaotic combat.

Exceptional nostalgic remaster: The HD remaster of *Serious Sam* preserves the original's spirit while significantly improving graphics, textures, and fluidity. Players praise the modernized visuals, including enhanced lighting, detailed environments, and improved enemy models, which hold up well even by today's standards.

Outstanding co-op multiplayer: The co-op mode is a standout feature, supporting up to 16 players and enhancing replayability. Players enjoy the shared experience of tackling overwhelming enemy waves, which adds fun and prevents boredom, especially on higher difficulties.

Balanced and challenging difficulty: The game provides well-balanced difficulty settings that cater to both casual and hardcore players. Higher difficulties add more enemies and require strategic thinking, making the experience rewarding and replayable.

Common complaints

Poor level and boss design: Levels and bosses are criticized for being bland, repetitive, or poorly designed (e.g., counterintuitive mechanics, lack of variety). Some bosses are deemed boring or uninspired, while level design is called tedious or outdated.

Lack of narrative and content depth: The storyline is minimal, serving only as a backdrop for combat. Players note a lack of character development, progression systems, or meaningful exploration, making the game feel shallow or incomplete.

Outdated mechanics and presentation: The game feels obsolete compared to modern titles, with outdated graphics, sound, and mechanics (e.g., no sprint, limited mobility, awkward weapon switching). This deters newer players and fails to create a 'wow' effect.

Unfair enemy spawning and AI: Enemies spawn unpredictably (e.g., behind the player, during loot pickup) or in overwhelming numbers, often with cheap tactics (e.g., teleportation, hit-scan attacks). AI is described as basic or exploitative.

Technical issues and bugs: The game suffers from bugs (e.g., FPS-related spawn breaks, graphical glitches, auto-save freezes) and poor design choices (e.g., no mid-game difficulty changes, permanent door closures). Some levels are literally unfinishable due to bugs.

Gameplay and performance

Ancient Egypt-themed level design: Levels are set in vast, open environments inspired by ancient Egypt, featuring pyramids, temples, and deserts. The design includes secrets, traps, and interconnected spaces with no loading screens, encouraging exploration.

Classic run-and-gun FPS gameplay: The game preserves classic first-person shooter mechanics, emphasizing fast-paced, chaotic combat with no cover or health regeneration. Players engage in open arenas with a focus on movement, shooting, and ammunition management, reminiscent of golden-era FPS games.

No tactical depth or cover mechanics: The game deliberately avoids modern FPS mechanics like cover systems, reloading, or tactical depth. Combat is purely run-and-gun, focusing on reflexes, movement, and raw shooting skills in open arenas.

Manual save and progression system: Progress must be saved manually after completing arenas, adding a layer of challenge. The game lacks modern auto-save features, reinforcing its old-school design philosophy.

Massive enemy hordes and wave-based combat: The game features large-scale battles with hundreds of enemies, including diverse types like headless kamikazes and biomechanical horrors. Combat revolves around surviving waves of enemies in arena-style levels, requiring constant movement and weapon switching.

Exceptional optimization and performance: The game is highly optimized, running smoothly at 60+ FPS even on low-end hardware ('potato' PCs) and during mass battles. It supports modern APIs like Vulkan and 64-bit architecture while maintaining compatibility with older systems.

Minor graphical and FPS-related issues: Some players report colored spots on newer GPUs, frame rate drops on high-end cards (e.g., RTX 4070), and graphical glitches like polygon clipping. High FPS (120-150) may also cause monster spawn problems, suggesting a need for V-Sync or FPS limits.

Stability issues and crashes: While rare, crashes occur during co-op, resolution changes, or auto-saves. Some players also report RAM management problems, leading to freezes or desktop crashes.

Multiplayer connectivity problems: Multiplayer sessions suffer from high ping, connection drops, and occasional errors. These issues are frequent enough to impact online gameplay but are not universally experienced.

Recommendations

Highly recommended for classic FPS fans: The game is consistently praised for its nostalgic value, fast-paced action, and appeal to fans of old-school shooters. It delivers an uncomplicated, adrenaline-filled experience ideal for those seeking arcade-style gameplay.

Co-op and multiplayer recommended: Playing with friends or in co-op mode is highly encouraged, as it amplifies the chaotic, fun experience. The game shines as a social or group activity.

Series progression advice: For newcomers, playing the games in order (Classic → Revolution → HD) is recommended to fully appreciate the series' evolution. Later entries may offer improved experiences.

Best for stress relief and quick sessions: Players highlight the game as perfect for unwinding, offering pure fun without complex mechanics or storytelling. Its simplicity and chaotic action make it ideal for short, engaging play sessions.

Fusion mod enhances experience: The Fusion mod is frequently recommended for modern enhancements, including Vulkan support and Linux compatibility. It improves the overall experience, especially for those revisiting the classic.

Platform notes

Steam Deck: Serious Sam Fusion (2017) delivers a seamless and highly optimized experience on Linux, particularly on platforms like the Steam Deck. The game features native Vulkan support, eliminating the need for compatibility layers such as Proton. Users report flawless performance, zero crashes, and excellent controller support, contributing to a frictionless experience. The absence of complaints regarding UI readability or external launchers further underscores its accessibility and polish. Overall, the game exemplifies a well-executed native Linux port that works out of the box.

Other review notes

Minimal Story for Action Focus: The narrative is described as minimal, serving primarily as a backdrop for fast-paced action. The story involves time travel and alien invasions, but it is not the main focus of the gameplay experience.

Series Comparisons and Rankings: Players frequently compare the game to other entries in the Serious Sam series, often ranking them (e.g., SS4 > SS2 = SS1 > SS3). This reflects strong personal preferences and nostalgia for the franchise.

Short Game Length Criticized: Some players feel the game is too short, particularly if obtained for free. This feedback suggests expectations for longer gameplay or better value for money.

Nostalgic Early Exposure: Some players reflect on their early experiences with the game, such as playing it at age 5 or in computer clubs in the early 2000s. This highlights the game's long-standing appeal and nostalgic value.

Low Multiplayer Player Count: Players report a low number of active multiplayer participants, with only a handful observed over several days. This suggests limited engagement in the game's multiplayer mode.