Canvas of Kings Review Summary

Last updated: 2025-07-17
  • Easy, fast, and intuitive map creation
  • Excellent for TTRPG map generation
  • High potential, actively developed
  • Limited features and asset variety
  • Early access, incomplete software
  • Frequent crashes and bugs
Canvas of Kings header

Emotions

What players like:

Common complaints:

Gameplay feedback:

Performance notes:

Recommendations:

Other player notes:

Review evidence

Why players say this

What players like

Easy & Fast Map Creation: Players consistently praise the tool for its exceptional ease of use and speed in creating detailed maps, especially for TTRPGs like D&D. It significantly reduces the time and effort traditionally required for map-making, allowing users to generate high-quality maps quickly.

Intuitive, Powerful & Promising: The software is highly regarded for its intuitive interface, robust functionality, and overall positive user experience. Many users find it incredibly valuable, often stating it's worth more than its price and expressing excitement for its future development, even in early access.

Aesthetic & Cohesive Visuals: The tool's visual assets are consistently praised for their quality, cohesive hand-drawn style, and aesthetic appeal. The minimalistic interface further enhances the user experience, making map creation visually pleasing and efficient.

Active & Responsive Developer: The developer is highly active and responsive to community feedback, consistently releasing updates and implementing user suggestions. This dedication fosters a positive user experience and indicates ongoing improvement of the software.

Custom Asset Support: A standout feature is the ability to upload and edit custom assets, allowing users to create unique building shapes and overcome limitations in the existing asset library. This significantly enhances creative freedom and customization.

Common complaints

Limited Features and Assets: Players consistently report that the software lacks a wide variety of essential features and assets, limiting creative possibilities. This includes a scarcity of terrain options, building types, environmental elements, and general objects, making it difficult to create diverse and detailed maps.

Poor User Interface & Tutorials: The user interface is frequently described as unintuitive, clunky, and difficult to navigate. Reviewers also note a lack of effective tutorials or walkthroughs, contributing to a steep learning curve for new users.

Incomplete/Early Stage Software: Many users feel the software is incomplete or still in an early development stage, lacking the polish and core functionalities expected for its price point. This sentiment is tied to the overall lack of features and stability issues.

Frequent Crashes and Bugs: Frequent crashes and various bugs are a major concern, often leading to loss of progress and frustration. Issues range from general instability to specific problems with map export, object rendering, and working with larger map sizes.

Asset Management Difficulties: Users report difficulties with asset management, including janky asset editors, poor randomized placement, and issues with selecting overlapping objects. The inability to search for assets also hinders workflow.

Gameplay and performance

Excellent for TTRPG maps: The software is highly valued by users for creating various types of maps for tabletop role-playing games (TTRPGs), including combat maps, city maps, and small world regions. It is particularly useful for D&D and Pathfinder campaigns.

Intuitive and easy to use: Users consistently praise the software for its intuitive tools and simple interface, making it easy to learn and use. Many found they could grasp the basics within 30 minutes through trial and error.

Quick map generation: The tool allows for quick map creation, enabling users to put together maps rapidly, sometimes in as little as 10 minutes. It also offers unique ways to achieve desired aesthetics and fine details, focusing on randomness and auto-generated elements.

Limited asset variety: While the included assets are sufficient for basic encounters, users desire more variety in wildlife, building options, and furniture. The current selection can lead to a lack of distinctiveness in larger towns.

Still in early development: The application is still in early access or beta, with ongoing development. This means some features are still missing, and the current feature set is largely driven by the developer's immediate needs.

Performance issues and crashes: Multiple users reported that the software experiences performance issues and crashes frequently. Additionally, the tool itself is described as being quite resource-intensive, which likely contributes to these problems.

Fast map rendering: Users praised the speed of map rendering within the software, noting that it performs significantly better than competing tools like Inkarnate. This indicates a strong point in its core functionality.

Unclear AMD CPU support: A user noted that the product page only lists Intel CPUs, which raises concerns about potential lack of support or optimization for AMD processors. This could be a significant barrier for AMD users.

Driver and GPU dependency: Players need to ensure they have the correct drivers and a compatible graphics card to run the game smoothly. This suggests that specific hardware and software configurations are crucial for a good experience.

Reasonable PC requirements: One user found the PC requirements to be reasonable, indicating that the game is accessible to a wide range of hardware setups. This is a positive point for potential players.

Recommendations

Highly Recommended Tool: Many players highly recommend the tool, praising its overall quality and value for money. They find it to be an excellent and worthwhile purchase, often giving it top ratings.

Ideal for DMs and TTRPGs: The tool is strongly recommended for Dungeon Masters (DMs) and TTRPG players for quick and effective map creation. It's seen as a valuable addition to a DM's toolkit, especially for fantasy settings.

High Potential, Needs Development: Players see significant potential for the tool to become a market leader with continued development. They suggest improvements like more assets, large-scale map support, and a more user-friendly interface.

Try the Demo First: Players recommend trying the demo to assess if the tool meets individual needs. They note that the full version offers substantially more features than the demo.

Smooth Session Preparation: The tool helps users prepare for game sessions calmly and without technical hitches, implying reliability and ease of use.

Other review notes

Expand content and assets: Players consistently request more content, including diverse assets for various themes (fantasy, modern, urban, medieval, space), specific structures like temples and fountains, and environmental elements such as mountains, cliffs, caves, and dungeons. There's a strong desire for more variety in buildings, landmarks, and basic objects like furniture.

High potential, ongoing development: Users acknowledge the tool is in early access and has significant potential for growth. They are excited about future updates and the developer's commitment, eagerly anticipating new features and improvements as the software evolves.

Improve features and QoL: Players suggest various quality-of-life improvements and additional features. These include more precise selection, automation for landscape filling, color tweaking for objects, better UI, onboarding tutorials, undo/redo functionality, and enhanced export settings for videos.

Easy to use and intuitive: The tool is praised for its ease of use and simplicity, making it accessible even for beginners. Despite some initial overwhelming feelings, users find it intuitive for map creation, fulfilling its core purpose effectively.

Implement Workshop/Mod support: Many users express a strong desire for Steam Workshop integration or modding support. They believe this would significantly enhance the tool's capabilities by allowing users to create and share their own assets and extensions, addressing the current limitations in content variety.