MindsEye Review Summary

Last updated: 2025-06-11
  • Engaging story with high-quality cutscenes, acting.
  • Potential shown, promising experience for some.
  • Unintelligent enemy AI; unreactive in combat.
  • Restrictive, empty open-world environment.
  • Poor optimization leads to frequent crashes.
  • Poor driving mechanics and physics.
MindsEye header

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Engaging and interesting story: Many reviewers praised the game's story as interesting, engaging, and well-written. They appreciated the characters, plot twists, and cinematic presentation. Some noted the story's potential and were eager to see how it unfolds.

Enjoyable and promising experience: Many reviewers expressed overall enjoyment of the game, highlighting its fun factor, potential, and solid foundation. Some reviewers found the game to be a refreshing change from other genres and praised its ambition and unique premise.

High-quality cutscenes and acting: The game's cutscenes and voice acting were frequently praised for their quality and cinematic presentation. Reviewers noted the well-done facial expressions, character models, and motion capture, with some drawing comparisons to AAA titles and movies.

Similar to Grand Theft Auto: Several reviewers noted the game's similarities to the Grand Theft Auto series, citing similar gameplay mechanics, mission structures, and overall feel. This was generally seen as a positive aspect, with some reviewers appreciating the familiar and enjoyable experience.

Immersive and detailed city: Reviewers found the city of Red Rock to be a believable and immersive environment, blending elements of Los Santos with futuristic and corporate aesthetics. They appreciated the city's technological advancements, detailed design, and opportunities for interaction.

Common complaints

Poor optimization; frequent crashes: The game suffers from severe technical issues. Many reviewers report frequent crashes, stutters, FPS drops, and poor optimization, even on high-end hardware. This makes the game difficult, or even impossible, to play.

Unintelligent, unreactive enemy AI: The game's AI is lacking, with enemies exhibiting simplistic and unrealistic behaviors. They often stand still, fail to react to damage, and lack tactical awareness. This makes combat feel unchallenging and immersion-breaking.

Restrictive, empty open-world: The game is marketed as open-world, but feels linear and restrictive. Players are funneled through missions with little opportunity for free exploration or side activities. The world feels empty and lifeless, lacking the depth and interactivity expected of a true open-world experience.

Poor driving mechanics and physics: Driving is a significant issue, with poor physics, handling, and frequent glitches. Reviewers describe cars as feeling floaty and prone to flipping, with erratic NPC traffic and collision behavior. Frame rate drops during driving exacerbate these problems.

Blurry, unappealing graphics: The game suffers from visual issues such as excessive blur, poor anti-aliasing, and low-resolution textures. The inability to disable depth of field is a common complaint.

Gameplay and performance

Linear gameplay, GTA-like elements: The game features gameplay similar to GTA and Saints Row, but with a linear story progression instead of a true open-world experience. The open-world map serves as a backdrop for missions, with driving and shooting elements.

Driving is functional, not groundbreaking: Driving mechanics are generally considered functional and enjoyable, though not particularly realistic or groundbreaking. Some reviewers compare the driving to GTA or Cyberpunk, while others find it generic due to the Unreal Engine 5 implementation.

Repetitive missions, excessive cutscenes: The game relies heavily on cutscenes and repetitive mission structures, such as fetch quests and wave-based combat. This can lead to a boring gameplay loop, especially in the early stages, where driving to locations is followed by simple cover-based shooting.

Inconsistent gunplay quality: Gunplay receives mixed reviews, ranging from 'great' to 'lackluster' and 'basic'. Some compare it favorably to other games, while others find it uninspired, with enemies not reacting convincingly to being shot. Overall, the gunplay is considered average and unremarkable.

Story focuses on AI, PTSD: The story focuses on a protagonist with PTSD and memory loss, working in a futuristic setting dominated by AI. The narrative explores themes of advanced AI and its potential problems, with the protagonist's relationship with a drone being a key element.

Inconsistent, demanding performance; optimization needed: Many reviewers report inconsistent and demanding performance, even on high-end hardware. They experience frame rate drops, stutters, and general optimization issues across various settings and resolutions. Some reviewers compare the performance to Cyberpunk 2077's rocky launch.

Frame generation: boosts FPS, artifacts: Frame generation technologies (DLSS, FSR) are often required to achieve playable frame rates, but introduce trade-offs. While they can significantly boost FPS, reviewers also report issues like ghosting artifacts, input lag, and minimal performance gains in some cases.

Texture and visual glitch issues: Several reviewers mention visual glitches such as texture flickering, slow texture loading, and blurry distant objects. These issues detract from the overall visual experience and immersion.

Cutscene issues: freezing, reloading: Cutscenes have their own set of problems, including freezing, background reloading, and being locked at 30 FPS. Some reviewers also noted unskippable cutscenes.

Settings changes: minimal impact: Changing graphics settings or NVIDIA settings sometimes has minimal impact on performance or visuals. Some reviewers also noted that the auto graphic detection sets everything to epic settings.

Recommendations

Wait for patches and sales: Many reviewers suggest waiting for patches, fixes, and sales before purchasing. The game is frequently compared to Cyberpunk 2077's rocky launch, with hope that it can be similarly redeemed through updates. Some suggest waiting months or even a year for substantial improvements.

Game is unpolished and overpriced: Numerous reviewers are requesting refunds due to the game's poor performance, bugs, and lack of polish. Many feel the game is overpriced for its current state, with some considering it an alpha or early access build. Some reviewers strongly advise against purchasing the game in its current state, calling it a scam.

Game has potential, give chance: Despite the issues, some reviewers find the game enjoyable and recommend giving it a chance. They encourage players to form their own opinions and not be swayed by negative reviews. Some reviewers highlight the game's potential and express hope that future updates will improve the experience.

Story and cutscenes are strong: The story and cutscenes are frequently mentioned as strong points, with some suggesting the game is worth buying for the story alone. Some reviewers recommend the game as a playable movie, but caution that it may disappoint those seeking broader gameplay.

Negative criticism is overblown: Some reviewers believe the game did not deserve the amount of hate it received on Steam. The reviewer considers the game to be one of the best.

Other review notes

Hope for future improvements: Many reviewers express hope for future improvements through updates and patches, acknowledging the game's potential despite its current shortcomings. They are willing to give the developers time to address issues and add content, indicating a belief in the game's long-term prospects.

Worth trying for a while: Several reviewers suggest the game might be worth trying, especially if the price is acceptable. They recommend playing for a couple of hours to determine if the game is enjoyable, implying a make-or-break initial experience.

Potential, but unpolished graphics: Reviewers note the game's potential and ambition, but also point out that it feels unpolished. Some suggest the game's graphics received the most attention. The game uses raytracing, which may cause issues for some players.

Game released too early: Some reviewers felt the game was released too early. One reviewer refunded the game, marking it as the first refund in 25 years of gaming, which shows signs of review bombing.

User-generated content support: The game features community-created content and includes an editor for creating missions and levels. This user-generated content is expected to extend the game's lifespan and enrich the overall experience.