Clickteam Fusion 2.5

Users are highly satisfied with the software's ease of use, particularly for beginners and non-programmers, and its no-code visual development approach. They appreciate its versatility for creating 2D, small, and indie games, as well as its powerful functionality, community support, and value for money, especially when purchased at a discount. The ability to quickly prototype and realize game ideas without extensive coding is a major contributor to this positive emotion.

Frustration stems primarily from the high cost of the software and its DLCs, especially when compared to free or cheaper alternatives. Users also report significant issues with bugs, lack of an autosave feature, outdated design, confusing interface, and limitations that require workarounds or hinder complex game development. Poor optimization, instability, and a perceived lack of updates or value further contribute to this frustration.

Disappointment is largely driven by the software's high price relative to its perceived value, outdated features, and lack of significant updates. Users feel the engine is stagnant, has unfulfilled potential, and is inferior to free alternatives, particularly for complex projects. The cost of essential exporters and DLCs, along with restrictions on monetization in standard versions, also leads to disappointment.

Users express excitement over the engine's capabilities for no-code development, allowing them to easily create their own games and quickly see results. The potential for game development, suitability for game jams, and the ability to recreate specific game ideas or make fan games are significant sources of excitement. Discovering the engine's possibilities and its role in animating new developers also contributes to this feeling.

Anger is primarily directed at the pricing model, including the high cost of the software and 'scummy' DLC practices. Users perceive poor value, misleading advertising, and hidden costs, leading to strong negative reactions. Critical bugs affecting game distribution and a perceived negative developer attitude also fuel this anger.