
What players like:
Common complaints:
Gameplay feedback:
Performance notes:
Recommendations:
Other player notes:












Review evidence
Engaging story, beautiful art, and charming characters with a satisfying ending and fun deduction twists, but forced murder mystery, tedious ending collection, and no Chinese localization hold it back.
Story is engaging and interesting: Players consistently praise the story as interesting, moving, and well-crafted, with multiple twists that keep them engaged. The narrative is described as progressing quickly and being well-supported throughout.
Beautiful art and illustrations: The art style, illustrations, and character art are consistently praised as beautiful, excellent, and well-drawn. Players appreciate the visual quality of the game, including the cute and cool character designs.
High-quality mystery adventure game: The game is repeatedly described as a thoughtful, immersive, and polished mystery adventure. Players appreciate the well-executed murder mystery feel and the overall high quality of the experience.
Satisfying and happy ending: Players are pleased with the ending, describing it as satisfactory, happy, and emotionally moving. The true ending wraps up the story nicely, and the multiple endings are seen as meaningful and well put together.
Charming and well-developed characters: Characters are described as charming, captivating, distinct, and likable, with each being well-developed and well-established. The heroines and sister character are specifically noted as cute.
Lack of Chinese localization: Multiple reviews highlight the absence of official Simplified Chinese support, which is a significant barrier for Chinese-speaking players. This is a common and specific complaint that affects accessibility.
Forced murder mystery elements: The murder mystery aspects are described as unnatural and not fitting the game system, feeling forced. This suggests a disconnect between the theme and mechanics.
Tedious ending collection: Collecting all endings is very tedious, and the secret ending requires full collection, which is painful. This is a completionist's frustration.
Confusing clue direction: Clue organization and direction are either hard to understand or too obvious, making the investigation feel inconsistent. This affects the core gameplay loop.
Settings not persisting: Fullscreen and skip settings reset on launch, which is a technical annoyance that disrupts the user experience. This is a specific and easily fixable bug.
Murder mystery deduction adventure: The game is consistently described as a murder-mystery-style adventure game with a strong narrative focus. Players listen to testimonies, gather evidence, and deduce the culprit in a single-player script murder format.
Deduction and reasoning mechanics: Core gameplay revolves around deduction quizzes, placing evidence in slots, and combining clues to solve mysteries. The reasoning is often based on timelines and alibis, with a difficulty level comparable to Ace Attorney.
Discussion and voting phases: The game includes structured group discussion phases where characters state their reasoning, followed by a voting phase to select the culprit. This loop of questioning, reasoning, and voting is a central mechanic.
Investigation and evidence gathering: Gameplay involves investigating players, gathering testimony, and verifying evidence through dialogue. Players must collect and combine evidence to prove the culprit and solve questions.
Multiple endings with true ending: The game features multiple endings, including a true ending and a secret ending. Reaching the true ending requires specific dialogue choices and photo selections throughout the playthrough.
First deduction scene black screen: A bug causes the first deduction scene to appear as a black screen, preventing players from seeing the content. This is a specific and impactful issue that occurs early in the game.
ESC exits fullscreen unexpectedly: Pressing ESC exits fullscreen mode, which is considered a strange and unintuitive behavior. This disrupts gameplay and is a specific control issue.
Steam Deck OLED compatibility issues: The game did not work well on Steam Deck OLED, indicating compatibility problems with that specific hardware. This is a niche but important issue for affected users.
Rendering issues on Radeon: Some players experience rendering issues, possibly related to Radeon graphics environments. This is a niche but specific technical problem that affects visual quality.
Screenshots not working: Players report that screenshots are not working in the game. This is a specific functionality issue that affects the ability to capture moments.
Buy on sale: Multiple reviews recommend purchasing the game during a sale or at a discount, with some specifying 50% off or a historical low. This suggests the game is considered good value at a reduced price.
Overall recommendation: Several reviews give a general positive recommendation, stating the game is worth trying or recommending without hesitation. This indicates a broadly favorable reception.
Entry-level mystery game: The game is recommended as an entry-level mystery or visual novel for those new to the genre. It is considered accessible for players unfamiliar with reasoning ADVs.
For mystery genre fans: The game is recommended for fans of mystery adventure games, deduction games, and reasoning-focused titles. This suggests it appeals to players who enjoy the mystery genre.
For Ace Attorney fans: Reviews recommend the game to fans of Ace Attorney, Danganronpa, Raging Loop, Gnosia, and Paranormasight. This indicates it shares elements with these popular mystery titles.
Community fair range: $7.00 - $10.00.
Game completion: 30.0h.
Story completion: 10.0h.
Endgame: 20.0h.
The game begins with heavy busywork in its investigation phases, but players who push past the first case find the story and gameplay become more engaging.
Friction: repetitive choice selection; brute-force questioning; poor scene pacing; deduction feels like a recap of revealed truth; busywork in evidence gathering.
Unlock drivers: completing the first case.
Casual Newcomer: Plays casually, focuses on story and characters, does not overanalyze mechanics. Motivation: Casual fun and enjoyment without demanding puzzle depth. Stance: buy.
Veteran Critic: Analytical and comparative, evaluates mechanics against genre standards. Motivation: Seeking challenging and innovative deduction, but not satisfied. Stance: no buy.
Story Enthusiast: Reads carefully, appreciates atmosphere, may skip or tolerate puzzle sections. Motivation: Immersive storytelling and character-driven experience. Stance: buy.
Steam Deck: The feedback is mixed. While some users report a flawless experience on Steam Deck, others encounter compatibility issues and game bugs. Official non-support adds uncertainty. The game is not broken but may require patience or luck.
Lack of Chinese localization: Multiple reviewers noted the absence of official Simplified Chinese support, with some mentioning fan-made machine translation patches as a workaround. This is a significant barrier for Chinese-speaking players.
Price considered high: Some reviewers feel the game is priced high for its content, especially given the lack of voice acting and relatively short playtime. Others argue the price is justified by the experience, leading to mixed opinions.
Comparisons to other ADV titles: Reviewers compare the game to Zero Escape, Danganronpa, Paranormasight, Raging Loop, and Gnosia, highlighting similarities in genre and mechanics. These comparisons help position the game within the visual novel landscape.
Playtime around 10 hours: Most reviewers report a playtime of about 10 hours for the true ending, with full collection taking up to 15 hours. This is considered a moderate length for an ADV.
Story setting and premise: The game is set in 2004 on a remote Japanese island, featuring a classic rural summer vacation group murder. This setting is compared to Summertime Rendering and Erased, appealing to fans of mystery anime.