The Enjenir: The Engineering Physics Building Simulator Review Summary

Rewarding, varied puzzles and missions: The game offers a variety of fun and challenging missions and puzzles with multiple solutions. Successfully completing these challenges, often through trial and error, provides a rewarding sense of accomplishment.

Excellent, fun physics-based gameplay: The game features well-executed and enjoyable physics, allowing for both goofy and realistic interactions. The physics engine enhances the building and destruction aspects, making the experience more engaging and fun.

Creative freedom with grid-less building: The game's grid-less building system allows for creative freedom and unique designs. This freedom enhances the building experience, allowing for both imperfect and functional structures.

Fun, creative, and enjoyable experience: The game is described as fun, enjoyable, and creative, with a light-hearted tone and a good sense of humor. Players find the gameplay captivating and immersive, with the potential for many hours of enjoyment.

Active, responsive developers: The developers are actively engaged with the community, responding to feedback, implementing suggestions, and providing regular updates. This active involvement enhances the player experience and demonstrates a commitment to improving the game.

Clunky, frustrating character controls/physics: The game's controls and physics, especially character movement, are frequently described as clunky, 'wonky,' and frustrating. Many compare it to 'QWOP'-like controls, making even basic actions difficult and detracting from the core engineering gameplay. This issue appears consistently across many reviews.

Frustrating and unpolished building mechanics: Many reviewers find the building mechanics to be frustrating, difficult, and unpolished. Basic constructions take too long, and the building tools are insufficient. This makes it hard to achieve desired results, especially as constructions grow more complex.

Game feels unfinished and unpolished: Several reviews mention the game feeling unfinished, with bugs, a steep difficulty curve, and a lack of polish. Some reviewers also point out that certain levels feel like rehashes of previous ones, making progression feel unrewarding.

Missing key building features: Reviewers express frustration with the lack of essential building features such as blueprints, copy/paste functionality, undo/redo, and the ability to save designs. The inability to edit parts without rebuilding them from scratch further exacerbates the problem.

Problematic camera controls: Camera controls are frequently criticized for being clunky, awkward, and lacking essential features like zoom. This makes it difficult to view certain elements and hinders the building process.

Creative physics-based construction gameplay: The core gameplay revolves around physics-based construction using basic materials to complete varied objectives. Players build structures like bridges and vehicles to support weight, reach destinations, and solve puzzles in campaign and sandbox modes. The game emphasizes creative problem-solving through engineering.

Humorous physics sandbox gameplay: The game blends sandbox elements with a 3D physics engine, often leading to emergent and humorous outcomes. The physics simulation, while not always realistic, contributes to the fun and unpredictable nature of the gameplay. The medieval theme enhances the overall experience.

Easy to learn, hard to master: The building mechanics are easy to learn but also complicated. This suggests that the game has a low barrier to entry but offers depth and complexity for players who want to master it. The game is simple and makes you think.

Level grading encourages optimization: The game grades player performance on each level, encouraging optimization and replayability. Achieving high grades requires efficient and creative engineering solutions. This adds a layer of challenge for players seeking to master the game.

Staged level progression: The game's levels are structured in stages, starting with tutorials and gradually introducing new locations and puzzles. This progression helps players learn the mechanics and ease into the increasing difficulty. The staged approach provides a smooth learning curve.

Good performance, even on low-end: The game exhibits good performance, running smoothly even on lower-end hardware and with complex constructions. This suggests the game is well-optimized, allowing a broader range of players to enjoy it without significant performance issues.

Game is in early alpha: The game is currently in its alpha stage, indicating that it is still under heavy development. Players should anticipate potential bugs, incomplete features, and significant changes as development progresses.

Generally positive game experience: Many reviewers recommend the game, citing its fun and enjoyable gameplay, good value for the price, and the developers' dedication. Some qualify their recommendation based on future updates or addressing current issues, but overall sentiment is positive. Some reviewers rate the game highly, with scores of 8/10 or even 10/10.

Positive outlook for future development: Reviewers express optimism about the game's future, citing the developers' responsiveness and commitment to ongoing updates and improvements. Many anticipate that the game will continue to evolve and become even better over time, with some hoping it will become a classic.

Demo recommended before purchase: Several reviewers suggest trying the demo before purchasing the game. This allows potential players to experience the gameplay and determine if it aligns with their preferences before committing to a purchase.

Humorous and entertaining character system: The game's wacky character system and over-the-top nature are highlighted as key sources of entertainment. Reviewers suggest that the game is well-suited for live streaming or commentary due to its humorous and engaging qualities.

Platforming sections are too difficult: Some reviewers find the engineer control/platforming sections more challenging than the building aspect. A suggestion is made to add an option to switch between "goofy" and "normal" character movement to address this difficulty.

Early access inconsistencies: The game is in early access, which can lead to inconsistencies in the simulation. This is a common issue in early access games, and players should expect changes and potential bugs.

Minimalistic low-poly graphics: The game uses a minimalistic visual style with low-poly graphics, which contributes to building simplicity. This aesthetic choice may appeal to some players but not to others.