Ells Tales: Egg Review Summary

Last updated: 2026-10-28
  • Praise for graphics and atmosphere
  • Fun and entertaining gameplay
  • Unique and cool concept
  • Repetitive egg jump rope
  • Finicky and inaccurate controls
  • Frustrating trial-and-error gameplay
Ells Tales: Egg header

Emotions

Archetypes

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

Steam review verdict

Beautiful graphics and atmosphere plus a fun, unique concept are undermined by repetitive egg jump rope, finicky inaccurate controls, and frustrating trial-and-error gameplay.

What players like

Praise for graphics and atmosphere: Many reviewers highlight the game's visuals, atmosphere, and retro style as strong points. The graphics are described as nice, nostalgic, and fittingly dirty or strict.

Fun and entertaining gameplay: The core gameplay loop is described as very entertaining, fun, and exciting. The simple clicker mechanics combined with puzzles keep players engaged.

Unique and cool concept: Reviewers appreciate the game's original and unusual concept. The idea of protecting an egg in a dark, bizarre setting stands out as novel and interesting.

Positively surprised and enjoyed: Several reviewers were pleasantly surprised by the game and expressed strong overall enjoyment. The game exceeded expectations and was found to be really fun.

Puzzle elements enhance gameplay: The puzzles are a key part of the fun, requiring thought rather than mindless clicking. Solving riddles and clues is engaging and rewarding.

Common complaints

Repetitive egg jump rope: Players criticize the egg jump rope mini-game as monotonous, difficult, and making up most of the gameplay. Retrying after mistakes forces painful repetition.

Finicky and inaccurate controls: Controls are frequently misread, causing unintended actions like grabbing a chicken instead of jumping. Inaccurate aiming or one-pixel errors lead to instant game over.

Frustrating trial-and-error gameplay: The game requires guessing and learning from death due to first-time traps, with vague hints and no guidance. This creates a frustrating trial-and-error loop.

Unclear ending and story: The ending meanings, protagonist's identity, and overall story are unclear or incoherent. Many players did not understand the two endings.

Excessive repetition for achievements: Achievement hunting involves endless repetition of the egg jump rope without guides. Some achievements are obscure or fail to unlock.

Gameplay and performance

Egg jump rope is core mechanic: The central gameplay loop requires repeatedly pressing a button to make an egg jump rope without breaking it. Players compare it to a timing-based minigame where mistimed input cracks the egg.

Escape room puzzle structure: Progress requires solving puzzles and deduction through trial and error to escape the chicken coop. Hints are scattered throughout the environment, supporting an escape-game style of play.

Survival horror clicker hybrid: The game blends clicker mechanics with survival horror and surreal elements, where the player must save a chicken egg to stay alive. The tone is described as bizarre and lightly horrific.

Save the egg to survive: The primary objective is to keep a chicken egg from breaking while also preserving the player's life. Failing to protect the egg carries direct consequences.

Mouse buttons trigger distinct actions: The left and right mouse buttons perform separate functions with distinct failure outcomes. Clicking the left button saws off the player's hands, while the right button starts the egg-jumping minigame.

Good optimization performance: Reviewers rate the game's optimization as good, indicating it runs smoothly on their hardware.

Graphical glitches reported: Some players encountered graphical glitches during play, which can detract from visual quality.

Recommendations

Genre expectations matter: The game is frequently recommended or discouraged based on genre preferences, such as puzzle, horror, clicker, FPS, or escape game expectations. Reviewers warn that it is not for everyone and may disappoint those expecting a specific genre.

Strong overall recommendation: Multiple reviewers recommend the game and consider it worth playing at least once, with some calling it a must-play. The positive sentiment is consistent across clusters, though often qualified by genre expectations.

Short but cheap experience: Reviewers note the game is short, with all endings reachable in about an hour, and cheap, making it a value-appropriate time killer. Some say it can be skipped without missing anything, while others find it worth trying given the low price.

Use guides for achievements: Players aiming for achievements are advised to consult guides or YouTube videos, and one suggests solving puzzles independently for the reward. Another recommends reaching the ending while motivation is high.

Suited for streamers: Reviewers highlight the game as a strong fit for streaming and content creation, with one noting it is only recommended for streamers. The show effect makes it appealing for live broadcasting.

Buying context

Game completion: 1.0h.

Story completion: 1.0h.

Session length: 0.5h.

Endgame: 1.0h.

Players who click with the odd premise report immediate fun and addictiveness, while one reviewer finds it tedious and technically unreliable. No explicit unlock point or delayed enjoyment threshold is described.

Friction: Tedious gameplay; Technical failures at key moments.

Player profiles

Death-Game Trial-and-Error Fan: Moves cautiously, avoids the obvious first action, and learns from deadly mistakes. Motivation: Surviving lethal trial-and-error scenarios and avoiding death. Stance: buy.

Puzzle Seeker: Follows trailer hints and in-game clues, expecting puzzles to have satisfying depth. Motivation: Finding meaningful puzzle clues and solving mysteries. Stance: no buy.

Achievement Completionist: Pushes through a hard learning curve in short sessions and tracks achievement bugs. Motivation: Earning all achievements and reaching 100% completion. Stance: buy.

Other review notes

Very short game length: Many players note the game is extremely short, often completed in under an hour and sometimes in about 30 minutes. This is the most frequently mentioned characteristic.

Extremely low price point: Reviewers repeatedly highlight the game's very low price, with some feeling it is worth more than the asking price. The low cost is seen as a key selling point.

Comparisons to Inscryption: Several reviews compare the game's atmosphere to Inscryption, suggesting a similar eerie or unsettling mood. This comparison appears multiple times.

Retro-style graphics: The game features a peculiar retro art style, with some comparing it to Demon's Roulette. This visual choice is noted by multiple players.

Localization support available: The game includes Russian localization for its minimal text, and Chinese localization was added in an update. Japanese language support is also available.