- Stable and polished performance across platforms
- Strong single-player and local co-op experience
- Nostalgic, faithful remaster with DLC included
- Dead multiplayer servers limit online play
- Bug-ridden re-release with disastrous launch
- Overpriced for content with poor graphical upgrades
Emotions
The primary causes of disappointment stem from the game's multiplayer being largely nonfunctional, with dead servers, empty lobbies, and persistent bugs. Players also criticize the lack of meaningful improvements, lazy development, and poor value compared to the originals, feeling the remaster failed to revive the saga or meet nostalgic expectations.
Frustration arises from widespread technical issues, including game-breaking bugs, crashes, unplayable multiplayer, and poor optimization. Players also highlight tedious achievements, outdated netcode, sensitivity issues, and a lack of mod support, which disrupt gameplay and limit customization.
Satisfaction is driven by post-launch improvements, such as bug fixes, smooth performance on modern hardware (e.g., Steam Deck), and enhanced controller support. Players appreciate the preserved single-player experience, split-screen mode, and quality-of-life updates that align with their expectations for a remaster.
Nostalgia is evoked by the game's faithful recreation of classic Battlefront experiences, including revisiting iconic levels, gameplay mechanics, and childhood memories. Players enjoy the remaster's ability to retain the original charm while offering minor graphical or technical upgrades.
Anger is directed at the developers for perceived laziness, stolen modded content, and a lack of effort in the remaster. Players feel the game exploits fan nostalgia, with poor execution, missing features, and a rushed release that insults the legacy of the original titles.
Verdict
Mostly negative
Summary
Positive 37% · Negative 63%. Score: 63 / 100
Positives:
- Players report no game-breaking bugs, smooth gameplay, and significant post-launch fixes. The game runs well on modern hardware and Steam Deck, with minor graphical glitches being non-disruptive.
- The single-player campaigns, galactic conquest, and instant action modes are praised for their fun, nostalgic, and chaotic gameplay. Players highlight improved replayability and smooth performance.
- Split-screen support (including for single-player modes) and local co-op are highly valued, especially for playing with friends or family. This feature was missing in original PC versions and is now a major selling point.
- The game retains the core experience of the originals while adding modern quality-of-life improvements. Fans appreciate the nostalgic feel, faithful gameplay, and updated graphics.
- Native controller support, rumble, and seamless Steam Deck compatibility make the game accessible and enjoyable for players preferring these input methods.
Negatives:
- Multiplayer is largely unplayable due to empty or non-functional servers, lack of crossplay, and poor netcode inherited from the original. Players struggle to find matches, and the population has dropped significantly post-launch.
- The remaster introduces numerous bugs, graphical issues, and gameplay glitches not present in the original versions. Players report teleporting characters, spinning screens, and broken Instant Action mode, making the experience worse than emulating the originals.
- The game is criticized for its high price relative to the lack of improvements, with many feeling it’s a cash grab. The cost is seen as unjustified given the minimal enhancements over the originals, which are often cheaper.
- Graphics are merely upscaled with AI, offering no meaningful improvements. Textures and HUD elements appear worse on modern displays, and some maps look inferior to the original PC version.
- Achievements are either broken, unregistered, or require tedious class-specific playstyles. Some players report missing achievements for later content or entire games in the bundle.
Gameplay:
- Players frequently mention the lack of 4-player split-screen (available in the 2005 version) and limitations in local multiplayer, including 2-player restrictions and reduced features in later parts of the game.
- Galactic Conquest mode is praised for its turn-based strategy but criticized for lacking online functionality, limiting it to local or split-screen play.
- Modding capabilities are either limited or absent compared to older versions, with players noting compatibility issues and unfulfilled expectations for modding tools like Battlefront Legends.
- The game offers robust single-player campaigns, offline modes, and solo play, which are well-received despite multiplayer shortcomings. Balancing and cutscenes are also noted.
- The UI is criticized for poor design choices, font problems, and glitches, with some players preferring the older PS2-style menus.
Performance:
- FPS is often capped at 30, especially in multiplayer or when hosting servers, with additional issues like framelock limiting performance to 60 FPS. Some players report unlocked FPS (144Hz+), but this is inconsistent.
- The game crashes during online matches, when skipping cutscenes, in specific modes (e.g., Hero Assault), and at higher resolutions (above 1080p). Random crashes to the menu are also commonly reported.
- Initial launch issues included server auto-kicks, split-screen bugs, and crashes, but patches have addressed many of these problems, improving stability over time.
- Various bugs affect gameplay, including graphical/audio issues, cursor bugs in windowed mode, player pop-in/out, and map selection problems in Instant Action mode.
- The game generally runs well on modern hardware, with smooth performance reported by many players, though some still experience crashes or black screen issues.
Recommendations:
- Many players strongly recommend purchasing the original versions of the games instead of this collection due to better modding support, lower cost, and superior multiplayer experiences. The originals are seen as more flexible and reliable for long-term play.
- The game is widely criticized for its pricing, with many suggesting it is not worth the asking price in its current state. Players recommend waiting for a sale or purchasing the original versions instead to save money.
- The collection is recommended primarily for players driven by nostalgia or those who do not own the original games. It is seen as a way to revisit classic experiences but is not considered a must-buy for new players.
- The collection is primarily recommended for solo players, local co-op, or splitscreen experiences. Players seeking online multiplayer or modding capabilities are advised to avoid this version due to its limitations and bugs.
- Players highlight significant bugs and balancing issues, advising against purchasing until fixes are implemented. Multiplayer and modding support are frequently requested improvements to make the game viable.
Miscellaneous:
- The collection is widely viewed as a rushed product, with players accusing the publisher of prioritizing profit over quality. This is amplified by missing features and technical issues.
- Players note discrepancies in language support, such as German voice acting limited to cutscenes, creating a disjointed experience for non-English speakers.
- Cutscenes are reportedly absent from the campaign, breaking immersion and narrative flow for players.
- Criticism of Aspyr's history with remasters (e.g., KOTOR II on Switch) fuels skepticism about this collection's quality and long-term support.
- Players express confusion over the 'register your game' prompt, which lacks clarity on its purpose or benefits.
Similar games
Blend with other games
94%STAR WARS™: Episode I: Jedi Power Battles™
94%LEGO® Star Wars™: The Skywalker Saga
93%STAR WARS Jedi: Survivor™
93%Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine - Master Crafted Edition
93%Battlefield™ 6
93%Company of Heroes 3
93%Command & Conquer™ Remastered Collection
93%STAR WARS™: Bounty Hunter™
93%Angels Fall First
92%STAR WARS Jedi: Fallen Order™
92%HELLDIVERS™ 2
92%Men of War II