Players expressed satisfaction due to the game's high overall quality, including its improved physics system, engaging and challenging puzzle-solving, and the freedom it offers for creative bridge design. The game's educational value, replayability, and the sense of achievement from optimizing solutions also contributed significantly to player contentment.
Disappointment stemmed primarily from the perceived lack of new features and content compared to previous iterations, as well as the removal of certain core gameplay mechanics. Players also expressed dissatisfaction with the game's price point, issues with controls, and a feeling that the fun wore off quickly due to repetitive or uninspired level design in later stages.
Joy was frequently associated with the initial gameplay experience, the freedom to experiment with bridge designs, and the entertainment derived from the game's problem-solving aspects. The ability to create and share levels through the workshop, along with the general fun and relaxing nature of the game, also contributed to players' happiness.
Frustration arose from restrictive level design, particularly in later stages, which often led to repeated failures and a feeling of being forced into specific solutions. Technical issues like freezing during simulation, awkward controls, and significant difficulty spikes, especially in 'jump levels,' also contributed to player annoyance.
Players found enjoyment in the game's balanced challenge, well-designed levels, and the overall engaging puzzle gameplay. The trial-and-error process, often leading to humorous car crashes, and the enhanced experience through external content creators, also contributed to a fun pastime.
Churn analysis is not available yet for this game. It may be missing price data, not have enough reviews, or just hasn't been processed yet.