Loot of Baal
Last updated: 2025-06-17
- Excellent idle/AFK multitasking loot grinding game
- Rich equipment system with Diablo-style loot
- Appealing retro pixel art style
- Poor UI/UX and display options
- Tedious inventory management
- Connectivity and server instability
Verdict
Mixed
Summary
Positive 73% · Negative 27%. Score: 27 / 100
Positives:
- The game is praised for its suitability as an idle or AFK game, allowing players to progress while multitasking, such as working or doing housework. Many reviewers specifically highlight its non-intrusive nature, making it easy to play in the background without disrupting other activities. Some reviewers express that the game is more interesting than other idle games.
- The game successfully blends idle gameplay with the depth and item systems of classic RPGs like Diablo 2. Reviewers appreciate the Diablo-like loot grinding, extensive equipment system, and character customization options, making it a satisfying experience for fans of the genre.
- The game offers a rich and engaging equipment system with diverse loot, crafting, and customization options. Reviewers enjoy the loot-grinding experience and the ability to create different builds based on the equipment they obtain.
- The game's art style, particularly its retro pixel art, is frequently praised for its visual appeal and nostalgic charm. Reviewers find the aesthetic pleasing and well-suited to the game's overall design.
- The game features an online trading system where players can exchange items with each other. Reviewers consider this a positive feature that enhances the fun and social aspect of the game.
Negatives:
- The game suffers from numerous UI/UX issues, including a lack of fullscreen mode and window resizing options, small and inconvenient UI elements, awkward screen ratios, and an overly complex and dense screen layout. These issues contribute to eye strain, clunkiness, and an overall poor user experience.
- Inventory management is cumbersome due to limited space, the lack of auto-selling features, inconvenient equipping processes, and a poorly designed item filter. Players must manually manage items, and essential convenience features are locked behind game progression.
- The game experiences frequent connection issues and server instability, rendering the online mode unplayable. Disconnections occur in both online and offline saves, requiring client restarts and disrupting gameplay.
- Character customization and team composition are limited by overly random skills, locked character skills, and a small pool of available skills. Additionally, item affixes are limited, and there is a lack of clear distinction between armor types.
- Despite being an idle game, the game's progress is slow, requiring frequent active attention. Leveling and character progression feel restricted, undermining the core appeal of the idle genre.
Gameplay:
- The game is an idle game with simple controls, often compared to a desktop version of Diablo 2 due to its item farming focus. Players can progress while AFK, making it suitable for casual play.
- Players recruit and equip team members with gear and charms to tackle dungeons. The core loop involves optimizing equipment, selling items, and upgrading teams.
- The game features a classic pixel art style and a dark theme, with some reviewers noting similarities to Loop Hero's visual style.
- Equipment farming is key, with a synthesis table for gem synthesis, set creation, and stat rerolling. Players spend time experimenting with equipment combinations to optimize their effects.
- Magic users switch to physical attacks when out of mana, limiting melee weapon usefulness to their effects. This impacts character build strategies.
Performance:
- The game is lightweight and doesn't require significant system resources. This is a positive aspect for players with older or less powerful hardware, allowing them to enjoy the game without performance issues.
- The game's visuals are accurately represented in promotional materials and previews. This builds trust with potential players, as they can expect the actual game to look as good as advertised.
Recommendations:
- Many reviewers are requesting a fullscreen mode. Some users are even refunding the game or waiting to purchase until this feature is implemented. The lack of this feature is significantly impacting user experience and enjoyment.
- Reviewers are optimistic about future content updates, drawing comparisons to games like Diablo 4 and Path of Exile. They hope for the addition of new equipment, systems, and features like Greater Rifts.
- Several reviewers mention that the game is worth its current price. One reviewer gave the game a score of 75 out of 100.
- Purchasing the supporter pack to get an extra character at the start can prevent players from getting stuck early on. Alternatively, players can grind for about three hours to earn enough in-game currency to unlock another character.
- The game is being recommended as something to play while at work. This point has a low importance because it does not provide constructive feedback.
Miscellaneous:
- Players are requesting a full-screen mode, which the developers have confirmed is coming in a future update. This suggests that the initial release lacked a standard feature, impacting user experience.
- Players are reporting that the game may be missing sound. This is a critical issue that severely impacts the user experience and immersion.
- The online mode requires players to manually enter their opponent's ID for 1v1 matches. This is an inconvenient and outdated system for online matchmaking, hindering the ease of playing with others.
- The developers have acknowledged that there are connection issues. This indicates a problem with the game's online infrastructure that needs to be addressed.
- The items included in the supporter pack are considered unremarkable. This diminishes the value proposition for players who are considering purchasing the supporter pack to further support the game.
